posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2015
Posts: 920
|
|
S&W M&P 15/22
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/24/15 4:47 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/24/15 2:39 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 11:29 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 8:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 7:50 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 3:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:53:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 12:58 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Saturday, August 22, 2015 at 10:10:01 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:50:39 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:
On 8/22/15 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:53:34 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:
On 8/22/15 9:38 AM, Tim wrote:
Cheap ammo? Yes and no. I like the Russian for its close range
punch. Besides I have several a few other .223. This would be a
better option to the SKS.
Close range punch? Destroying concrete blocks? 
The only 30 caliber I recall shooting is a 300 blackout, which, I
suppose, is wimpy compared to the round you're considering.
Wolf Gold in .223 is back down under 30 cents a round again. It's my
cheap ammo of choice.
100 yards is the farthest distance for shooting to which I have easy
access, and for popping targets, .223 and .357 MAG do the job for me,
and, if I aim high enough, .22LR. Now, if I could only shoot my revolver
really accurately at 50 yards or more... 
The redeeming thing I have heard about the .300 blackout is it is
better in sub sonic, which would be important if you have a can.
If you just want to shoot a lot, the price of 7.62x39 is hard to beat.
The world is awash with it.
Brass cased 7.62x39 is just a penny or so a round cheaper than brass
cased .223. Brass cased 300 blackout is twice as expensive. The subsonic
300 blackout is substantially more expensive than that.
I have some bricks of "suppressor" .22LR ammo, but I haven't perceived
that it is quieter than CCI's standard velocity ammo, which can be had
nowadays for seven to 10 cents a round if you keep an eye out for it.
The subsonic thing mostly affects the sound down range. Behind the
barrel you don't hear much of the crack but you get all of the gun
noise. 22rf drops below super sonic pretty fast anyway, particularly
out of a hand gun.
Have you tried these
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/250...ead-round-nose
I have a couple bricks and they seem very quiet in an unsupressed
rifle. They make up for the low speed with more weight to maintain
down range performance.
Why not use .22 shorts?
I think that 65gr bullet would do better on squirrels if that is what
you do.
Ahh, squirrel hunting...that's what brave men do, because they can make
squirrelskin caps for their grandkids and grill the meat on the barbecue.
If you live in an Italian boarding house, was squirrel cachetore (so).
Krause considers squirrel hunting a show of courage. Probably
never ate squirrel in
his life. I prefer rabbit, but squirrel's not bad, unless it's
a 15 year-old tough
assed boar.
--
Good grief, the stupid runs deep in you, Herring.
Did you make these for your grandkids, Mr. Brave White Hunter?
http://tinyurl.com/oy7azwl
Oh, you're right...I don't eat rodents like squirrels, mice, rats,
prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, or hamsters. Or rabbits.
Now, if you are hunting armed only with a camera and you get real close
to wild animals who can rip off and eat your face, then...you are a brave
hunter and sportsman/woman.
Guinea pig is tough and greasy. At least the one I was served in Peru.
They are raised there for food. The Last Supper paining in the city of
Cusco main church has a roasted guinea Pig on the platter.
I'll be glad to take your word on that. 
Why would guinea pig be not kosher? Not really swine.
Pics
http://www.delange.org/CathedralCusc...edralCusco.htm
Because it doesn't chew its cud and it doesn't have split hooves. Both
are requirements for "meat" to be kosher.
Leviticus 11:3-8:
Whatever parts the hoof and is cloven-footed and chews the cud, among the
animals, you may eat.
Thus, the guinea pig is not kosher.
What about chicken? No hoof either, and no cud.
Chicken is not "meat."
It ain't?
Not in the sense of barnyard animals with hooves who also chew their
cuds. That was my reference to "meat."
Not what you wrote. Words matter.
Sorry, Bill, but you are way down on the list of those whose opinions on
words and such I would consider. You did see the word "meat" in quotes,
right, and the references to Leviticus, right?
Bull****. Words matter.
|