BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Keyser Söze

On 8/14/15 12:09 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/14/2015 11:32 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 8/14/15 10:25 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article nv-dnR4666AWc1DInZ2dnUU7-
, says...

I was just reading this as reported by ABC news 2 days ago:

------------------

"The last batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State
Department included one from Clinton asking to borrow a book called
?Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better,? by David
Shipley and Will Schwalbe.

When I was in the corporate world I went to a
mandatory "writing" class that was very useful.
They used a book which I think was called "Put it in
Writing." That really improved my memo writing
skills, and even bled into project documents.
Email is easy. Stick to business.
HRC of course mixed business with personal.

----------------------

The ABC article also include an image of the email reply to Hillary
from
Cheryl Mills (State staff member) This is the content:

-----------------

From: Mills, Cheryl D
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2009 8:25 PM
To: H
Subject: May I borrow

Will bring tomorrow

--- Original Message ---

From: H
Sent: Tue Dec 01 19:17:57 2009
Subject: May I borrow

SEND by David Shipley?

------------------

and thus, the coverup began.

If that thumbdrive is really a backup of the server,
which is entirely possible, they will uncover
whatever was borrowed.
What do you think it was, a nuke?
I predict this will get ridiculously fantastical when
the PERSONAL emails, like the one above, are leaked
by the GOP.
Like when GWB's "chemical weapons production
facility" in Iraq was revealed to be a truck trailer
boneyard.
But have at it. Hard to stop insanity.

22 million, that's million, emails dumped at the behest of Dubya and his
puppetmaster. 22 million. Seen any? How about the ones that said if they
fudged the intel on Iraq, they could start their shooting war.

HRC. Clinton. Vast right wing conspiracy.
Go figure.
HRC is no different from any other pol. Maybe Bernie
is the exception. But he's a "socialist."
Oh, and Trump. The rest are the same. Connivers.
I'm not talking "policy," which is being ignored.
Could be this whole thing is a ploy by HRC to draw
out the crazies. Whatever, she's made her bed.

The crazies were out and about long before Hillary made her
candidacy official. No need to "draw" them out.

I honestly believe that Trump was never serious about running at first.
I think it was just another of his ego driven desires for media
attention that he is prone to. I think the positive response to his
"plain talk" has been as much of a surprise to him as it has to everyone
else so now he has to go formulate some position statements to keep the
interest alive. The Donald is an interesting Duck because if you can
look beyond his style, ego and comments that are offensive to some, he's
as much a Democratic liberal as he is a Republican conservative. It wil
l be interesting to see how he defines his actual positions on issues,
assuming he ever does.

I've stated many times that I am not necessarily opposed to another
Democrat in the White House. It just depends on who and what their
ideas and positions are. I am not anti-Democrat. I am anti-Hillary and
have been for a long time. She is not the politician that her husband
was and is.

When this election cycle began Hillary was the one and only Democratic
candidate in the game and was considered to be the presumptive nominee
before she even opened her mouth and said anything. That is starting to
change. Others in her party are becoming aware of the cracks in her
armor and are scrambling to develop backups.

So, which Republican are you going to vote for? Any Republican who gets
the nomination.