On 8/14/2015 10:25 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article nv-dnR4666AWc1DInZ2dnUU7-
, says...
I was just reading this as reported by ABC news 2 days ago:
------------------
"The last batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State
Department included one from Clinton asking to borrow a book called
?Send: Why People Email So Badly and How to Do It Better,? by David
Shipley and Will Schwalbe.
When I was in the corporate world I went to a
mandatory "writing" class that was very useful.
They used a book which I think was called "Put it in
Writing." That really improved my memo writing
skills, and even bled into project documents.
Email is easy. Stick to business.
HRC of course mixed business with personal.
----------------------
The ABC article also include an image of the email reply to Hillary from
Cheryl Mills (State staff member) This is the content:
-----------------
From: Mills, Cheryl D
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2009 8:25 PM
To: H
Subject: May I borrow
Will bring tomorrow
--- Original Message ---
From: H
Sent: Tue Dec 01 19:17:57 2009
Subject: May I borrow
SEND by David Shipley?
------------------
and thus, the coverup began.
If that thumbdrive is really a backup of the server,
which is entirely possible, they will uncover
whatever was borrowed.
What do you think it was, a nuke?
I predict this will get ridiculously fantastical when
the PERSONAL emails, like the one above, are leaked
by the GOP.
Like when GWB's "chemical weapons production
facility" in Iraq was revealed to be a truck trailer
boneyard.
But have at it. Hard to stop insanity.
Given the circumstances, the info contained on her personal server while
she served as SOS is important. Equally important however is her
unwillingness to cooperate with requests to deliver them to ensure there
were no potential breaches that could affect national security or policy.
I'll give you an example that may not be so obvious. There have been
some references to imagery contained in some of the emails. The
capabilities of some government US satellite imagery is classified. If
her server contained such imagery, it must be considered to be
compromised and thus the satellite capabilities.
Again, the main issue isn't her poor judgement by not using a government
secure server. I think that early on she acknowledged that in hindsight
she probably should have used a government server for official
government correspondence as SOS. It's her foot dragging, excuses,
statements (some already proven to be false) that is the issue. The
public respects and is owed honesty and she isn't being honest.
With regard to your previous post, I apparently missed a lot of Mika's
rant this morning. I was just reading about it though. Much of her
criticism was related to Hillary's "arranged" public town hall meetings
where attendees have been carefully selected ahead of time and are
supporters of her nomination.