On 7/20/15 8:56 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 11:54 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...of several right wingers here doing?

"Under oath in a hotel — away from the TV cameras and the soapbox where
he did his public moralizing — Bill Cosby sketched a very different image
of America's Dad: a philanderer who plied young women with quaaludes,
claimed to be adept at reading their unspoken desires and tried to use
his wealth to keep "Mrs. Cosby" in the dark.

"The portrait comes from Cosby's own words in a transcript of a 2005-06
deposition taken in Philadelphia. It is the only publicly available
testimony he has given in response to accusations he drugged and sexually
assaulted dozens of women over four decades. Cosby has denied the
allegations, calling the sexual contact consensual."

- - -

Speak up, fellas, those of you who were defending Cosby and his moralizing...

Actually I think the judge who released,the deposition should be disbarred.
I think the judge broke the law. Was a sealed agreement between Cosby and
the plaintiffs. Does not address my feelings about Cosby, but the judge
was truly out of line.



From what little I've seen of the incident, The Associated Press went to
court to get the deposition released. I haven't seen the filings or any
transcript of the court proceedings, but as a result of the filing, a
judge ordered the deposition released. It isn't likely the judge "broke
the law," as judges have discretion to do these sorts of things.

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.

The commented he released the deposition because Cosby had stated on
morality. Seems as if had little to do with law in the release.


Hey, feel free to argue with a sitting federal judge, and see what the
outcome is, eh?