On Saturday, 6 June 2015 16:58:19 UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


In Harry's case, they would probably look at him like a canary in a coal mine...trying to call out to warn people of impending disaster looming just out of sight....and that would be personal greed and corruption.
In Dickson's case...they would see him exactly as he is..a pathetic pervert desperate for attention...any attention.
What side do you want to be seen on, Kalif??