On 6/4/2015 9:18 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/4/15 8:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/4/2015 7:46 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:





Laws restricting abortion and other womens' health issues; legislation
restricting access to state or federal health care programs;
restrictions against gays/lesbians; defunding of Planned Parenthood;
climate change denial; anti-immigrant regulations; pushing evangelism in
the public school...

The list is a long one. You may not see as much of it up in
Massachusetts, which has far fewer christian crazies than other parts of
the country.


As far as I know getting an abortion is perfectly legal in the USA. The
question, as it also applies to your other cites, is who pays for them?
Is it right to mandate that taxpayers fund every issue and program
regardless of personal views? They are political issues, not
religious issues.



You're not up to speed on the abortion issue. In many red states, the
clinics that provided them have been shut down, typically by red state
governors passing rules aimed solely at shutting them down. Oh, and as
for your other comments, I was addressing the religious pressure that is
bringing about these restrictions, not their financial impact, if any.


All these social issues you clamor for come with a price tag. Luddite
merely asked who pays the bill. Your stock answer is ALWAYS "someone
with deeper pockets than Harry Krause". With all of the good fortune
you've had over the years, why don't you feel that you should pay
something back, in the form of taxes due and other things?
Please bring us up to speed on your efforts to become fiscally,
socially, ethically and morally responsible.


--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."