On 4/5/2015 12:56 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 4/5/15 12:45 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 09:40:07 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 4/5/2015 9:10 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 09:00:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 4/5/15 2:35 AM, RGrew176 wrote:
Keyser Söze;1031968 Wrote:
On 4/4/15 10:59 AM, John H. wrote:-
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 09:30:08 -0500, amdx wrote:
-
On 4/4/2015 6:16 AM, John H. wrote:-
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015 03:42:40 +0100, RGrew176
wrote:


If I am ever in Walkerton Indiana I will make a point to stop at
Memories Pizza and order myself one of their pizzas.-


-
If they did mail orders, I'd order a pot full!-


You could add the $800,000 fund that has been collected for them :-)

http://tinyurl.com/qjvs65r



Mikek
-
Damn, that's another $300K in only a day or two.
-

I'm still looking for that passage in the *new* testament where the
christian saviour says he condemns gay relationships or
marriages. Oh,
snap...he didn't say anything about that, did he? So this is all
just
latter day christian bull****.

Well a couple minutes of research I found this:

Leviticus 18:22 ESV

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 ESV

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the
kingdom of
God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters,
nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves,
nor the
greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the
kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed,
you were
sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus
Christ and
by the Spirit of our God.

Romans 1:26-28 ESV /

For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their
women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to
nature;
and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were
consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts
with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them
up to a
debased mind to do what ought not to be done.

Leviticus 20:13 ESV /

If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have
committed
an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is
upon
them.

1 Timothy 1:10 ESV /

The sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers,
liars,
perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,





You're kidding, right? I said I couldn't find any passage in the "new
testament" in which *your saviour* condemned gay relationships or
marriages.

Your saviour, Jesus, had nothing directly to say about homosexuality.
Homosexuality is not mentioned directly in the four gospels, and it is
not found in Hebrews, Revelation, Acts, et cetera. In response to the
examples you offered:

1. Leviticus predates Jesus. That’s Strike One for you.

2. Corinthians is attributed to Paul, not Jesus. Strike Two.

3. Romans, again, is the theology of Paul, not Jesus. Strike Three.

4. Leviticus, see 1, above. Predates Jesus. Strike Four.

5. Timothy 1:9-10 does not mention homosexuality, and, of course,
it is
another text written by Paul, not by Jesus. Strike Five.

You’re out. Thank you for playing.


===

Interesting. Now Harry the putz is a Christian theology expert. What
a multitalented but wasted individual.

I would like Krausie baby to prove that gayism is neither immoral nor
unnatural according to the New Testament. It shouldn't be too tough a
task for a bible expert like him, who's read the book cover to cover 3
times. Or did he say he's read from the bible 3 times? Sometines Harry's
writings are extremely ambiguous, eh? ;-)

Here's the deal. Krause is vehemently anti-Christian. He considers the
pizza parlor's
non-support of gay weddings to be more abhorrent than the murders of
scores of
students by Muslims at a Kenyan university.

That's a fact.

Given his anti-Christian attitude, his life is made even more wretched
each day as he
looks at the date and realizes the '2015' he sees represents time
after the year of
the conception or birth of Jesus of Nazareth. The 'Anno Domini' or,
more fully, 'Anno
Domini Nostri Iesu (or Jesu) Christi' has got to be eating his heart out.

Like a pile of dog ****, he's not worth much.


I'm not anti-Christian, Johnny the Racist. I'm not anti-Buddhist,
anti-Jewish, or anti-Muslim, either. My disdain for religion, any
religion, comes from the attempts of its acolytes to force its beliefs
on society in general in *this* country. It is self-described Christians
who work the hardest at that here in the disUnited States.

I don't use A.D., and I don't know anyone else who does. Sometimes I see
usage of Common Era. Besides, I'm not offended by Jesus, but I find many
of those who claim to be his followers but who are racist trash (like
you) offensive.

You really went to college, eh? Hard to believe.

It's called freedom of speech. If you find what anyone says or does,
please feel free to put him /her in your bozos bin. And please stop
whining about what you find offensive. You'd be surprised to find out
how few people give a **** about your preferences.

PS: Did you get your new Apple Dick Tracy watch yet?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."