|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2015
Posts: 118
|
|
It's not about servers
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/5/15 8:34 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/5/2015 8:21 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/5/15 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send
and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not
operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping
system."
And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as
SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.
And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails
- I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.
She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.
You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.
The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own.
Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email
address
for these correspondences.
Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all
been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?
First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.
What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.
It's Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi of course with Trey Gowdy trying to
gin up his reputation.
It has nothing to do with Benghazi and everything to do with compliance
to regulations, honesty and trustworthiness. Hillary is not exactly a
shining example of any of those. Sorry for being rather closed minded
about her but I think she's a snake in the grass and in no way qualified
to be POTUS. That is unless having the first woman president is more
important than anything else.
I wouldn't trust any of the current GOP POTUS wannabes with anything
more serious than lacing up a pair of shoes.
That's a response or are you also disgusted with the liberal potentials?
|