On 2/27/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:41:23 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 2/27/2015 9:43 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 8:11 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:45:18 -0500, Someone
wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:45:20 -0500, Someone
wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/23/15 11:08 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:07:39 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:
Greg you're right but I'm thinking more of a dedicated pistol
instead of a cut down bullpup
This is just a way to sidestep the ATF short barrel rifle law. You
notice they call those stumpy stocks a "brace" too. Some of these
things accept AR style accessories so you could put a telescoping M4
shoulder stock on most of them but you are then making a "hold your
nose legal" gun illegal.
I think they make these things, just because they can and I am not
really sure what they are good for.
One of the guys I occasionally see out in Virginia has one of
those AR
type pistols. I shot a few rounds out of it once. I agree...I have no
idea what they are good for, aside from bragging rights.
You live for bragging rights. It's been displayed here ad nauseam.
He'll be showing us pictures of 'his' soon enough.
Not now that you predicted it!
His will be much better than a Sig Sauer.
SIG makes some fine firearms, but I found another brand more accurate in
9 mm.
Did you really? That's a pretty broad stroke you brush. It's really too
dumb a statement to call it an outright lie.
He knows I own a couple Sigs.
And remember, he owned the most expensive Sig pistol made. Of course, the CZ 75 was
much more accurate.
I bought, used, competed with and sold my SIG X5 before, I believe, you
had *any* SIGs. It was a fine firearm, but for me and many other
competitors, the competition, custom CZ SP01 Shadow was a faster cycler
and more accurate.
Despite what you think, the world is not about you and your inability to
shoot the firearms you own.
--
Proud to be a Liberal.