Harry Krause wrote:
K Smith wrote:


Gould 0738 wrote:

Sure is good to run across a well-run outfit. Is Pacific Diesel going to do
the rebuild for you?

jps


Looks likely. I got the non-binding estimate to remove and replace the engine
today. Close to $7k. About what I expected. Now, if only that included any
portion of the engine itself!



Wow I know that's just the going rate & make no comment on the people
but it just seems like such a lot of money.


Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. How would *you* know, one way or the other?
It's not as if you do that kind of work and know what to charge for it.


How would I know?? gee there's lots of ways, but I guess what you in
your uneducated manner really want to ask is; why would my On Topic
comment even be allowed in a public NG, yes??? I mean I've never made
"claims" certainly don't intend to start now, however I'm more than
happy to have my NG performance reviewed, it's all in the archives for
anyone who wants to check & I actively invite same.

Gee lets see just few to wet your appetite hey???

I was able to educate the OMC dealers as to how their own engines
actually worked to control idle speed?? Even some that claimed a life
time working on them (seems OMC never bothered to tell them:-)) Took a
while but was finally proven correct on all grounds.

I was able to warn the group that a few of the them were lying about
their knowledge, so called training & their BS about dealer markups.
Took a while but was finally proven correct on all grounds.

I was able to well in advance predict Ficht & to a lesser extent
Optimax wouldn't work & gave detailed reasons why, even though the lying
dealers & you were screaming your heads off to the contrary. Took a long
while but was finally proven correct on all grounds.

I was able to show that another of your lying mates who claimed to be a
marine diesel engineer didn't even have the faintest clue as to how a
marine diesel operates, didn't even know that diesels advance the
injection timing as the revs rise. Took no time at all & proven correct
on all grounds.

So accept what I say or no, I don't care & never have. However I do
post so what I say is on the record.

But my greatest service to the group thus far is to alert people that
you are a liar who does not own a boat & never has, who has concocted
endless lies over the years to pretend you are something you clearly are
not. Your lies are not "harmless" indeed your lies have cost many from
rec. boats real money in buying defective motors from your dealer mates
& of course your real life stalking of female NG members was the final
confirmation of the actual danger you are.

I did post abridged summaries of your lies which of course you could
never deny, however being the liar you are you did try once, just once
to deny you ever even posted some of them.Oops that reminds me you
didn't answer the other day (liars rarely do when caught yet again:-))
but are you now saying the pic you put up as your Hatt 43 was indeed
"your" Hatt 43?? you know convertible, corinthian leather etc etc I
mean when it was disclosed as a fake from a website you said it was a
pic of a "sistership", just out of interest which is it???

Your current lies about the 36 ft lobster boat & the Parker are
following your standard pattern lots of BS about it but no actual owners
info, just more of the crap you gather from the web about recalls
updates etc etc , you're a sick liar.

K