Thread: Very Refreshing
View Single Post
  #68   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Califbill Califbill is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Very Refreshing

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 10:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM,
wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting
for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those
who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation.
You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a
time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable.



Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would
stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to
take away his guns.

I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths
here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I
stop and talk to them for grins every few years.


===

As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and
figuratively.


Hey, you want to give up your life to protect your guns, you go right
ahead. I'll watch you do it on the evening news. Me, I'd rather go to the
beach. Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing.



I think it is the complete rights we are guaranteed via our constitution
that most are worried about losing.