Several times, when questioned on TV during his campaign about his reading
habits, he was unable to point to much of anything other than the occasional
newspaper. I don't expect the president to have a reading list I agree 100%
with, but newspapers do NOT inform ANYONE enough about politics and history.
The latter is especially important, if you want to avoid repeating the worst
parts of it. I wonder if Bush even read his dad's book.

"Bill Cole" wrote in message
et...
All presidents use their staff to present daily briefing papers to get an
overview of world events. The briefing papers combine the info that is in
the newspapers and info from the different cabinets and intelligence
communities.

What is amazing is that he bothered to tell anyone he does not read
newspapers, even if other presidents did not bother to read anymore than
the
headlines to see what the media considers important, at least they didn't
tell everyone.


"F330 GT" wrote in message
...
I usually try to stay out of the poltical bashing that goes on here but
paragraphs 6 of this article blows my mind. Hard to believe this is
about
our
president. Is he a freaking idiot or just stupid. This is a direct
quote.
Why
would he admit to this?


FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES:

The Presidential Bubble

Published: September 25, 2003



Four progressive political groups sued the Bush administration this
week,
charging that the Secret Service is systematically keeping protesters
away
from
the president's public appearances. They make a serious point about free
speech
rights, but they also point out a disturbing aspect of the Bush White
House:
the country has a chief executive who seems to embrace the presidential
bubble.

Security concerns make it inevitable that a modern American president
will
be
somewhat cut off from the country he leads. He cannot insert himself
into
any
part of normal life without a phalanx of security guards.

Protesters cannot be permitted to get close enough to pose a threat, but
they
ought to be able to get close enough so the president can see that they
are
there. Sometimes seeing a glimpse of placard-wielding demonstrators is
as
close
as the commander in chief can get to seeing the face of national
discontent.

At Mr. Bush's public appearances, his critics are routinely shunted into
"protest zones" as much as a half-mile away. At the Columbia, S.C.,
airport
last year, a protester with a "No War for Oil" sign was ordered to move
a
half-mile from the area where Mr. Bush's supporters were allowed to
stand.
When
the protester refused, he was arrested.

Mr. Bush and his aides also seem to go to great lengths to underline the
degree
to which the president closes himself off from the news media. In an
interview
with Fox News this week, the president said he learned most of what he
needs to
know from morning briefings by his national security adviser,
Condoleezza
Rice,
and his chief of staff, Andrew Card.

As for newspapers, Mr. Bush said, "I glance at the headlines" but
"rarely
read
the stories." The people who brief him on current events encounter many
of
the
newsmakers personally, he said, and in any case "probably read the news
themselves."

Some of this may be a pose that is designed to tweak the media by making
the
news appear to be below the president's notice. During the Iraqi
invasion,
when
the rest of the nation was glued to TV, Mr. Bush's spokesman claimed
that
his
boss had barely glanced at the pictures of what was going on.

But it is worrisome when one of the most incurious men ever to occupy
the
White
House takes pains to insist that he gets his information on what the
world
is
saying only in predigested bits from his appointees.

Mr. Bush thinks of himself as a man of the people, but carefully staged
contacts with groups of supporters or small children does not constitute
getting in touch with the people. It is in Mr. Bush's interest, as well
as
the
nation's, for him to burst the bubble he has been inhabiting, and take a
hard
look at the real world.



P.S. My last politcal post unless GWB shoots himself in the foot.
(again)

Barry