On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:05:27 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 7:54 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:24:28 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.

===

I find that less abhorent than his stated desire to have an
incompetent idealogue in a high public office.


If you are referring to Louis Gohmert and my comment about him, he
already is in high public office.

It is an interesting phenomenon that so many Republican officeholders
and wannabes at all levels are like Gohmert in so many ways. I am not
saying there are no bat**** crazy Dems, but not nearly as many as in the
GOP.

Given the ratio of pro-liberal to pro-conservative media, you would
expect to hear about 8 times as many anti-Republican stories as
anti-Democrat stories.