BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Keyser Söze

wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:21:11 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/13/14 8:13 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:13:09 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/13/14 1:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:42:43 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:07:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

The only good thing that could become of that is that it might give a
sane third party candidate a fighting chance. It's doubtful though.
Too many people have the ingrained habit of voting straight Democratic
or straight Republican without giving any real thought to the actual
candidates. Trying to get legislation through congress would also be
a nightmare for a 3rd party president unless they had tremendous
leadership ability at the grass roots level.

The people who buy themselves a president every 4 years does not want
to have any 3d parties in the mix. They control the democrats and
republicans. They go out of their way not to open up any opportunity
for competition.
After Perot, you have to be a member of the team to even get to the
debates. They don't like embarrassing questions.
Harry is a symptom of the problem, simply declaring anyone who doesn't
toe his party line as being loony or nuts.

Yet another moronic statement from you. I don't think Jeb Bush is
loony/nuts. I don't think Chris Christie is loony/nuts. I don't think
Jon Huntsman is loony/nuts. I don't think Mitt Romney is loony/nuts.
None of these Republicans are candidates for whom I would vote, but not
because I think they are insane or don't adhere to the "party line,"
whatever that is, I support.

I can't see Warren gaining traction for the Democratic nomination. I
think she's great as a U.S. Senator, though.

I don't see myself voting for loonytarians, though. They're just
Republicans with less sense of civic responsibility.

What part of "3d party" did you have trouble comprehending?
You really have a hard time keeping up.

I was commenting on your silly slam that I consider anyone who isn't
lined up with the Democratic party line as "loony or nuts." That's just
more of your simple-minded political bull****.

Read the whole note again

As for a "sane third party candidate," I can't think of one with any
standing who has what it takes to get anywhere in a nominating or
electoral process. Certainly no loonytarians.

You have drunk the Kool Ade. The world is black or white for you and
it is just democrats and republicans. Anyone who does not fit on one
box or the other is simply loony.
Perhaps if you actually looked you would see libertarians pick planks
from both sides to create a platform, that promotes true liberty
A government that is not only out of your bedroom, that you support
but also out of your wallet, that the republicans support
They also want to stop military adventurism and neither party wants to
do that.
A lot of bribes come along with that $800 Billion dollar DoD budget

Just how much loonytarian koolaid have you had?
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+