On 12/11/14 9:07 AM, Toad Gig wrote:

Again, an answer from a corner position.

The accidental running over of the pedestrain had no morality
associated therewith - it was an accident, pure and simple.

My shooting you between the eyes, on the other hand, was an *immoral*
act, although most of society would disagree.

If you believe there is 'no morality' associated with either act, then
you should not be using the term 'higher moral ground'. Using your
logic, there would be no such thing.

Most toads will pee when picked up, but I'm wondering if they pee when
backed into a corner. Did you wet your pants, Toad?



Johnny, Johnny, Johnny...

1. You've got to do something about the evil bile that rises up in your
throat every morning. Perhaps you can add sex to your list of hobbies,
if you can find a woman who will accommodate you. If not, try one of
your right-wing buddies here for a reach-around or better.

2. You are not clever and your attempts here to appear so have the
opposite effect.

3. You're not in the army anymore and therefore are in no position to
demand responses that suit you, or even whether you get a response.

4. You obviously did not understand my comment about losing the high
moral ground by the ways we sometimes wage war.

As always, have another in your never-ending series of Johnny in a Daze.


--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.