On 12/4/2014 9:42 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:30:57 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 9:23 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:51:17 -0500, KC wrote:

On 12/4/2014 3:53 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:55:32 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 10:25 AM, KC wrote:
On 12/4/2014 10:23 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:46:21 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


Poco Loco;1020850 Wrote:
....not the chokehold.

Guess they didn't read the coroner's report.

http://tinyurl.com/p8ggn2g
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

....Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)

Make that the illegal choke hold. The choke hold had been banned by the
NYCPD some time ago. I think the grand jury got this one wrong.

I was pointing out the 'union' position. Either the cop was wrong or
the union is wrong. I'll let the liberals sort that one out.

But, the fact still remains that the choke hold was not against the
law. It was against NYPD 'policy' for which the GJ cannot indict.
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

...Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)


It may not have been a "choke" hold at all, but just a hold... In
fairness where else on that guy could you get your arm around him? In
most of the video, the elbow, not the forearm is across the throat. If
he was talking, he was breathing... every perp says "you're breaking my
arm, or you're choking me". The cops can not let go, I have gone over
that before...


You have obviously been watching and listening to Peter King.
Almost
word for word what he's been promoting, especially on Fox News.




Similar comments were made on CNN. No one argued with him about it. Do
you think he is lying?

Please don't take anything dick says about me or my sources as fact, in
fact based on his record here lately, you can pretty much dismiss
anything he says about me as just another harryism, dick is still
wondering why nobody stands around and claps for his dissertations here
anymore, poor guy.

Seems when dick finds himself woefully uninformed, he writes off what I
say any way he can.. Of course a few months later when he finally
catches up, I don't expect an apology...
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

...Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)



I wasn't really expecting an answer from him.
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

...Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)



Not worth answering.

Why not? You've made several (disparaging?) comments about him. Do you
think he's lying?

BTW John, I don't know if you did this on purpose or not but the way
you have your "signature" formatted results in it not being deleted in
replies. You recently commented on this wondering why it keep showing up.

Thanks. I asked the question because my attempt to do fix it failed.

I've been deleting it manually but I left it as is in this reply.

Formatted properly the signature is usually stripped by most newsreaders
including Thunderbird which I am using.

I can honestly understand why you might find it disagreeable.
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

...Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)



Doesn't bother me at all Clara. I was going to tell you what's wrong
with the formatting but decided to let you figure it out.