On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:58:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/25/14 4:54 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:48:58 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



This isn't the forum to admit this but I have to agree with Ben Crump
and Al Sharpton (hell just froze over) that the way this was handled by
the prosecuting attorney with the Grand Jury wasn't right.

Doesn't justify the violence and burnings for sure. I think some people
look for any excuse for violence, looting and destruction of property.

The lawyers on CNN are saying that if anything the prosecutor put more
than the normal amount of testimony into evidence, Normally they don't
really introduce anything that does not advance their theory of the
case in a normal indictment.
They did say that was not unusual on a police shooting case.

Justice was not what these people wanted. They just wanted a
conviction and due process was not supposed to enter into it.



Grand juries indict. Juries convict.

Mostly true, except that around here you libs had the guy convicted
well before the grand jury began deliberating. Perhaps you don't
recall. Seems like you folks did a similar thing here a while back.

So you should have said:

Grand juries indict. Juries and liberals convict.