On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:41:35 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/18/14 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:50:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/18/14 12:51 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:22:10 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:




If you mean the palins, they are not subsistence hunters. I have no idea
who the "motor city mad man" is. I have no objection to, for example,
tribesmen who hunt because it is the only way they can feed themselves
and their families. You really should stop coming to conclusions based
upon your wild-assed guesses.

So someone who just hunts to supplement their income is evil?
Do you feel the same about gardening?

Personally I do not see much difference between shooting a deer and
paying Giant food to kill a steer, butcher and wrap it for me.
Both are going to be a dead mammal that we cook and eat.




*My* point was that there is no morality in non-subsistence hunting. If
a family with very little money can put food on the table or have
something to sell or trade by hunting, then *that* is subsistence hunting.

You don't seem to understand the point.

Maybe I do.

If the hunter is eating the game, it is subsistence hunting.

Not by the normal definition of subsistence hunting.


TOAD, you don't hunt. What makes you think you know so much about the
subject?

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life,
but it does make you against baby killing.

Other bull**** snipped.