|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2014
Posts: 580
|
|
Well ....
On 11/18/2014 6:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/18/14 12:51 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:22:10 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
If you mean the palins, they are not subsistence hunters. I have no idea
who the "motor city mad man" is. I have no objection to, for example,
tribesmen who hunt because it is the only way they can feed themselves
and their families. You really should stop coming to conclusions based
upon your wild-assed guesses.
So someone who just hunts to supplement their income is evil?
Do you feel the same about gardening?
Personally I do not see much difference between shooting a deer and
paying Giant food to kill a steer, butcher and wrap it for me.
Both are going to be a dead mammal that we cook and eat.
*My* point was that there is no morality in non-subsistence hunting. If
a family with very little money can put food on the table or have
something to sell or trade by hunting, then *that* is subsistence hunting.
You don't seem to understand the point.
Simply put, your moral code is extremely fluid and revolves around your
current activities and habits. Give us a few examples of what is moral,
amoral and immoral, according to the gospel of Harry Krause.
|