On 11/17/2014 11:17 PM, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Monday, November 17, 2014 7:22:13 PM UTC-8, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/17/14 10:12 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:08:37 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/17/14 7:39 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:51:11 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/17/14 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:23:51 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Last time I went duck hunting was on the Indian River just south of
Merritt Is, FL. Got a bunch. Little buggers, not mallards for sure.


How brave. Big, strong, brave old fart shoots ducks.

That line only works if you are eating tofu wearing a cardboard belt.
Otherwise you just hire out your animal murder and you do not have any
moral authority at all..


There's no morality in non-subsistence hunting.

So you think the factory farm is morally better? OK but as Bill
pointed out, if it wasn't for hunters and groups like Ducks Unlimited,
we would have far less habitat and far fewer ducks, That one
organization does more than PETA, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace
combined to preserve natural habitat.
I don't hunt but I do recognize what hunters bring to the
environmental community.


Try reading for content. My comment was about non-subsistence hunting.
You might consider stopping your habit of reaching for conclusions out
of a silk top hat.

Subsistence hunting is not even the issue although there are plenty of
hunters like the Alaskans you love to hate and the Motor City Mad Man
who do eat from their hunts more than they buy at the store.
You are against hunting in all forms and you just pulled this
subsistence thing out of your silk hat.
The fact still remains that hunters do more for wildlife than PETA and
the rest of the people who raise funds, just to buy more TV ads to
raise more funds.



If you mean the palins, they are not subsistence hunters.

Think again, genius. That is if you're able.

http://us4palin.com/accomplishments/...complishments/


Harry can only think on an empty stomach.