View Single Post
  #287   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
F*O*A*D F*O*A*D is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/17/14 8:16 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:57:01 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/16/14 4:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 15:31:45 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

Aside from the societal good that will come of what you propose, the
best thing about it is that it drives gun nutzies like herring, bar,
w'hine and greg...nuttier.

===

You probably have more guns than any of us.


I wouldn't know, but it's not the number of firearms one owns that makes
one a gunnutzi, it's the objection to licensing owners and creating a
paper trail for every firearm. I am strongly in favor of both, along
with mandatory training before getting aforementioned license.

My firearms collection is fairly small by any "collector's" standard.


Bull****, Harry, it's the failure to suck up to Luddite, which you are
working at strenuously.

I've always favored licensing of gun owners and registration of firearms.

As a former army officer, you'd be the expert in suck up. I can't think
of a job that requires more suck up than being an officer in the military.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.