View Single Post
  #311   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Poco Loco Poco Loco is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Default Had to share this story

On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:24:22 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:22:51 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 10/31/2014 12:06 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:26:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:18:35 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/31/2014 9:02 AM, Poco Loco wrote:

I've not seen a whole lot of fighting over background checks.

Are you serious? You apparently have a short memory.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/17/background-checks-bill_n_3103341.html

What I beleive he meant is that the American public hasn't been railing against background checks. Your linked article even points out that the measure had a 90% public approval rating. It was the politicians that didn't get the job done.

They really do not explain what "universal background check" means.

If they explained that I could not give my wife a shotgun for
christmas without her submitting to a background check and having a
federally licensed person do the "transfer", they might get a better
feel for it.
If I just buy the gun myself and give it to her with a bow on it under
the tree, I am a "straw buyer" and she is an illegal gun owner.



I think the main issue is making unreported sales of firearms at gun
shows and similar venues. I remember one reporter who was able to buy
anything he wanted at a show with no check, no questions asked.


How many crime guns have actually been traced to a gun show?
You do understand a licensed dealer still needs to record "private"
sales I suppose.


That's one of Harry's big lines, but I've yet to see all the back up
reports of same.