Thread
:
Had to share this story
View Single Post
#
311
posted to rec.boats
Poco Loco
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,344
Had to share this story
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:24:22 -0400,
wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:22:51 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
On 10/31/2014 12:06 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:26:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Friday, October 31, 2014 9:18:35 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/31/2014 9:02 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
I've not seen a whole lot of fighting over background checks.
Are you serious? You apparently have a short memory.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/17/background-checks-bill_n_3103341.html
What I beleive he meant is that the American public hasn't been railing against background checks. Your linked article even points out that the measure had a 90% public approval rating. It was the politicians that didn't get the job done.
They really do not explain what "universal background check" means.
If they explained that I could not give my wife a shotgun for
christmas without her submitting to a background check and having a
federally licensed person do the "transfer", they might get a better
feel for it.
If I just buy the gun myself and give it to her with a bow on it under
the tree, I am a "straw buyer" and she is an illegal gun owner.
I think the main issue is making unreported sales of firearms at gun
shows and similar venues. I remember one reporter who was able to buy
anything he wanted at a show with no check, no questions asked.
How many crime guns have actually been traced to a gun show?
You do understand a licensed dealer still needs to record "private"
sales I suppose.
That's one of Harry's big lines, but I've yet to see all the back up
reports of same.
Reply With Quote
Poco Loco
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Poco Loco