On 10/30/2014 8:26 PM, KC wrote:

On 10/30/2014 6:14 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/30/2014 5:58 PM, KC wrote:



Deciding I was a tea party supporter because I mentioned "Dana". BTW, I
never said Dana Loash (sp), and I never said I supported the "Dana" at
all. Your arrogance let you decide who I was talking about, that I must
be a supporter, and that that made me a Tea Party Supporter... then your
insecurity really made you lash out at the lady... Could have been
talking about Dana Perino, I never really said but I guess it wouldn't
matter, you already got all the info that supports your point of vie..
er um, all you need... lol... For such a rich guy, you are pretty
narrow... for sure...


You are so full of **** it's unbelievable.
Funny though.



Your words... "...you are a tea party supporter, noted". You are
starting to act like harry krause.


First, there is no question as to which "Dana" you were referring to.
IIRC you referenced the interview with her that happened to be on
FoxNews. It was the only way I found out who she was.

Yes, I've concluded you are a Tea Party supporter based on your numerous
references and endorsements of Tea Party politicians and your many
references of admiration for FoxNews celebrities like Shawn Hannity.
You've lectured me to get news from sources other than MSNBC. I do. I
watch FoxNews to get their flavor on current events or subjects. I also
watch MSNBC, CNN and a couple of the major broadcast networks to get
their "flavor". You seem to only reference FoxNews as the only
reliable "news" source.

Given all that, I have concluded you are indeed a Tea Party supporter.
Nothing wrong with that ... it's your choice.

If I am wrong, I extend my apologies.