On 8/26/2014 1:26 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 20:49:49 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:02:48 -0700, jps wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 09:33:53 -0400, BAR wrote:
Please explain the cops injuries to his head and face, which occurred
prior to the cop shooting the 6'4" 300 man.
Not the issue. By *all* accounts, the kid was retreating.
100% total bull****, period... the *only* account of him retreating is
the kid who robbed the store with him you idiot...
You cannot
shoot an unarmed person while they're retreating, it's murder.
All of the shots were in the front. If this was in the back I would
agree with you although Missouri does allow a cop to shoot a fleeing
forcible felon. The cop did get the radio call about the "strong
armed robbery" and that is a "B" felony.
Bull****, no connection. The contact had nothing whatsoever to do
with a robbery.
The kid was not a felon, not even a suspect. He dissed a white cop
who felt justified in taking his rage out on that kid. He's a cold
blooded murderer.
Witnesses have the cop 20 - 25 feet away. Cops are not given
permission by MO law to fire on a suspect without their lives being
threatened. This was murder.
I don't know where you're getting your information, but it's a bad
source.
You are just making it up as you go along...