"Spelling corrector" not "spell checker."

-- frosty

JR North wrote:
Spell checkers don't count. They are simply a dictionary
lookup.
JR

frosty wrote:

Computers have been doing this for some time, JR.

Every see a spelling corrector? I wrote one long
before the 'fuzzy logic' term was even coined.

Even Outlook Express' F7 key corrected 27 of the
wrods, below. Or was it tihrty-sveen? Lsot Conut.

-- frosty

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer
in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng
is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset
can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

-- frosty

JR North wrote:
Wrong. It's 'fuzzy logic". When computers can do this, it
will be the next Great Leap Forward.
JR

CCred68046 wrote:

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer
in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng
is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset
can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm.
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by
istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth