BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

F*O*A*D

On 7/15/14, 4:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:30:00 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:53:03 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Sheesh. It doesn't matter what Bill *might* have done or what Hillary
voted for...

If Hillary and 27 other democrats had not voted for the invasion,
there would not have been one.
In fact 11 could have stopped it with a filibuster but they had 77
votes. with 2 abstaining.

So what? Senate Dems voted 29-21 for it. Their votes for it cost both
Kerry and Clinton the Presidency.
Senate Reps voted 48-1 for it.
Whats your point? Wait... Got it.
The Iraq war was the Democrats doing.
Okay. Run with it.

It was certainly the fault of the 27 who put them over 50%+1 or even
the 11 who made the issue filibuster proof.
That is just how the Senate works. It is ironic when you look at the
people who voted for it and where they are today.
Bush and Cheney seem to be the only ones who took any heat for it.

I do find it strange Harry has such a crush on Hillary tho.
She is a confirmed neocon who says her favorite book is the bible.

There isn't a single Republican interested in the 2016 nomination with a
ghost of a chance of getting it that I would trust as the local dogcatcher.

--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.