|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
|
|
Well Ray....
On 7/13/14, 11:10 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:47:04 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:
The big difference is that while Clinton talked the talk, Bush walked
the walk.
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/
Precisely. Clinton talked about the problems with Iraq but was smart
enough not to invade it and stick around, while Bush was dumb enough to
be talked into invading Iraq and sticking around. Clinton was smart
while Bush was...Bush.
Clinton was extremely lucky that his term was over in 2001 instead of
2002 or he would have been placed in the position of having to back up
his rhetoric or back down.
Al Gore lights a candle every day thanking the SCOTUS for Bush v Gore.
How do you think things would have worked out if Saddam was still in
Baghdad?
The apologeticas for Bush just never end. 
--
Republicans . . . the anti-immigrant, anti-contraception, anti-student,
anti-middle class, pro-impeachment party that shut down the government
last year for no reason.
|