On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 07:35:34 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:

On 6/13/2014 7:17 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:56:28 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:38:20 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:43:28 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:04:20 -0700, jps wrote:

Inner city folks have been taught their chances of success are limited
by the color of their skin and their languge.

===

Language? Really?

What language is that?

You really that dense or do you just play dumb? Would you rather I
said elocution, syntax and vocabulary? Their communites are isolated
from greater society, not by choice.

How are their communities isolated from greater society? Do they not
have TV's, cable service, no smart phones? Aren't they taught be good
union teachers? Just how are they isolated from from greater society?

jps tends to ignore troublesome questions that get to the facts.

Did you hear that California Supreme Court handed down a ruling saying
that teacher tenure is contrary to a good public school education.

I posted the link to that story a few days ago. The unions out there are definitely ****ed, which in
itself means the judge made a good call.

Was that a ruling or an opinion?

I thought it was a ruling.

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21604201-stunning-defeat-teachers-unions-california-brown-v-board-sequel

Of course, the liberal LA Times doesn't like it much:

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-teacher-tenure-trial-20140612-column.html

But, if the LA Times and teachers' unions are against it, it must be a good ruling.