On 5/11/2014 6:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/11/14, 5:57 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/11/2014 5:51 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/11/14, 5:09 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
Her "excuse":
"I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I
misspoke,
that was just a misstatement," she said.
Sorta like, "What difference does it make".
All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators.
That goes for Republicans too.
Just don't have a target yet.
It'll be fun when the target appears.
I expect it to be a real big target.
Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of
the
truth.
Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000
words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000).
Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of
the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets
make it
*10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even
close to a "million words a day".
What in the name of hell are you talking about?
You must really be afraid of her to bring up such nonsense.
Oh well.
There's no doubt the Republicans are terrified of Mrs. Clinton.
I doubt "terrified" is an accurate term, but it sure invokes some spin
to the cycle.
I think terrified is appropriate. If the GOPers nominates one of their
crazies, he will lose. Demographic changes are working against the GOP,
and that will continue. Meanwhile, the party is pretty much locked into
the Tea Party/Ultraconservative stance it has been developing since 2008.
The GOPers are perceived, and pretty much correctly, as:
anti womens' rights
anti raising the minimum wage
anti science
anti immigration reform
anti health care coverage for the less wealthy
anti helping out students with huge student loan balances
anti spending heavily on rebuilding superstructure
anti worker
anti union
anti bank reform
anti separation of church and state
anti meaningful firearms reform
anti black
anti latino
anti a role for the federal government
anti environment
And a few more.
So, what groups are going to vote for a crazed GOP nominee?
Rich white folks
Dumb rednecks
racists
men who dislike women
I don't know who will rescue the GOP from itself. The nomination won't
go to Jon Huntsman.
We were talking about the moral competency of Hillary Clinton to serve
as POTUS. As usual, you take advantage of that discussion to start
spewing your typical anti-GOP political spin BS.
As the assumed nominee Hillary backers are promoting her as if she's the
second coming of FDR or JFK but with the added component as the first
woman to break the presidential glass ceiling.
But what exactly does Hillary bring to the table? Lots of talk. Many
lies. Dems don't like to talk about it but her years as Sec. of State
were not exactly productive nor was her performance extraordinary in any
way. I get a big kick out of the spinsters who love to call her "one
of the best" Sec. of State in recent history. Give me a break.
What exactly did she accomplish? Nada. Zip. In fact, she may have
been asleep at the wheel, causing more lying and cover ups necessary.
Nope. You can have her.