Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:39 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a
revolver
because Matt Dillon had one?



I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor
Matt
Dillon.

Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional
character
in Gunsmoke.

I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8

What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in
.223?
Killing mice in the field?


You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests,
hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree
with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by
anyone
else on the planet.

You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are
much
better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in.





You've reached the wrong conclusion...again.


What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other
than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests?


I might take your comments a tad more seriously if you also aimed them
at others here as you do at me.


Sorry Harry. I've been a participate of this newsgroup for a long
time. I know what came first, the chicken or the egg.


His rebuttal is something you would hear on a playground.