View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
F*O*A*D F*O*A*D is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.

On 3/20/14, 3:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:23:23 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/20/14, 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:37:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/20/14, 12:15 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:27:44 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/20/14, 1:51 AM,
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:15:34 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,


I wish people would stop using that term. The particular piece of
legislation that carries that name really addresses a number of
employment practices and it is not specifically about women.

It basically lifts the normal 2 year sunset on civil actions when just
about any kind of employment rights are violated and applies equally
to men or women.

The only reason Lily was involved at all was because her beef was
raised over 2 years AFTER she retired but there were other
complainants but she was the most sympathetic.



Indeed, it does address the issue of unequal pay for equal work, and it
does extend the time period for filing a complaint.

It is clear you never actually read the legislation.
It is a short bill, you can handle it. "Equal pay for women" is never
mentioned or even alluded to
It simply opens up the window that ANYONE can bring an action.


So? You think it has nothing to do with women being able to bring action
for not getting equal pay?

Naive.

No more so than men who were discriminated against and specifically
protects old people who were discriminated against in the major part
of the bill that I didn't quote.

The word "woman/women" is never even used and there is nothing that
makes it specifically about women.
The only reference to Ledbetter was in the introduction of the bill
and points out that she lost her suit in the SCOTUS simply because of
the timing of the law suit. The intent of the bill was to expand that
window.


Of course I favor "covering" workers who were screwed out of equal pay
for equal work by employers. That the act does not mention "women" is
not relevant to its purpose.


In other words, Harry is saying, "Whoops, I ****ed up."


Moron.

--
Rand Paul & Ted Cruz…your 2016 GOP nominees, because ‘Mericans deserve
crazy!