Richard Ferguson wrote:
I do not buy your argument at all. If the issue was center of gravity,
the trunk of my body, where most of the weight was, did not move when I
pulled my legs out of the water. Also my legs were on the deck, just a
few inches above the waterline, so the change in center of gravity was
minimal. However, the effect on stability was extremely dramatic. (I am
less than 6 feet tall, so my center of gravity is not unusually high.)
In other words, I can't see how a very small change in the center of
gravity could effect a dramatic change in boat stability. There has to
be another cause.

Nope - with your legs in the water, your CG is definitely lower - and
near the pivot point for the cylinder on which you are sitting. When
you move your feet up into the well, now everything is at or above the
pivot point. A regular kayak keeps a significant amount of your weight
below that pivot point and makes the kayak much more stable. I know
this oversimplifies the math, but that's my .02 and I'm stickin' to it:-)
Remember that this was a sit on top type of kayak, kind of like a
surfboard with depresions for the butt and feet. Most of the kayak was
underwater even before I pulled my legs out of the water. I think that
part of what happened was that the extra weight of my legs put even more
of the kayak under the water, and that affected the hull design. It
started to look more like a submarine than a conventional boat.
Depending on the particular type of surf ski, many of them are about
like balancing on a bowling ball. Many of the competition skis are
18-19" wide, and take hours of practice to ride successfully, much less
get used to paddling with a wing paddle. The extra height above the
water gives you a lot better leverage once you get used to sitting
balanced on such a skinny boat, and they are darned fast when paddled
right.

Marsh
Minnesota

Sounds like you guys have made up your mind that CG is the issue, and
that adding weight to a boat can't possibly make it unstable, and that I
don't know what I am talking about, so I think I am wasting my
breath/typing.

Let me make one last try to support my position.

1. My friend, who is kind of a skinny guy, but is about the same height,
had no problem with the kayak. He is not an expert kayaker. We later
went out offshore into some waves in the Pacific ocean, he in that kayak
and me paddling a windsurfer hull, neither of us had problems, we went
snorkeling, and then climbed back on and paddled back in. This was not
an ultra-narrow high performance narrow sit on top, it was a cheap
recreational type of sit on top, which one would expect to be pretty stable.

2. If the center of gravity is the issue, how come my buddy had no
problem with the boat, and I could not keep it upright for 10 seconds in
flat water, once I lifted my legs out of the water? I am not that bad a
paddler, and since he is the same height, his center of gravity would be
about the same. But maybe you guys think that I am not only incorrect,
but an incompetent paddler. That is probably the only way you can
logically defend your position.

3. He warned me before I tried it that I would probably have trouble
with the boat, that I was too heavy for the boat. He said that his
daughter usually used the boat, and the boat was probably sized more for
her than 200 pound men.

The only way to settle this issue scientifically would be to take that
boat with a medium weight paddler, and gradually add weight to the boat
to make the total weight (paddler plus dead weight) equal to around 200
pounds, and see how the boat performed. Obviously I think the boat
would become unstable, and you guys think that the boat would not become
unstable. Since you have never seen a boat become unstable with heavy
loads, you think it can't happen, but it happened to me.

As I said, you guys are not going to listen to me, so I will shut up. ;-)

Richard



Marsh Jones wrote:
Richard Ferguson wrote:

I do not buy your argument at all. If the issue was center of gravity,
the trunk of my body, where most of the weight was, did not move when
I pulled my legs out of the water. Also my legs were on the deck,
just a few inches above the waterline, so the change in center of
gravity was minimal. However, the effect on stability was extremely
dramatic. (I am less than 6 feet tall, so my center of gravity is not
unusually high.) In other words, I can't see how a very small change
in the center of gravity could effect a dramatic change in boat
stability. There has to be another cause.

Nope - with your legs in the water, your CG is definitely lower - and
near the pivot point for the cylinder on which you are sitting. When
you move your feet up into the well, now everything is at or above the
pivot point. A regular kayak keeps a significant amount of your weight
below that pivot point and makes the kayak much more stable. I know
this oversimplifies the math, but that's my .02 and I'm stickin' to it:-)

Remember that this was a sit on top type of kayak, kind of like a
surfboard with depresions for the butt and feet. Most of the kayak
was underwater even before I pulled my legs out of the water. I think
that part of what happened was that the extra weight of my legs put
even more of the kayak under the water, and that affected the hull
design. It started to look more like a submarine than a conventional
boat.

Depending on the particular type of surf ski, many of them are about
like balancing on a bowling ball. Many of the competition skis are
18-19" wide, and take hours of practice to ride successfully, much less
get used to paddling with a wing paddle. The extra height above the
water gives you a lot better leverage once you get used to sitting
balanced on such a skinny boat, and they are darned fast when paddled
right.

Marsh
Minnesota

in article , Richard
Ferguson at wrote on 6/19/04 4:44 PM:

Sounds like you guys have made up your mind that CG is the issue, and
that adding weight to a boat can't possibly make it unstable, and that I
don't know what I am talking about, so I think I am wasting my
breath/typing.


http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/Desi...tyArticle.html


Please read the entire article and understand it before you respond.



Let me make one last try to support my position.

snip

Richard Ferguson wrote:

Sounds like you guys have made up your mind that CG is the issue, and
that adding weight to a boat can't possibly make it unstable, and that I
don't know what I am talking about, so I think I am wasting my
breath/typing.

Richard, if you're sincere in your desire to understand this (and I
believe that you are), you can't allow yourself to get frustrated when
you get answers that you don't understand or don't agree with.

Let me make one last try to support my position.

1. My friend, who is kind of a skinny guy, but is about the same height,
had no problem with the kayak. He is not an expert kayaker. We later
went out offshore into some waves in the Pacific ocean, he in that kayak
and me paddling a windsurfer hull, neither of us had problems, we went
snorkeling, and then climbed back on and paddled back in. This was not
an ultra-narrow high performance narrow sit on top, it was a cheap
recreational type of sit on top, which one would expect to be pretty
stable.

Fine.

2. If the center of gravity is the issue, how come my buddy had no
problem with the boat, and I could not keep it upright for 10 seconds in
flat water, once I lifted my legs out of the water? I am not that bad a
paddler, and since he is the same height, his center of gravity would be
about the same. But maybe you guys think that I am not only incorrect,
but an incompetent paddler. That is probably the only way you can
logically defend your position.

There is no need to get defensive. There is a difference between being
competent and being comfortable in a specific boat. When I first started
paddling, I did so in a fairly wide boat (24" beam). I learned a lot of
skills and felt that I was reasonably competent. When I switched to a
narrower (22") boat with a rounder hull profile, it was like having to
learn all over again. It took months before I was as comfortable in it
as in my wider boat. I now paddle boats that are narrower and
considerably less stable comfortably and that old 22" feels like
paddling a sofa.

It's not a matter of competence. It's a matter of getting used to a
particular boat. If you're used to a wider and/or more stable boat, your
body is used to making relatively coarse movements and large weight
shifts in the course of paddling. Those same movements and weight shifts
in a less stable boat will cause greater movement of the boat, making it
feel unstable. Once you get used to the finer movements necessary in the
less stable boat, it will feel comfortable. It's simply a matter of
adjustment. If you were to paddle a less stable boat for a while then
get back into your old one, it will feel like a barge.

3. He warned me before I tried it that I would probably have trouble
with the boat, that I was too heavy for the boat. He said that his
daughter usually used the boat, and the boat was probably sized more for
her than 200 pound men.

Perhaps so, but if you didn't sink it, that's not what made it feel less
stable. It's probably simply a less stable boat that you're not used to.

The only way to settle this issue scientifically would be to take that
boat with a medium weight paddler, and gradually add weight to the boat
to make the total weight (paddler plus dead weight) equal to around 200
pounds, and see how the boat performed. Obviously I think the boat
would become unstable, and you guys think that the boat would not become
unstable. Since you have never seen a boat become unstable with heavy
loads, you think it can't happen, but it happened to me.

You're simply misinterpreting your experience Richard.

I have loaded my camping boat until it had less than 1" of freeboard
(distance from the gunwale to the water) and it became more stable. I
have 2" or less of freeboard in all of my boats and they're quite
stable. It's a common recommendation for owner of high volume touring
boats to add weight to them to increase stability when they're not
loaded with gear.

How many more examples do you need?

As I said, you guys are not going to listen to me, so I will shut up. ;-)

Open-mindedness goes both ways. If you're not willing to listen to the
answers you receive, why even bother to ask a question? If all you want
is validation of your opinion, you won't find it here, since it's
incorrect. We're trying to help you understand what you experienced. If
anyone should listen, it should be you, don't you think?

You have a choice. You an cling to your belief or you can listen to the
information that's being offered to you. What you do is entirely up to
you. Just remember that you cannot make something true simply by
refusing to believe that it's not.

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:44:50 GMT, Richard Ferguson
posted:

snips

1. My friend, who is kind of a skinny guy, but is about the same height,
had no problem with the kayak.

[...]

2. If the center of gravity is the issue, how come my buddy had no
problem with the boat, and I could not keep it upright for 10 seconds in
flat water, once I lifted my legs out of the water? I am not that bad a
paddler, and since he is the same height, his center of gravity would be
about the same.

According to the responses I've seen, the deduction above has not
been specifically addressed.

The center of gravity of the *paddler* has nothing to do with the
center of gravity of the combined *boat and paddler*. Paddlers of
similar centers of gravity but different mass, upon entering any
boat, will change the center of gravity of the "at rest" boat they
enter in proportion to their mass.

If you stand a five foot high piece of balsa wood in the cockpit of
a kayak, not much is going to happen. But stick a five foot tall
piece of oak, with the same outer dimensions as the balsa piece, in
the boat and the thing will tip over. Both the balsa piece, and the
oak piece, individually, have similar centers of gravity, but when
joined to the boat, their different masses will move the center of
gravity of the boat differently. Two people of similar height, but
different weight, will also differently affect the way a boat heels
and rights (ignoring factors such as whether the boat is inherently
more stable sitting lower in the water or not.)

The above is just a dramatization, and an extreme one, so don't try
it at the lake without adult or female supervision.

Mike Soja

Actually, I did address this, though somewhat briefly. Regardless, this
is a good point.

MikeSoja wrote:

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:44:50 GMT, Richard Ferguson
posted:

snips

1. My friend, who is kind of a skinny guy, but is about the same height,
had no problem with the kayak.


[...]


2. If the center of gravity is the issue, how come my buddy had no
problem with the boat, and I could not keep it upright for 10 seconds in
flat water, once I lifted my legs out of the water? I am not that bad a
paddler, and since he is the same height, his center of gravity would be
about the same.


According to the responses I've seen, the deduction above has not
been specifically addressed.

The center of gravity of the *paddler* has nothing to do with the
center of gravity of the combined *boat and paddler*. Paddlers of
similar centers of gravity but different mass, upon entering any
boat, will change the center of gravity of the "at rest" boat they
enter in proportion to their mass.

If you stand a five foot high piece of balsa wood in the cockpit of
a kayak, not much is going to happen. But stick a five foot tall
piece of oak, with the same outer dimensions as the balsa piece, in
the boat and the thing will tip over. Both the balsa piece, and the
oak piece, individually, have similar centers of gravity, but when
joined to the boat, their different masses will move the center of
gravity of the boat differently. Two people of similar height, but
different weight, will also differently affect the way a boat heels
and rights (ignoring factors such as whether the boat is inherently
more stable sitting lower in the water or not.)

The above is just a dramatization, and an extreme one, so don't try
it at the lake without adult or female supervision.

Mike Soja