![]() |
Costa Concordia wreck
Interesting article on causes of Costa Concordia running on to rocks at Giglio, Italy http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...hit-rocks.html Regards, Brendan |
Costa Concordia wreck
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:07:59 -0000, "Oinkus"
wrote: Interesting article on causes of Costa Concordia running on to rocks at Giglio, Italy http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...hit-rocks.html Regards, Brendan Been seeing it on CNN all day, except when at the gym or being interrupted by the repug gang. |
Costa Concordia wreck
On 1/16/2012 6:32 PM, joevan wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:07:59 -0000, wrote: Interesting article on causes of Costa Concordia running on to rocks at Giglio, Italy http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...hit-rocks.html Regards, Brendan Been seeing it on CNN all day, except when at the gym or being interrupted by the repug gang. Draft 25 feet. Metacenter - 150 feet? It's amazing that these things can float upright at all. |
Costa Concordia wreck
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:42:19 -0600, Richard
wrote: On 1/16/2012 6:32 PM, joevan wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:07:59 -0000, wrote: Interesting article on causes of Costa Concordia running on to rocks at Giglio, Italy http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...hit-rocks.html Regards, Brendan Been seeing it on CNN all day, except when at the gym or being interrupted by the repug gang. Draft 25 feet. Metacenter - 150 feet? It's amazing that these things can float upright at all. Yeah, except for the people hurt and killed it looks better on its side than upright. |
Costa Concordia wreck
IMHO...Beaching her was a mistake.
When a vessel is beached, it loses her stability and rolls over. She should have stayed in deeper water. The water tight doors are closed and would have kept her from sinking. She would have listed and it would have bought time to get the lifeboats over the side. Mark |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com