|
The "O"s...
I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama,
and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... |
The "O"s...
On Nov 10, 7:14 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:19:22 -0800 (PST), wrote: I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... I hope you are right. Bush could go a long way towards improving his sagging popularity if Obama could honestly say he was doing everything he could to ease the transition instead of the "scorched earth" policy we saw with the Clinton staff. The reality is most of this should happen at a fairly low level. The people who's names we never hear are the ones who actually keep the office grinding along. They should get a briefing from the person they replace. Depends on how you define "all". See, we can learn from Democrats. |
The "O"s...
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:19:22 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:
I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../a/2001/05/19/ MN169709.DTL |
The "O"s...
wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. |
The "O"s...
mmc wrote:
wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. I love the "Bush is too good for that" comment. It's just...priceless. Justwaitaloogy is worried about letters on keyboards, but unconcerned about wars initiated under false pretenses, abrogation of the Constitution, torture, Katrina, the failed economy and more. |
The "O"s...
mmc wrote:
wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. |
The "O"s...
On Nov 11, 6:38*pm, BAR wrote:
mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... |
The "O"s...
BAR wrote:
mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. Heheh...oh, the next four to eight are going to be lotsa fun watching the neocon trash trying to con themselves. No one believes the neocon crap anymore, Bertie. |
The "O"s...
|
The "O"s...
On Nov 11, 6:52*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message .... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Of course that is your uninformed and generally dishonest opinion, on both counts. Have you been here all day hoping to hurt someones feelings or get someone to high five you? Sounds like someone needs a shopping trip to Wallmart... |
The "O"s...
|
The "O"s...
|
The "O"s...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. Heheh...oh, the next four to eight are going to be lotsa fun watching the neocon trash trying to con themselves. No one believes the neocon crap anymore, Bertie. I'm not a neocon Harry. You may qualify as a neocon but, I never could. I am a conservative from the first breath I took. |
The "O"s...
"Boater" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. Obama needs to learn a bit of political diplomacy in terms of how he announces and describes some of his incentives. He recently indicated a proposed educational program concept as being "mandatory". Words like that are going to cause him some grief. He's an elected official, not a king. Eisboch |
The "O"s...
"BAR" wrote in message ... Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? Unfortunately, many on the left feel the Constitution is outdated, obsolete and in need of being rewritten to reflect more of the "social welfare" principles they subscribe to. Eisboch |
The "O"s...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. But what else might once expect from someone who believes in Sarah (Call me Rogue) Palin. You didn't answer my question. "Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. When Obama starts to circumvent the Constitution will your direct your acid tongue his way." Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? |
The "O"s...
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. Obama needs to learn a bit of political diplomacy in terms of how he announces and describes some of his incentives. He recently indicated a proposed educational program concept as being "mandatory". Words like that are going to cause him some grief. He's an elected official, not a king. He might try and have Rev. Wright crown him on January 20th. |
The "O"s...
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. But what else might once expect from someone who believes in Sarah (Call me Rogue) Palin. You didn't answer my question. "Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. When Obama starts to circumvent the Constitution will your direct your acid tongue his way." Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? I don't see that happening to any significant degree. OBama will be less abusive of power than the current occupant. |
The "O"s...
Eisboch wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? Unfortunately, many on the left feel the Constitution is outdated, obsolete and in need of being rewritten to reflect more of the "social welfare" principles they subscribe to. There is a way to change the Constitution and identified in Article V. We've done it 17 times in these past 219 years. And, it only took 203 years to get the 27th amendment passed. |
The "O"s...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. But what else might once expect from someone who believes in Sarah (Call me Rogue) Palin. You didn't answer my question. "Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. When Obama starts to circumvent the Constitution will your direct your acid tongue his way." Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? I don't see that happening to any significant degree. OBama will be less abusive of power than the current occupant. Care to make a wager? |
The "O"s...
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 11, 6:38 pm, BAR wrote: mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like I said, see if BushCo tears up and disrespects the office like some spoiled high school brat when they leave office... It speaks to character so Liberals of Harrys stripes don't generally understand... Bush has torn up and disrespects the Constitution, a document I am sure you have never read. Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. After eight years of Bush, *that* is a funny comment. But what else might once expect from someone who believes in Sarah (Call me Rogue) Palin. You didn't answer my question. "Obama thinks the Constitution gets in the way of what he believes needs to be done. When Obama starts to circumvent the Constitution will your direct your acid tongue his way." Will you turn your acid tongue towards Obama when he tries to circumvent the Constitution because it is in the way of what be believes needs to be done? I don't see that happening to any significant degree. OBama will be less abusive of power than the current occupant. Care to make a wager? On what basis? What's your benchmark? The patriot act? The signing statements? The suspension of habeas? |
The "O"s...
"BAR" wrote in message ... mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. After. It's hard to get people to write these "can you believe this sh*t" kinds of books if they agree that driving the airplane into the ground is the best course of action. O'Neill has a strong resume and did great things at ALCOA, but he didn't buy the party line and was told by Cheney to step down "for personal reasons", like all who didn't do/think as told by Bush and Cheney or rather Cheney and Bush. He also advised that naming Paulson as his successor was a mistake which has proved true, especially with the (non) plan for the $700B bailout. No plan and no budget- just gimme this incredible amount of taxpayer dollars. Incredible. |
The "O"s...
mmc wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. After. It's hard to get people to write these "can you believe this sh*t" kinds of books if they agree that driving the airplane into the ground is the best course of action. O'Neill has a strong resume and did great things at ALCOA, but he didn't buy the party line and was told by Cheney to step down "for personal reasons", like all who didn't do/think as told by Bush and Cheney or rather Cheney and Bush. He also advised that naming Paulson as his successor was a mistake which has proved true, especially with the (non) plan for the $700B bailout. No plan and no budget- just gimme this incredible amount of taxpayer dollars. Incredible. And we aren't being told who got the damned money. |
The "O"s...
"Boater" wrote in message ... mmc wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. After. It's hard to get people to write these "can you believe this sh*t" kinds of books if they agree that driving the airplane into the ground is the best course of action. O'Neill has a strong resume and did great things at ALCOA, but he didn't buy the party line and was told by Cheney to step down "for personal reasons", like all who didn't do/think as told by Bush and Cheney or rather Cheney and Bush. He also advised that naming Paulson as his successor was a mistake which has proved true, especially with the (non) plan for the $700B bailout. No plan and no budget- just gimme this incredible amount of taxpayer dollars. Incredible. And we aren't being told who got the damned money. That really is disgusting. No accountability to the very end. I don't think any amount of bailout money will fix all the things that are broken, but if this bailout doesn't at least keep the US from crashing, everyone that signed it should get fired. |
The "O"s...
"mmc" wrote in message g.com... "Boater" wrote in message ... mmc wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... mmc wrote: wrote in message ... I wonder how the transitition will go. I bet Bush really helps Obama, and gives him "all" of the information he will need to take over the country. Not pass bunch of trap door policy and leave out important information about little issues like "AlQueda" and possible threats to the country. The Clinton staff was too busy taking the "W"s off of all the keyboards, stealing furniture, trashing the offices, and setting land mines for the incoming administration. Bush is too good for that, even after listening to the lies of the DNC for the last 8 years... Say what you want, but I bet the Bush staff doesn't spend it's time stealing the "O"s... Read Richard Clarke's book "Against All Enemies". The cabinet, including the National Security Advisor ignored Clarke's numerous warnings about Al Queda. Clarke was a hold over from the Clinton administration and as such, treated with disdain. He was the "Terrorism Czar" and probably knew more on the subject of Al Queda than anyone else in government. The focus was Iraq......7 days in office and the administration was seriously talking about invading and deposing the governemet of Iraq. This comes from "The Price of Loyalty" about former treasury secretary Paul O'Neill. When was Clarke's book written? Was it before or after he was pushed aside by the Bush admin? Clarke appears to be an opportunist. O'Neill is/was a twit. After. It's hard to get people to write these "can you believe this sh*t" kinds of books if they agree that driving the airplane into the ground is the best course of action. O'Neill has a strong resume and did great things at ALCOA, but he didn't buy the party line and was told by Cheney to step down "for personal reasons", like all who didn't do/think as told by Bush and Cheney or rather Cheney and Bush. He also advised that naming Paulson as his successor was a mistake which has proved true, especially with the (non) plan for the $700B bailout. No plan and no budget- just gimme this incredible amount of taxpayer dollars. Incredible. And we aren't being told who got the damned money. That really is disgusting. No accountability to the very end. I don't think any amount of bailout money will fix all the things that are broken, but if this bailout doesn't at least keep the US from crashing, everyone that signed it should get fired. Good write up on printing and injecting lots of money from the government. http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...ike-japan.aspx |
The "O"s...
|
The "O"s...
Good write up on printing and injecting lots of money from the government. http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...ike-japan.aspx These days I dread opening the newspaper or turning on the news.... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com