![]() |
See?
Bush speaks at 8 am.
Stock market is tanking. |
See?
Eisboch wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Gee, I missed that speech. What did he say? |
See?
Eisboch wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-) |
See?
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Gee, I missed that speech. What did he say? "Screw it! I quit! Eisboch |
See?
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Gee, I missed that speech. What did he say? "Screw it! I quit! Eisboch Damn! I missed that! Damn! :) |
See?
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-) I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I sorta understood it). According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes, yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January. Cool, huh? Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. Obama claims that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan. Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. How do you get 95% out of 60%? Is this the *new* math that I missed? Eisboch |
See?
..
-- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:03:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-) I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I sorta understood it). According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes, yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January. Cool, huh? Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. Obama claims that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan. Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. How do you get 95% out of 60%? Is this the *new* math that I missed? Eisboch If you just heard that, you need to listen to that station more often. It'll never make the major media, but the fact has been known for quite a while. Why McCain has not commented on it is beyond me. Maybe he's afraid of hurting the feelings of the 30-40 percent of Americans who pay no taxes. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
..
-- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
John H wrote:
. Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. |
See?
Eisboch wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-) I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I sorta understood it). According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes, yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January. Cool, huh? Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. Obama claims that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan. Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. How do you get 95% out of 60%? Is this the *new* math that I missed? Eisboch Pretty simple 40% pay no taxes that leaves 60% 95% of 60% is 57% 57% will have their taxes reduced. 95% of the remainder will have their taxes cut. That leaves 3%. I'm guessing that that 3% level is Around $200,000 annual income. I think I've heard Barry suggest a number somewhere around that figure. I don't blame Barry for what comes out of his mouth. It's his speech writers that do all the cyphering. And we know all about speech writers, don't we. ;-) |
See?
On Oct 14, 12:08*pm, HK wrote:
John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. .. |
See?
On Oct 14, 10:59*am, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Gee, I missed that speech. What did he say? "Screw it! * I quit! Eisboch Damn! I missed that! Damn! *:)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - .. |
See?
..
-- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
HK wrote:
John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? |
See?
DK wrote:
HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. |
See?
On Oct 14, 11:03*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. Barry will take credit for the blip up yesterday and poor George takes the heat for the backslide. I guess that's fair. :-) I just listened to someone explaining Obama's tax plan in English (so I sorta understood it). According to the source, slightly over 40% of taxpayers will pay *no* taxes, yet a large percentage of that group will get a refund check every January. Cool, huh? Another thing I can't get straightened out in my simple head. * Obama claims that 95% of US citizens will have their taxes reduced according to his plan. Yet, over 40% don't pay taxes at all. * How do you get 95% out of 60%? Is this the *new* math that I missed? Eisboch It's a lie, he changes his tune every time he gets in front of a different audience. |
See?
On Oct 14, 9:50*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
Bush speaks at 8 am. Stock market is tanking. I was doing a bass gig. I missed it. er... what did I miss? |
See?
On Oct 14, 8:53*pm, Boater wrote:
DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. I'd be unable to succeed as a substitute teacher too, if I already had one retirement, and I was at another retirement age. so why not take advantage of retirements? |
See?
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:03:29 -0400, DK
wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Boy, are YOU ever misinformed. (Well I could have said you were a few other things, making an idiotic statement such as that one, but that wouldn't be as nice) |
See?
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater
wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. Doesn't matter. Any lawyer who tried to bring that suit in court would get called worse than that in the dressing down he would get from the judge. It's a complete non-starter. |
See?
|
See?
|
See?
..
-- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
"Boater" wrote in message ... DAn Krueger isn't a lawyer, but he sure tries to get others involved in idiotic lawsuits. You said the magic descriptive words for Ditzy Dan.."idiotic". |
See?
..
-- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
|
See?
|
See?
|
See?
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:17:38 -0400, DK
wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:03:29 -0400, DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Boy, are YOU ever misinformed. (Well I could have said you were a few other things, making an idiotic statement such as that one, but that wouldn't be as nice) Look up internet libel (I won't bother). I'm sure you will find a lot to read and a lot to think about. That was a clear statement of fact about a person, well known to this group, using his full name. It's you who needs to do some homework. It wasn't actionable. |
See?
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:18:19 -0400, DK
wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. Doesn't matter. Any lawyer who tried to bring that suit in court would get called worse than that in the dressing down he would get from the judge. It's a complete non-starter. The wording was too specific. Here's a hint that will serve you well the rest of your life if you take it to heart: If you ever predict a legal point based on common sense, or what you think SHOULD be the result, you will rarely be correct. |
See?
wrote in message ... snip.., you will rarely be correct. That's the story of Ditzy Dans life. |
See?
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:18:19 -0400, DK wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. Doesn't matter. Any lawyer who tried to bring that suit in court would get called worse than that in the dressing down he would get from the judge. It's a complete non-starter. The wording was too specific. Harry is trying hard to get me to talk to him. Unlike some here, I won't discuss anything with him because I don't 'respect' him enough. A word every two or three weeks is plenty. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
See?
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:18:19 -0400, DK wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. Doesn't matter. Any lawyer who tried to bring that suit in court would get called worse than that in the dressing down he would get from the judge. It's a complete non-starter. The wording was too specific. Harry is trying hard to get me to talk to him. Unlike some here, I won't discuss anything with him because I don't 'respect' him enough. A word every two or three weeks is plenty. Wrong, scheisskopf. I don't care whether you live or die. |
See?
On Oct 16, 7:41*am, Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:18:19 -0400, DK wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. |
See?
On Oct 15, 8:25*pm, Boater wrote:
DK wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:03:29 -0400, DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Boy, are YOU ever misinformed. (Well I could have said you were a few other things, making an idiotic statement such as that one, but that wouldn't be as nice) Look up internet libel (I won't bother). *I'm sure you will find a lot to read and a lot to think about. *That was a clear statement of fact about a person, well known to this group, using his full name. You're a flaming ass.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The nasty fat vulgar nail chewing low life calling someone else an ass, that's precious! |
See?
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:18:19 -0400, DK wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. Doesn't matter. Any lawyer who tried to bring that suit in court would get called worse than that in the dressing down he would get from the judge. It's a complete non-starter. The wording was too specific. Harry is trying hard to get me to talk to him. Unlike some here, I won't discuss anything with him because I don't 'respect' him enough. A word every two or three weeks is plenty. Wrong, scheisskopf. I don't care whether you live or die. Dip**** Dottie Krause revealing his compassionate side? |
See?
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:18:19 -0400, DK wrote: wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:53:56 -0400, Boater wrote: DK wrote: HK wrote: John H wrote: . Facts about John Herring: Racist, xenophobic, failure, liar. That's enough for a libel suit. John? Herring's anti-black, anti-Hispanic remarks here are a matter of record, as is his admissions he was unable to succeed as a substitute teacher. ESAD, conservatrash. Doesn't matter. Any lawyer who tried to bring that suit in court would get called worse than that in the dressing down he would get from the judge. It's a complete non-starter. The wording was too specific. Harry is trying hard to get me to talk to him. Unlike some here, I won't discuss anything with him because I don't 'respect' him enough. A word every two or three weeks is plenty. Wrong, scheisskopf. I don't care whether you live or die. Your immediate response to John H belies your true feelings. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com