On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:37:00 -0400, WaIIy wrote:

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:15:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...


Why are you originating new threads and cross posting?

I can understand getting wrapped up in a cross post once in a while,
usually because one neglects to notice the groups in the header.

But, starting a new thread and purposely cross posting it is basically
giving everyone here the finger.

Is *that* what you intended?

Eisboch


As I stated, this is no longer a boating discussion group, so what's wrong
with a little new blood? Are you a snob? :)


So, *you* see nothing wrong with initiating a crossposted thread because it
serves *your* interests?

Why does that not surprise me?

Eisboch



If you take in a snake and you get bitten, that's what they do.

Now *that's* the best comment of the day!

On Sep 7, 4:55*pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

Why are you originating new threads and cross posting?

I can understand getting wrapped up in a cross post once in a while, usually
because one neglects to notice the groups in the header.

But, starting a new thread and purposely cross posting it is basically
giving everyone here the finger.

Is *that* what you intended?

Eisboch

As I stated, this is no longer a boating discussion group, so what's
wrong with a little new blood? Are you a snob? *:)

Well, the title does still say "rec.boats" and not "political.
hack.finger"

Sure it's a boating group, as long as people talk boating

And that can still be arranged..

Tim wrote:
On Sep 7, 4:55 pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Why are you originating new threads and cross posting?
I can understand getting wrapped up in a cross post once in a while, usually
because one neglects to notice the groups in the header.
But, starting a new thread and purposely cross posting it is basically
giving everyone here the finger.
Is *that* what you intended?
Eisboch
As I stated, this is no longer a boating discussion group, so what's
wrong with a little new blood? Are you a snob? :)

Well, the title does still say "rec.boats" and not "political.
hack.finger"

Sure it's a boating group, as long as people talk boating

And that can still be arranged..


what the title sez and what is discussed here are not the same.

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...


Why are you originating new threads and cross posting?

I can understand getting wrapped up in a cross post once in a while,
usually because one neglects to notice the groups in the header.

But, starting a new thread and purposely cross posting it is basically
giving everyone here the finger.

Is *that* what you intended?

Eisboch



As I stated, this is no longer a boating discussion group, so what's
wrong with a little new blood? Are you a snob? :)

Really having a bad day Harry? How was the boating? Or did the planning
fall through?

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...


Why are you originating new threads and cross posting?

I can understand getting wrapped up in a cross post once in a while, usually
because one neglects to notice the groups in the header.

But, starting a new thread and purposely cross posting it is basically
giving everyone here the finger.

Is *that* what you intended?

Eisboch




Got any nice detailed photos of your new boat you can post?

"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Got any nice detailed photos of your new boat you can post?

Yup. I can .... but I won't.

Let's talk about boats.

What do you think about secondary control stations located in the cockpit
area?
Do you find them useful, Harry?

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Got any nice detailed photos of your new boat you can post?

Yup. I can .... but I won't.

Let's talk about boats.

What do you think about secondary control stations located in the cockpit
area?
Do you find them useful, Harry?

Eisboch




I found the cockpit control station very useful on my 25' Parker when
docking and considerably less useful but still usable when underway
ahead. I can say a lot more about that subject and how they work on
different boats, but...I won't.

"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Got any nice detailed photos of your new boat you can post?

Yup. I can .... but I won't.

Let's talk about boats.

What do you think about secondary control stations located in the cockpit
area?
Do you find them useful, Harry?

Eisboch


I found the cockpit control station very useful on my 25' Parker when
docking and considerably less useful but still usable when underway ahead.
I can say a lot more about that subject and how they work on different
boats, but...I won't.


It *is* on topic. Fire away.

Eisboch

WaIIy wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:35:09 -0400, hk wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Got any nice detailed photos of your new boat you can post?
Yup. I can .... but I won't.

Let's talk about boats.

What do you think about secondary control stations located in the cockpit
area?
Do you find them useful, Harry?

Eisboch



I found the cockpit control station very useful on my 25' Parker when
docking and considerably less useful but still usable when underway
ahead. I can say a lot more about that subject and how they work on
different boats,


but...I can't because I don't have a clue.



Classy as always, d.f.

Plan to post detailed photos of that boat of yours?

I didn't think so.

On Sep 7, 5:26*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message

. ..



Got any nice detailed photos of your new boat you can post?

Yup. * I can .... but I won't.

Let's talk about boats.

What do you think about secondary control stations located in the cockpit
area?
Do you find them useful, Harry?

Eisboch

I've never had a boat with a secondary control station. But I suppose
that's ok, too.