To be fair, her constituency was different. If the Feds want to give out
the pork, as a mayor or a governor, you would be a fool not to take it.
However, she could be a little more honest about it. Eventually, she may
have said no to the "bridge to nowhere" but she didn't say no to the
money.
So, she was *for* earmarks until she decided it would be better to say
she was against them? :)
For them, but now against them
Threaded Mode
