|
Anyone hear McCain...
....responding to a woman who said she thought the draft would have to be
re-instated in order to get bin Laden... ....say... ....he agreed with what she said...? McCain on the record...wants to reinstate the draft. One has to wonder just how many wars McCain wants to start. John "I'll pander to anyone to get elected" McCain. |
Anyone hear McCain...
"hk" wrote in message . .. ...responding to a woman who said she thought the draft would have to be re-instated in order to get bin Laden... ...say... ...he agreed with what she said...? McCain on the record...wants to reinstate the draft. One has to wonder just how many wars McCain wants to start. John "I'll pander to anyone to get elected" McCain. That is a reach, even for a DNC shill. |
Anyone hear McCain...
Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. ...responding to a woman who said she thought the draft would have to be re-instated in order to get bin Laden... ...say... ...he agreed with what she said...? McCain on the record...wants to reinstate the draft. One has to wonder just how many wars McCain wants to start. John "I'll pander to anyone to get elected" McCain. That is a reach, even for a DNC shill. The video has been on tv news all evening. I think it's great. McCain and I both support the draft, but for entirely different reasons. |
Anyone hear McCain...
|
Anyone hear McCain...
Calif Bill wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. ...responding to a woman who said she thought the draft would have to be re-instated in order to get bin Laden... ...say... ...he agreed with what she said...? McCain on the record...wants to reinstate the draft. One has to wonder just how many wars McCain wants to start. John "I'll pander to anyone to get elected" McCain. That is a reach, even for a DNC shill. Sorry, Bilious...the tape has been on TV all evening. |
Anyone hear McCain...
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Aug 20, 10:43*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch Exactly. Here is another discussion of the issue: http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/...draft_nope.php |
Anyone hear McCain...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch What difference does that make? McCain's said all many of conflicting things about the draft in recent years. He was for it before he was against it before he was for it. |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Aug 20, 10:56*pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch What difference does that make? McCain's said all many of conflicting things about the draft in recent years. He was for it before he was against it before he was for it. Nice spin. |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Aug 20, 8:45*pm, hk wrote:
...responding to a woman who said she thought the draft would have to be re-instated in order to get bin Laden... ...say... ...he agreed with what she said...? McCain on the record...wants to reinstate the draft. One has to wonder just how many wars McCain wants to start. John "I'll pander to anyone to get elected" McCain. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3msRsdt6bWY Really? |
Anyone hear McCain...
I didn't watch any of it this evening. I had more important things to
do. I had a gig with my band |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Aug 20, 10:05 pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 20, 8:45 pm, hk wrote: ...responding to a woman who said she thought the draft would have to be re-instated in order to get bin Laden... ...say... ...he agreed with what she said...? McCain on the record...wants to reinstate the draft. One has to wonder just how many wars McCain wants to start. John "I'll pander to anyone to get elected" McCain. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3msRsdt6bWY Really? is the kind lady making a speech? or asking a question? |
Anyone hear McCain...
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch What difference does that make? McCain's said all many of conflicting things about the draft in recent years. He was for it before he was against it before he was for it. What difference does it make? A big difference to those that are actually listening and not simply repeating the left wing spin. I saw this a week or more ago, thought about posting it for your benefit, then said, "The heck with it, Harry will cut and paste it soon anyway". Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch What difference does that make? McCain's said all many of conflicting things about the draft in recent years. He was for it before he was against it before he was for it. What difference does it make? A big difference to those that are actually listening and not simply repeating the left wing spin. I saw this a week or more ago, thought about posting it for your benefit, then said, "The heck with it, Harry will cut and paste it soon anyway". Eisboch Mistake. I was confusing two threads. The one I saw a week or so ago was the article about McCain's first wife and the divorce of 28 years ago. Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
JimH wrote:
On Aug 20, 10:56 pm, hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Hopefully, the Dems will make a nice TV commercial out of McCain's statement. If they do, that may well be the end of McCain. If they do, I hope they include the long-winded, rambling, hard to follow speech of a question that the woman asked. All he said, when she finally shut up, was "I don't disagree with you". The whole thing is stupid. Eisboch What difference does that make? McCain's said all many of conflicting things about the draft in recent years. He was for it before he was against it before he was for it. Nice spin. Over the last few years, McCain has been for the draft, against the draft, for the draft, and against the draft. McCain flips and flops more than the egg turner at Waffle House. Some of this may be because he simply has changed his mind, which is reasonable, and some of it may be because he simply cannot remember from one day to the next what the position du jour is. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. We don't need to elect a president cast in the mold of GWB, a man like McCain who will turn out to be an incompetent leader, a president with terrible judgment who makes lousy decisions. If the country hasn't been in a coma the last eight years, it will not elect John McBush, er, McSame, er, McCain. |
Anyone hear McCain...
"hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. |
Anyone hear McCain...
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. There's a couple I might consider voting for. Meanwhile, your buddy Obama is making a huge mistake, I think. Back from vacation, he's running around promising millions of new, union jobs. He must have forgotten that union jobs make up a very small minority of employment in the US and most non-union workers and employers want absolutely nothing to do with them. He isn't going to garner many votes with this approach. Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:40:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
I didn't watch any of it this evening. I had more important things to do. I had a gig with my band My neither. I also had more important things to do. Had to fry up some green tomatoes. |
Anyone hear McCain...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. There's a couple I might consider voting for. Meanwhile, your buddy Obama is making a huge mistake, I think. Back from vacation, he's running around promising millions of new, union jobs. He must have forgotten that union jobs make up a very small minority of employment in the US and most non-union workers and employers want absolutely nothing to do with them. He isn't going to garner many votes with this approach. Eisboch Yes, indeed...the exploited lower middle income workers in this country know that Job One is to work for less and with fewer if any bennies so their corporate masters and stockholders can get richer, while they slide into oblivion. I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. |
Anyone hear McCain...
hk wrote:
.. I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? |
Anyone hear McCain...
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. There's a couple I might consider voting for. Meanwhile, your buddy Obama is making a huge mistake, I think. Back from vacation, he's running around promising millions of new, union jobs. He must have forgotten that union jobs make up a very small minority of employment in the US and most non-union workers and employers want absolutely nothing to do with them. He isn't going to garner many votes with this approach. Eisboch Yes, indeed...the exploited lower middle income workers in this country know that Job One is to work for less and with fewer if any bennies so their corporate masters and stockholders can get richer, while they slide into oblivion. I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. That's not the group that Obama is alienating. The majority of jobs in the US is in small, private companies. For the most part, a "big" corporate culture doesn't exist and the owners are typically the major (or only) stockholder. These companies have a relationship with the employees quite different than that you complain about and typically have no interest in unions, employees or employer. This workforce is the group that Obama will not appeal to with his promises, and they represent the majority of voters. Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:04:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
This workforce is the group that Obama will not appeal to with his promises, and they represent the majority of voters. I still think this whole discussion is mute. I think the PUMA faction is going to take the nomination away from BarryO and give it to Hillary. Just a hunch - nothing to back it up, but reading about BarryO's capitulation to the PUMA faction, the fact that Clinton will have her own floor whips at the convention, the rally, the absolutely vicious email the PUMA faction sent around (and probably more racist than anything I've seen in the past few years) and that a full 30% of the PUMA faction saying they will not vote for BarryO under any circumstances and some noted Democrats awkwardly avoiding BarryO like the Plague - it's very possible. The later is key - the Democrats in this state avoided Ned Lamont like the Plague too - and look what happened to him. Add that the Clintons aren't being very visible or open about endorsing BarryO, the new questions about his heritage (as in registering at a Indonesian Catholic School as a Muslim), the fact that the Arab world will view him as an apostate, heretic and unclean making his job harder to deal with them (which is gaining some momentum among the smarter Democrats). You know what's even funnier about all this? All this stuff I've just talked about has come from Democratic sources, blogs, comments and one forum I read fairly regularly - none of which are exactly ...um... moderately leftist in nature. :) It might be actually worth watching. |
Anyone hear McCain...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:04:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: This workforce is the group that Obama will not appeal to with his promises, and they represent the majority of voters. I still think this whole discussion is mute. I think the PUMA faction is going to take the nomination away from BarryO and give it to Hillary. Just a hunch - nothing to back it up, but reading about BarryO's capitulation to the PUMA faction, the fact that Clinton will have her own floor whips at the convention, the rally, the absolutely vicious email the PUMA faction sent around (and probably more racist than anything I've seen in the past few years) and that a full 30% of the PUMA faction saying they will not vote for BarryO under any circumstances and some noted Democrats awkwardly avoiding BarryO like the Plague - it's very possible. The later is key - the Democrats in this state avoided Ned Lamont like the Plague too - and look what happened to him. Add that the Clintons aren't being very visible or open about endorsing BarryO, the new questions about his heritage (as in registering at a Indonesian Catholic School as a Muslim), the fact that the Arab world will view him as an apostate, heretic and unclean making his job harder to deal with them (which is gaining some momentum among the smarter Democrats). You know what's even funnier about all this? All this stuff I've just talked about has come from Democratic sources, blogs, comments and one forum I read fairly regularly - none of which are exactly ...um... moderately leftist in nature. :) It might be actually worth watching. You are scaring me. If this happens (and I also think it's a possibility) the whole US election system is going to be turned upside down and may never be the same again. Any remaining faith in the integrity of the process is going to go out the window, forever. We will have the Clintons to thank for this. Plus, I'll never be able to discuss politics with Mrs.E. again ........ Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
|
Anyone hear McCain...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:54:09 +0000, Richard Casady wrote:
The draft gave the entire society a stake in the military, and in avoiding military adventurism. Rich mens sons served in Viet Nam. Casady Personally, I keep thinking we are asking too much of too few. These soldiers are going into a war zone four and five tours. That just isn't right in my book. As a country, if we are going to war, we should do it as a country meaning everyone should roll the dice. |
Anyone hear McCain...
wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:54:09 +0000, Richard Casady wrote: The draft gave the entire society a stake in the military, and in avoiding military adventurism. Rich mens sons served in Viet Nam. Casady Personally, I keep thinking we are asking too much of too few. These soldiers are going into a war zone four and five tours. That just isn't right in my book. As a country, if we are going to war, we should do it as a country meaning everyone should roll the dice. I think those serving might disagree with you, although your general justification has merit. The volunteer military is a much more professional, dedicated and capable organization than that of the draft period which I was a member of. Eisboch |
Anyone hear McCain...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. There's a couple I might consider voting for. Meanwhile, your buddy Obama is making a huge mistake, I think. Back from vacation, he's running around promising millions of new, union jobs. He must have forgotten that union jobs make up a very small minority of employment in the US and most non-union workers and employers want absolutely nothing to do with them. He isn't going to garner many votes with this approach. Eisboch Yes, indeed...the exploited lower middle income workers in this country know that Job One is to work for less and with fewer if any bennies so their corporate masters and stockholders can get richer, while they slide into oblivion. I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. That's not the group that Obama is alienating. The majority of jobs in the US is in small, private companies. For the most part, a "big" corporate culture doesn't exist and the owners are typically the major (or only) stockholder. These companies have a relationship with the employees quite different than that you complain about and typically have no interest in unions, employees or employer. This workforce is the group that Obama will not appeal to with his promises, and they represent the majority of voters. Eisboch I would have thought Obama would walk away with the election. It looks like he is falling off a cliff, which is why Harry is going crazy with these cut and paste article. If he really wanted to make a difference, he would spend time doing something productive to help, instead of spending all his time in rec.boats. |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of
Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady |
Anyone hear McCain...
|
Anyone hear McCain...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:10:33 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall,
Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. There's a couple I might consider voting for. Meanwhile, your buddy Obama is making a huge mistake, I think. Back from vacation, he's running around promising millions of new, union jobs. He must have forgotten that union jobs make up a very small minority of employment in the US and most non-union workers and employers want absolutely nothing to do with them. He isn't going to garner many votes with this approach. Eisboch Yes, indeed...the exploited lower middle income workers in this country know that Job One is to work for less and with fewer if any bennies so their corporate masters and stockholders can get richer, while they slide into oblivion. I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. That's not the group that Obama is alienating. The majority of jobs in the US is in small, private companies. For the most part, a "big" corporate culture doesn't exist and the owners are typically the major (or only) stockholder. These companies have a relationship with the employees quite different than that you complain about and typically have no interest in unions, employees or employer. This workforce is the group that Obama will not appeal to with his promises, and they represent the majority of voters. Eisboch I would have thought Obama would walk away with the election. It looks like he is falling off a cliff, which is why Harry is going crazy with these cut and paste article. If he really wanted to make a difference, he would spend time doing something productive to help, instead of spending all his time in rec.boats. Actually, if Harry took up golf he would be helping Obama. The more he posts here, the more he turns people away from his political stance. If most liberals are like him, and many are, who would want to become one? Five hours with Harry on the golf course, away from a computer, would probably bring Obama's poll numbers way up. |
Anyone hear McCain...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:10:33 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. He's old, he's tired, he's repetitive, and he is way, way past his prime. So are a couple of people here in rec.boats. :-) Eisboch The old f*rts here ain't runnin' for POTUS. There's a couple I might consider voting for. Meanwhile, your buddy Obama is making a huge mistake, I think. Back from vacation, he's running around promising millions of new, union jobs. He must have forgotten that union jobs make up a very small minority of employment in the US and most non-union workers and employers want absolutely nothing to do with them. He isn't going to garner many votes with this approach. Eisboch Yes, indeed...the exploited lower middle income workers in this country know that Job One is to work for less and with fewer if any bennies so their corporate masters and stockholders can get richer, while they slide into oblivion. I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. That's not the group that Obama is alienating. The majority of jobs in the US is in small, private companies. For the most part, a "big" corporate culture doesn't exist and the owners are typically the major (or only) stockholder. These companies have a relationship with the employees quite different than that you complain about and typically have no interest in unions, employees or employer. This workforce is the group that Obama will not appeal to with his promises, and they represent the majority of voters. Eisboch I would have thought Obama would walk away with the election. It looks like he is falling off a cliff, which is why Harry is going crazy with these cut and paste article. If he really wanted to make a difference, he would spend time doing something productive to help, instead of spending all his time in rec.boats. Actually, if Harry took up golf he would be helping Obama. The more he posts here, the more he turns people away from his political stance. If most liberals are like him, and many are, who would want to become one? Five hours with Harry on the golf course, away from a computer, would probably bring Obama's poll numbers way up. Harry is his own worse enemy. That might be why he is always so upset in rec.boats. |
Anyone hear McCain...
Richard Casady wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:05:43 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Plus, I'll never be able to discuss politics with Mrs.E. again ........ If Mrs. E is anything like Mrs. Wave, that might be a good thing. :) |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Aug 21, 12:13*pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? *Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground *to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. * I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. Do you ever make a post without mentioning Harry? |
Anyone hear McCain...
JimH wrote:
On Aug 21, 12:13 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. Do you ever make a post without mentioning Harry? It's just more reggiecrap. Reggie is the slightly more literate older brother of Loogie. Same genetics. Both are on my ignore list. |
Anyone hear McCain...
JimH wrote:
On Aug 21, 12:13 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. Do you ever make a post without mentioning Harry? I didn't bring Harry into this post. Harry said he was looking forward to the time when the people revolt and stick the powerful head on a pike. It reminded me of Vlad the Impaler, who would impale his enemies with a pike. When someone mentioned the procedure they used, I didn't want to give Harry any ideas. Now, what do you think of someone who is "I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes." I find it sick, don't you? |
Anyone hear McCain...
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote: JimH wrote: On Aug 21, 12:13 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. Do you ever make a post without mentioning Harry? I didn't bring Harry into this post. Harry said he was looking forward to the time when the people revolt and stick the powerful head on a pike. It reminded me of Vlad the Impaler, who would impale his enemies with a pike. When someone mentioned the procedure they used, I didn't want to give Harry any ideas. Now, what do you think of someone who SAID "I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes." I find it sick, don't you? |
Anyone hear McCain...
On Aug 21, 6:18*pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: JimH wrote: On Aug 21, 12:13 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? *Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground *to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. * I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. Do you ever make a post without mentioning Harry? I didn't bring Harry into this post. *Harry said he was looking forward to the time when the people revolt and stick the powerful head on a pike. *It reminded me of Vlad the Impaler, who would impale his enemies with a pike. *When someone mentioned the procedure they used, I didn't want to give Harry any ideas. Now, what do you think of someone who is "I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes." I find it sick, don't you? I rest my case. |
Anyone hear McCain...
JimH wrote:
On Aug 21, 6:18 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: JimH wrote: On Aug 21, 12:13 pm, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:58:45 -0400, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: . I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes. Vlad? Is that you? The head is not where Vlad put the pike, and the victims were alive at the time. Not really a pike in his case, the proper stake is as high as the navel, greased, and tapers from four inches at the ground to a rounded point like half a golf ball. There is a reason that the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. Casady Damn you, why did you have to give Harry any more ideas. I am glad Harry will never have any power, he could be very dangerous. Do you ever make a post without mentioning Harry? I didn't bring Harry into this post. Harry said he was looking forward to the time when the people revolt and stick the powerful head on a pike. It reminded me of Vlad the Impaler, who would impale his enemies with a pike. When someone mentioned the procedure they used, I didn't want to give Harry any ideas. Now, what do you think of someone who is "I do so wish I were younger sometimes, so that when the exploited finally realize they've been getting screwed for generations, I could see some of the heads they put on pikes." I find it sick, don't you? I rest my case. I guess you didn't find anything strange about the comment, so you didn't respond. I thought it was sick, you didn't. I rest my case. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com