| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:42:13 -0400, hk wrote:
Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:53:05 -0400, hk wrote: I was discussing the vulnerability of carriers. They are sitting ducks for ballistic missiles. Not really. A ballistic missile, by definition, can do little or nothing to alter course after the launch phase. That's why they are called "ballistic". An aircraft carrier on the other hand is constantly on the move. Where it is at launch time is not where it is going to be 15 or 20 minutes later when the missile arrives. Your knowledge base it out of date. There are ballistic missiles capable of "course corrections," and there are very very fast "cruise" missiles being developed that achieve super high speeds that can be guided. A cruise missile and a ballistic missile are two entirely different things. Cruise missiles are defended by traditional radar and interceprion technologies - not perfect but quite good. The ability to make precision mid-course corrections by a ballistic missile is very, very limited. Claiming expertise in hi-tech weapons after reading a couple of Wikipedia articles is a bit of a stretch don't you think? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Go Navy! | Cruising | |||
| Go Navy! | ASA | |||
| In the Navy... | General | |||
| Go Navy | ASA | |||
| The New Navy = $$$ | General | |||