More problems for the Navy...
 

RMR wrote:
We do have one poster here who uses a spoofer, he showed us a picture
of it on his monitor.. and he spells the same way too.. My bets are
on....

One who has been a lot more careful since Gene's server came on line,
one who craves attention, was very curious about Genes filters...

Hummmm....



Keep your day job...

Whoops...you don't have one.

You and W'ine ought to get together and form a new company:

The Clueless Dicks.

More problems for the Navy...
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:39:39 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

I don't think we have anyone else from Halifax.
Are you sure about your accusation?

Only to the extent that the post was definitely from Halifax. Of that
there is no doubt.

Here is a post this evening from "rec.boats.cruising":

======
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nl pi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!news feed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps83. POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Message-ID:
From: Bullschitter
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats.cruising
Subject: Thinking
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 3
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:35:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.66.79
X-Trace: edtnps83 1218749727 24.222.66.79 (Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:35:27
MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:35:27 MDT
Bytes: 864
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats.cruising:318022

[Thinking] about bringing a Person 32 back from Bermuda to Halifax in
mid September. Good idea or bad given the forcasts?
======

Pearson 32s are sailboats. Don is a sailor.

Unless Don has an evil twin who is also from Halifax, and also sails,
my money is still on him.





Fools and their money...

The reality is, as it is with most things, you haven't a clue.

Look to one of the Seven Schitts around here who don't like Don and who
have a habit of using multiple IDs.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:51:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Aug 14, 8:55 pm, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing



wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

Correctly.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

So be iit.

SWS/Tom now posts here and other places under a dozen or so handles
as do Reggie, JohnH, Loogy, FLA Jim and Scotty. Even a scorecard will
not help you.

Pointing fingers to the wrong person? Eh?

Someone here stated that Dan was the culpri with the wife post. If
so.......I am disappointed. However......until Don chimes in I do not
accept the accusation.

The bottom line.............can folks her finally start to act like
the adults they are?

I can't speak for 'Dan', but Don is totally innocent of posting under any
handle other than Don White.


You tell him, Don. Hell, none of this would have happened had he read the
damn post in the first place.

As none of the people to which he is referring care to talk with him, his
bull**** accusations are meaningless anyway. I'd like to see the dozen or
so handles I've used.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch

Why is that?

More problems for the Navy...
 

Don is not Bullschitter.

Don White wrote:

"hk" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

The point is you accuse someone that doesn't deserve it.
So who is it?
Don White

C:\Windows\System32tracert 24.222.66.79

Tracing route to blk-222-66-79.eastlink.ca [24.222.66.79]

Eastlink.ca is headquartered in Halifax, Nova Scotia

http://www.eastlink.ca/about/

QED

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q.E.D.


Sorry Slick..... I don't subscribe to Eastlink for my internet service.
Try again.




Wayne should join forces with our other internet genius, JustWait.

As long as you keep 'em on your side of the border.

More problems for the Navy...
 

wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch

Why is that?


While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis, much
like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?


While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis, much
like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch



What changes were these?

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?


While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis, much
like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch



Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination
for decades.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 2:40*pm, hk wrote:


Yeah, and to this day, the attacks on the Stark have not been fully
explained.



I'm sure Larry could explaine it, though. Of course, it was all backed
by Masonic Jewish bankers that have ties with the Illuminatti,
but........

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Aug 14, 2:40*pm, hk wrote:


Yeah, and to this day, the attacks on the Stark have not been fully
explained.



I'm sure Larry could explaine it, though. Of course, it was all backed
by Masonic Jewish bankers that have ties with the Illuminatti,
but........

Please, Tim, don't get Larry started!

Go study the brain diagram instead.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

More problems for the Navy...
 

Tim wrote:
On Aug 14, 2:40 pm, hk wrote:

Yeah, and to this day, the attacks on the Stark have not been fully
explained.



I'm sure Larry could explaine it, though. Of course, it was all backed
by Masonic Jewish bankers that have ties with the Illuminatti,
but........


I don't mean "that" explanation. We know what happened.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?


While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis,
much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch

Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination for
decades.

Surely, I am not.

I am referring to policies that began to erode traditional chain of command
structures.
But, never mind. You and I would never agree on this type of subject.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 15, 6:51*am, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Aug 14, 2:40 pm, hk wrote:

Yeah, and to this day, the attacks on the Stark have not been fully
explained.

I'm sure Larry could explaine it, though. Of course, it was all backed
by Masonic Jewish bankers that have ties with the Illuminatti,
but........

I don't mean "that" explanation. We know what happened.

?: )

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?

While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis,
much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch
Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination for
decades.

Surely, I am not.

I am referring to policies that began to erode traditional chain of command
structures.
But, never mind. You and I would never agree on this type of subject.

Eisboch



Eisboch,
Congratulations. I was wondering when you would realize this. ;)

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?

While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis,
much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch
Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination for
decades.

Surely, I am not.

I am referring to policies that began to erode traditional chain of command
structures.
But, never mind. You and I would never agree on this type of subject.

Eisboch




Whatever Zumwalt did, it had less of a negative effect on the military
than the policies of Bush, Cheney, and that idiot secretary of defense
who stepped down.

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?

While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis,
much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch
Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination for
decades.

Surely, I am not.

I am referring to policies that began to erode traditional chain of command
structures.
But, never mind. You and I would never agree on this type of subject.

Eisboch




You never know. What policies?

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:41:18 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force. He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular
basis, much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch

Disregarding his Z-Grams, his ideas about many, cheaper ships, as opposed
to fewer, expensive ships, makes sense to me. In WWII, many/most of the
German weapons systems were superior to ours, but in a war, numbers
matter, and we produced the numbers. We seem to have become enthralled
with technology, and I'm not sure it's the right direction. The Zumwalt
destroyer seems to be a good example.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
.com...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?

While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis,
much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch
Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination
for decades.

Surely, I am not.

I am referring to policies that began to erode traditional chain of
command structures.
But, never mind. You and I would never agree on this type of subject.

Eisboch


You never know. What policies?

I should correct myself. Not all were bad.
He relaxed many traditional regulations however that were taken advantage of
by many, causing discipline and moral problems.
Certainly not intended to do so, the relaxation of some regulations led to a
sharp increase of drug use and abuse for example.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:18:06 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


I should correct myself. Not all were bad. He relaxed many traditional
regulations however that were taken advantage of by many, causing
discipline and moral problems. Certainly not intended to do so, the
relaxation of some regulations led to a sharp increase of drug use and
abuse for example.

Eisboch

That might have been a symptom of the times. After Vietnam, morale
wasn't at it's highest, either.

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
.com...
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch
Why is that?
While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military
force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis,
much like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

Eisboch
Surely you are not referring to his policies to reduce discrimination
against women and minorities? The navy was a hotbed of discrimination
for decades.
Surely, I am not.

I am referring to policies that began to erode traditional chain of
command structures.
But, never mind. You and I would never agree on this type of subject.

Eisboch

You never know. What policies?

I should correct myself. Not all were bad.
He relaxed many traditional regulations however that were taken advantage of
by many, causing discipline and moral problems.
Certainly not intended to do so, the relaxation of some regulations led to a
sharp increase of drug use and abuse for example.

Eisboch




Well, now, I'm sure we'd agree that any policy adopted by the military
that led to an increased use of illegal drugs would be a bad one. While
I believe possession of personal amounts of marijuana should be
completely decriminalized for the general population, I don't believe
such relaxation should extend to the military.

So, so far you are incorrect on whether we would agree.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"Bullschitter" wrote in message
...
Don is not Bullschitter.




Thank you!

More problems for the Navy...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:42:26 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:51:05 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

I can't speak for 'Dan', but Don is totally innocent of posting under
any
handle other than Don White.

It's coming from googlegroups via an aggregator via a blogger site
called thecaptainandthekid.

It may have been routed thorugh a Halifax server, but I doubt it
originated there.

As least that's the way I read it.

Ah ha! Someone may be getting creative in this group.
Good thing they weren't smart enough to use my provider. I'd be here for
months protesting my innocence.

I've contacted Easynews to trace it out for me - I have "connections"
there.

Get it - "connections"?

Got it ;-)

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..



Well, now, I'm sure we'd agree that any policy adopted by the military
that led to an increased use of illegal drugs would be a bad one. While I
believe possession of personal amounts of marijuana should be completely
decriminalized for the general population, I don't believe such relaxation
should extend to the military.

So, so far you are incorrect on whether we would agree.


Sure 'nuff. Gotta keep an open mind. The breeze clears out the cobwebs
as well.

BTW .... I understand your reluctance to embrace the PRC and, to that I also
agree. However, I think it is wise to pay attention to what is going on
over there. Like it or not, China is going to have a major influence on all
of our lives in the future.

I also think the seeds have been planted over there for serious political
and social reforms in the future. We are witnessing the early birth of a
potential revolution leading to Democracy. The Chinese people have been
kept in the dark for centuries ... even predating Mao and communism, but
once the light is turned on, people gain some prosperity and knowledge, it
is increasingly difficult to turn the light back off.

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:42:15 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Bullschitter" wrote in message
...
Don is not Bullschitter.




Thank you!


Don, are you writing to yourself again?

:)
--
** Good Day! **

John H

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Well, now, I'm sure we'd agree that any policy adopted by the military
that led to an increased use of illegal drugs would be a bad one. While I
believe possession of personal amounts of marijuana should be completely
decriminalized for the general population, I don't believe such relaxation
should extend to the military.

So, so far you are incorrect on whether we would agree.


Sure 'nuff. Gotta keep an open mind. The breeze clears out the cobwebs
as well.

BTW .... I understand your reluctance to embrace the PRC and, to that I also
agree. However, I think it is wise to pay attention to what is going on
over there. Like it or not, China is going to have a major influence on all
of our lives in the future.

I also think the seeds have been planted over there for serious political
and social reforms in the future. We are witnessing the early birth of a
potential revolution leading to Democracy. The Chinese people have been
kept in the dark for centuries ... even predating Mao and communism, but
once the light is turned on, people gain some prosperity and knowledge, it
is increasingly difficult to turn the light back off.

Eisboch




I do pay attention - close attention - to what happens in the PRC, and
have done so since the Nixon Administration. I won't dispute the
influence China is having and will have on world affairs.

Actually, China, Russia, and the United States are all heading in the
same direction, towards a repressive society operated only for the
benefit of the very few very rich.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 9:14*pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 8:55*pm, John H. wrote:





On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:51:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing

wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:09:37 GMT, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:07:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

On Aug 14, 6:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter
wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. *No need for a Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Definitely got your handle right.
--
** Good Day! **

* * * * * John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Um...excuse me?

Pay no attention. Something confused Jimh.

Ah - JimH pointing fingers again I assume.

Correctly.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

So be iit.

SWS/Tom now *posts here and other places under a dozen or so handles
as do Reggie, JohnH, Loogy, FLA Jim and Scotty. *Even a scorecard will
not help you.

Pointing fingers to the wrong person? *Eh?

Someone here stated that Dan was the culpri with the wife post. *If
so.......I am disappointed. *However......until Don chimes in I do not
accept the accusation.

The bottom line.............can folks her finally start to act like
the adults they are?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I post under one handle, you liar. You're getting so you lie almost as
much as Harry, warp17.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"hk" wrote in message
. ..


Actually, China, Russia, and the United States are all heading in the same
direction, towards a repressive society operated only for the benefit of
the very few very rich.


Are you and Larry related?

Eisboch

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 8:28*pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 8:23*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:





"JimH" wrote in message

....
On Aug 14, 8:14 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message

....
On Aug 14, 8:05 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 14, 7:27 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Aug 14, 6:29 pm, Bullschitter wrote:

and you know this for a fact. Why are you bringing Tom's into a
ducission.
your a
Putz.

JimH wrote:
On Aug 14, 6:09 pm, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:51 GMT, Bullschitter

wrote:

Take the air, then bomb the schit otta the Oceans. No need for
a
Navy, lost
it's edge after WW11.

Why b Definitely got your handle right.

--
** Good Day! **

John H

Tom's wife is a bull****ter?

Just repeating what John called you (Tom).

=========================================

Try reading the header.

With all the folks here using multiple handles lately..........why
bother?

BTW: Who's wife is a bull****ter?
===================================

The point is you accuse someone that doesn't deserve it.

So who is it?
========================

It ain't SWS.

So who is it?

I don't care to do anymore research other than it's obvious who it isn't.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Aug 14, 8:03*pm, hk wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT), JimH
wrote:

Your barge would hold a lot more explosives, and make a much more colorful
boom. Especially if you were on it.
Wow... talk about a **** storm!
Actually I found Harry's post offensive.

Thank you, I agree.

Good. It was intended to be as offensive to you as you typically are to
me. Tit for tat. Or, in the vernacular...go foch yourself.

Every thing you do is offensive, you low life offish pig.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:13:56 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...


Actually, China, Russia, and the United States are all heading in the same
direction, towards a repressive society operated only for the benefit of
the very few very rich.


Are you and Larry related?

Eisboch


He says that because he feels Obama will win the presidency and have a
filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. Then we will see the oppressive
society...etc, begin.

As long as the powerful, rich Democrats can keep the uneducated masses
thinking they're getting a free lunch, the Democrats will stay in power.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

More problems for the Navy...
 

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

Actually, China, Russia, and the United States are all heading in the same
direction, towards a repressive society operated only for the benefit of
the very few very rich.


Are you and Larry related?

Eisboch




I doubt it. I don't blame any of the mess we are in on Jews or Freemasons.

More problems for the Navy...
 

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:45:44 -0400, hk wrote:
Fohttp://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff79/freebirdny/PICS/121090.jpg?t=1215712852
You know how those guys in uniform are...they think their toys are
special.

I know somebody like that.

Owns a Porker, Pointer, Boinker...

Parker - that's it - Parker. :)
Except for the uniform part. They tried to put one on him but he ran away
muttering "Look at my broccoli stem. I can't do it" (*)

(*)
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/f...g?t=1215712852

More problems for the Navy...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:42:15 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Bullschitter" wrote in message
...
Don is not Bullschitter.




Thank you!


Don, are you writing to yourself again?

:)
--
** Good Day! **

John H

I haven't, I don't and I will never engage in writing to myrself.

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:41:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


wrote in message
et...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:23:56 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


BTW .... Uncle Z is considered by many (me included) to be one of the
worst things that ever happened to the US Navy.

Eisboch

Why is that?


While CNO, he instituted many liberal "social" changes in the Navy that
really did nothing to improve the character or spirit of a military force.
He was famous for his "Z-Grams" which were issued on a regular basis, much
like a modern day Blog.

Others may disagree, but I don't think his policies were productive.

When I left at the end of '67 everything was shipshape.
A bottle on board was a major scandal, and got one 1st class busted to
3rd.
When I did some reserve duty in '75 guys were getting caught with LSD
and pot, and when I visited my old can it was listing 15 degrees.
And the fireroom was nasty. Asked the top watch if he could show me
the valve for the 2B boiler casing steam smothering system, and he had
no clue.
But that kind of stuff only sinks a ship.
What I hold most against Z is putting every swabbie in a Chief uniform
for dress, and replacing dungarees with black close weave crap.
They eventually went back to bells.
Nothing more comfortable than a well worn set of dungarees.

--Vic

More problems for the Navy...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:24:40 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:42:15 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"Bullschitter" wrote in message
...
Don is not Bullschitter.




Thank you!


Don, are you writing to yourself again?

:)
--
** Good Day! **

John H

I haven't, I don't and I will never engage in writing to myrself.


I don't know myrself, I was talking about yourself!
--
** Good Day! **

John H


Him too...bank on it!

More problems for the Navy...
 

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:12:05 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

I post under one handle, you liar. You're getting so you lie almost as
much as Harry, warp17.

Nearly everyone at alt.folklore.urban has been posting under their
real name for years, in some cases more than a decade. There are no
known cases of this causing any problems. So why bother with a handle?

Casady

More problems for the Navy...
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:12:05 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

I post under one handle, you liar. You're getting so you lie almost as
much as Harry, warp17.

Nearly everyone at alt.folklore.urban has been posting under their
real name for years, in some cases more than a decade. There are no
known cases of this causing any problems. So why bother with a handle?

Casady


Because certain posters here, such as "Reggie," realize that if they
posted with their real names, someone with low brain output like Loogy
would "track them down," knock on their front door and punch them in the
nose for their never-ending snarky comments.

Couple years ago, there was some idiot who claimed to be a Thai living
in Canada who threatened to come to my house and knock in the front
door. I assured him I would blow his head clean off his body with one of
my shotguns. Further, the local sheriff assured me that I would be well
within my rights, even though at the time my recollection is that the
"castle doctrine" was not the law in my state.

It's the loud-mouthed cowards and schittheads who hide their IDs here.

If memory serves, Loogy is so stupid he thinks that my posting with my
initials is my attempt to post anonymously.

More problems for the Navy...
 

hk wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:12:05 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

I post under one handle, you liar. You're getting so you lie almost as
much as Harry, warp17.

Nearly everyone at alt.folklore.urban has been posting under their
real name for years, in some cases more than a decade. There are no
known cases of this causing any problems. So why bother with a handle?

Casady


Because certain posters here, such as "Reggie," realize that if they
posted with their real names, someone with low brain output like Loogy
would "track them down," knock on their front door and punch them in the
nose for their never-ending snarky comments.

Couple years ago, there was some idiot who claimed to be a Thai living
in Canada who threatened to come to my house and knock in the front
door. I assured him I would blow his head clean off his body with one of
my shotguns. Further, the local sheriff assured me that I would be well
within my rights, even though at the time my recollection is that the
"castle doctrine" was not the law in my state.

It's the loud-mouthed cowards and schittheads who hide their IDs here.

If memory serves, Loogy is so stupid he thinks that my posting with my
initials is my attempt to post anonymously.



There are a few Harry Krause's in MD, I am the only Reginald P. Smithers
III in rec.boats. Unless you post your Name, address and telephone
number, you are more anonymous than I am.