On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:59:01 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:17:00 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Eisboch" wrote in message
om...

"-rick-" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:

I am watching ..... and listening. I see a whole bunch of noise, spin
and condemnations, but where's the "confirmation" you speak of. All I
hear is others saying, like you, "It is confirmed". Yet ..... were is
the confirmation? What have I missed?

Did you happen to catch this?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=93319762

"listen now"

Thanks. I listened to the whole interview. The truth remains invisible,
since his primary sources are currently denying the story, but he makes a
compelling case.

For some reason this whole affair reminds me of the still circulating
theories that FDR "knew" of the impending Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
but did nothing because he needed a reason to convince the American public
that going to war was necessary.

BTW, for those interested in the concept of history repeating itself,
here's a link to a FDR conspiracy story that offers "proof".

What these guys don't understand is that they are as bad as Larry.

Somebody writes a book, nobody reads it, but for some reason it's
cited as "proof" of this, that or the other thing.

Humans love conspiracy's. Its' just like the whole "Dick Cheney" is
an evil Oil Man - Obama tried to link everything to Dick Cheney and
his oil friends. It's all a huge conspiracy.

If Dick Cheney's energy plan is such an inherent evil, then why did
Obama vote for it? (McCain didn't by the way).

It's all bull****. Nobody knows for sure - it's all guess work.

By the way, it's called "connecting the dots".

http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk...Conspiracy.jpg

Lots of dots make lots of connections no matter how vague.

~~ snerk ~~

On Aug 8, 6:10 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:59:01 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing



wrote:
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:17:00 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
om...

"-rick-" wrote in message
om...
Eisboch wrote:

I am watching ..... and listening. I see a whole bunch of noise, spin
and condemnations, but where's the "confirmation" you speak of. All I
hear is others saying, like you, "It is confirmed". Yet ..... were is
the confirmation? What have I missed?

Did you happen to catch this?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=93319762

"listen now"

Thanks. I listened to the whole interview. The truth remains invisible,
since his primary sources are currently denying the story, but he makes a
compelling case.

For some reason this whole affair reminds me of the still circulating
theories that FDR "knew" of the impending Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
but did nothing because he needed a reason to convince the American public
that going to war was necessary.

BTW, for those interested in the concept of history repeating itself,
here's a link to a FDR conspiracy story that offers "proof".

What these guys don't understand is that they are as bad as Larry.

Somebody writes a book, nobody reads it, but for some reason it's
cited as "proof" of this, that or the other thing.

Humans love conspiracy's. Its' just like the whole "Dick Cheney" is
an evil Oil Man - Obama tried to link everything to Dick Cheney and
his oil friends. It's all a huge conspiracy.

If Dick Cheney's energy plan is such an inherent evil, then why did
Obama vote for it? (McCain didn't by the way).

It's all bull****. Nobody knows for sure - it's all guess work.

By the way, it's called "connecting the dots".

http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk...Conspiracy.jpg

Lots of dots make lots of connections no matter how vague.

~~ snerk ~~

Speaking of "conspiracy" , Larry loves this kind of stuff.

i got your "Conspiracy" right here....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UQ5CHifqMs

Plenty for everybody, too!