![]() |
Today's Feeeshing Report
On Aug 4, 4:09*pm, JimH wrote:
On Aug 4, 3:58*pm, wrote: On Aug 4, 3:56*pm, wrote: On Aug 4, 3:46*pm, JimH wrote: On Aug 4, 1:27 pm, wrote: On Aug 4, 12:45 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 4, 12:20 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:AIKdnS2vS897jgrVnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@comcast. com... In my opinion and in the opinion of many, any adult who allows small children to race motorcycles is encouraging reckless endangerment and more, and under the right circumstances, child abuse charges could be brought. How about organized youth football, soccer, baseball, hockey or golf? * *All have inherent danger of injuries. * With the proper equipment, supervision, and correctly sized dirt bike, I am not sure it's any more dangerous than the other activities I mentioned. Eisboch There's a possibility of injury with many sports activities, of course, but adding in the element of motorization, speed, gasoline, vehicles that might weigh several hundred pounds, and bumpy courses, and the resulting injuries can be very serious. I don't believe "tackle" football should be played until high school. In all the years I played "organized" baseball in New Haven, I never saw a serious injury, and that includes Little League, Pony League, Babe Ruth League and Industrial League. Lots of bumps and bruises, strained muscles, et cetera, but no one was knocked unconscious or suffered a debilitating spinal column injury. Little kids have no business running motorized vehicles. What about the stories of you operating a motorized jon boat at the age of 6? -- This NG post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, seeing how he acts, I am sure any trained professional would wonder if that was the only type of abuse wafa suffered as a child.. The kind of hate he spews suggests he lost trust in humanity long ago. The fact is, Activists are activists. Wafa is living proof that especially liberal activists have little problem letting emotion and agenda get in the way of integerity or decency. As to Donnies post, the emotionally driven statements are clear proof that although educated, they are activists. Probably looking at the sport from one point of view. Most of them probably had their opinions before the study, or had it fed to them by the govt that runs the fast failing medical system up there. On to the next grant, and another easy target. Geeze this job is so hard...;) Do you actually read any of the documents you say you read? That report Don cited was from a group of pediatric surgeons. Do you even know what a pediatric surgeon does? "Emotionally driven statements..." from pediatric surgeons, on the subject of minimizing the number of kids they have to try to repair. Yeah, to someone like you, that's "emotionally driven liberal activism." You probably are a smoker or ex smoker, too, right? Were you resentful when doctors in this country said smoking caused cancer?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pssst, hey idiot, the article was about one type of equipment, and one only. Nothing about any other sport or activity, so what do you compare it to? Here, learn something, instead of knee jerking a response just to try and get someone to notice your pathetic ass. Tonino used data from the U.S. Consumer Produce Safety Commission on injuries treated in emergency rooms. The Top 15: Basketball: 512,213 Bicycling: 485,669 Football: 418,260 Soccer: 174,686 Baseball: 155,898 Skateboards: 112,544 Trampolines: 108,029 Softball: 106,884 Swimming/Diving: 82,354 Horseback riding: 73,576 Weightlifting: 65,716 Volleyball: 52,091 Golf: 47,360 Roller skating: 35,003 Wrestling: 33,734 What age group is considered in the report you quoted? *Can you provide a link? =========================================== Here is one from the Consumer Products Safety Commission for 4 wheel ATV's (note table 4): http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/atv99.pdf ============================================ http://pediatrics.aappublications.or...full/120/1/134 OBJECTIVES. The goals were to describe the epidemiological features of pediatric nonautomobile motorized vehicle-related injuries sustained between 1990 and 2003 and to compare all-terrain vehicle-related injuries with other types of nonautomobile motorized vehicle-related injuries. METHODS. An analysis of nationally representative pediatric nonautomobile motorized vehicle-related injury data from the US Consumer Product Safety Commission National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was performed. RESULTS. Nationally, an estimated 1203800 children were treated in hospital emergency departments for nonautomobile motorized vehicle- related injuries between 1990 and 2003. These children had a mean age of 12.7 years (range: 1 month to 19 years), and 77.0% were male. The majority of injuries were associated with all-terrain vehicles (44.8%), 2-wheeled off-road vehicles (21.1%), and go-carts/buggies (13.7%). The most common diagnoses were contusions/abrasions (28.3%), fractures (24.2%), and lacerations (20.0%). Overall, the number of injuries increased 86% from 70500 injuries in 1990 to 130900 injuries in 2003. The numbers of all-terrain vehicle-related, 2-wheeled off- road vehicle-related, 2-wheeled on-road vehicle-related, and go-cart/ buggy-related injuries all increased significantly from 1990 to 2003. There were greater proportions of all-terrain vehicle-associated injuries among children ™16 years of age (48.0%) and children 12 to 15 years of age (46.6%) than among children 12 years of age (40.3%). Conversely, the proportion of other nonautomobile motorized vehicle- related injuries among children 12 years of age (47.2%) was greater than that among children 12 to 15 years of age (30.3%) and children ™16 years of age (23.0%). CONCLUSIONS. Although most public health and legislative attention to date has been focused on all-terrain vehicles, parents, children, and public officials should be educated about the injury risk that all types of nonautomobile motorized vehicles pose to children. ====================================== http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retri...2234680214262X Background/Purpose: Despite statements by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) against the use of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) by children under the age of 16 years, nearly half of ATV-related injuries and over 35% of all ATV-related deaths continue to occur in this age group. ====================================== You have your head in the sand if you do not think off road riding is not dangerous for children.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You have you head in your ass or else don't know what to hell you are talking about. How many of those were the result of being at a sanctioned track, with a great deal of rules in place, with the rider equipped with the best safety gear, with the rider trained to not go beyond his ability, etc?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They are just trolling, I answered Bill, as he is not a liar and is capable of honest debate... I gave you links. *Go ahead and keep you head in the sand Scotty.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - it's no wonder your kid joined the military as opposed to going to college. He probably wanted to get to hell away from you, he was tired of hearing you whine and cry about everything. Plus, he needed to get out of his padded safety cell. |
Today's Feeeshing Report
On Aug 4, 6:08*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. wrote: Do you actually read any of the documents you say you read? That report Don cited was from a group of pediatric surgeons. Do you even know what a pediatric surgeon does? The report also had absolutely nothing to do with small, two wheeled, dirt bike motorcycles. Eisboch That's why the new Jet is a 200 cc five speed monster.. If I put the small sprocket on the back it will do 75 ;) |
Today's Feeeshing Report
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
DK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: hk wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I would however love to meet Salty if anyone has his real info.. Although I suspect if he were outed here he would shut up faster than kanter did when he was outed. Check with your local FBI office. Now there's a *corrupt* federal agency if ever there was one. I wonder if the FBI's labs are still playing around with evidence to help support prosecutors. Do you remember when you told us that you contacted the FBI because someone left a message to you on your wife's work number? I believe there was more than one - according to WAFA. That was the suicide hotline (or something) that was monitored 24/7 by the police. Yeah, a suicide hot line monitored by the police and handled by voice mail. Got it. No editing... I have three phone numbers. The phone number listed is not one of mine. It has never been one of mine. The phone number *did* belong to an after-hours message recording hotline my wife maintained for her most mentally disturbed patients. Some of these troubled souls were court-ordered referrals. *Every* call to that phone number--every call--was recorded AND because of the nature of the line, my wife had the ability to alert the telephone company to trace the phone number of every incoming call to that line, *even* if the person making the call tried to block his number. Why, you might ask? Because when you are dealing with suicidal people, they'll liable to tell their therapist over the phone that they are planning to take their life. If the therapist believes the threat is real, she or he will want to dispatch emergency srvices and perhaps the police. In the years my wife has provided this pro bono service, she has never received a threatening or abusive call from a mentally ill patient or court-ordered referral. However, after the ranking Flaming * of this newsgroup posted the hotline number in this newsgroup, she received a number of abusive, foul-mouthed AND life-threatening calls. These were mostly directed at me but, of course, I never received them BECAUSE (duh!) the phone is not mine and I've never answered it. Naturally, my wife alerted the authorities, with whom she works closely because of her court-referred patients. The authorities are investigating the callers and have involved both the FBI *and* authorities in other states, including Florida, Georgia, California and Texas. Working with the telephone company, the authorities have been able to trace the origin of virtually every abusive call. And, of course, they have the tape recordings of the abusive messages. Several suspects have been identified. I really don't know what the outcome of all this will be. We haven't had an update in several weeks, nor are either of us here that interested in the sleazeballs that would make such calls. The phone number, of course, is "wired," so when the obnoxious calls came in from the idiot rec.boaters, the numbers were easy enough to trace. The local police handled a complaint, the local telco was involved and when it was discovered the point of origin was out of state, the FBI got involved. At least one of the idiots was caught and prosecuted. As far as I can tell, he has not posted here again |
Today's Feeeshing Report
On Aug 5, 9:43*pm, DK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: DK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: hk wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I would however love to meet Salty if anyone has his real info.. Although I suspect if he were outed here he would shut up faster than kanter did when he was outed. Check with your local FBI office. Now there's a *corrupt* federal agency if ever there was one. I wonder if the FBI's labs are still playing around with evidence to help support prosecutors. Do you remember when you told us that you contacted the FBI because someone left a message to you on your wife's work number? I believe there was more than one - according to WAFA. *That was the suicide hotline (or something) that was monitored 24/7 by the police. Yeah, a suicide hot line monitored by the police and handled by voice mail. Got it. *No editing... I have three phone numbers. The phone number listed is not * one of * mine. It has never been one of mine. The phone number *did* * belong to an * after-hours message recording hotline my wife maintained for her * most * mentally disturbed patients. Some of these troubled souls were * court-ordered referrals. *Every* call to that phone number--every * call--was recorded AND because of the nature of the line, my * wife had * the ability to alert the telephone company to trace the phone * number of * every incoming call to that line, *even* if the person making * the call * tried to block his number. * * Why, you might ask? Because when you are dealing with suicidal * people, * they'll liable to tell their therapist over the phone that they are * planning to take their life. If the therapist believes the * threat is * real, she or he will want to dispatch emergency srvices and * perhaps the * police. * * In the years my wife has provided this pro bono service, she has * never * received a threatening or abusive call from a mentally ill * patient or * court-ordered referral. However, after the ranking Flaming * * of this * newsgroup posted the hotline number in this newsgroup, she * received a * number of abusive, foul-mouthed AND life-threatening calls. * These were * mostly directed at me but, of course, I never received them BECAUSE * (duh!) the phone is not mine and I've never answered it. * Naturally, my wife alerted the authorities, with whom she works * closely * because of her court-referred patients. The authorities are * investigating the callers and have involved both the FBI *and* * authorities in other states, including Florida, Georgia, * California and * Texas. Working with the telephone company, the authorities have * been * able to trace the origin of virtually every abusive call. And, of * course, they have the tape recordings of the abusive messages. * Several * suspects have been identified. I really don't know what the * outcome of * all this will be. We haven't had an update in several weeks, nor * are * either of us here that interested in the sleazeballs that would * make * such calls. * * * The phone number, of course, is "wired," so when the obnoxious * calls came in * from the idiot rec.boaters, the numbers were easy enough to * trace. The local * police handled a complaint, the local telco was involved and * when it was * discovered the point of origin was out of state, the FBI got * involved. At * least one of the idiots was caught and prosecuted. As far as I * can tell, he * has not posted here again- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Holy cow.. what a load of crap.... !!!! LOL... |
Today's Feeeshing Report
DK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: DK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: hk wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I would however love to meet Salty if anyone has his real info.. Although I suspect if he were outed here he would shut up faster than kanter did when he was outed. Check with your local FBI office. Now there's a *corrupt* federal agency if ever there was one. I wonder if the FBI's labs are still playing around with evidence to help support prosecutors. Do you remember when you told us that you contacted the FBI because someone left a message to you on your wife's work number? I believe there was more than one - according to WAFA. That was the suicide hotline (or something) that was monitored 24/7 by the police. Yeah, a suicide hot line monitored by the police and handled by voice mail. Got it. No editing... I have three phone numbers. The phone number listed is not one of mine. It has never been one of mine. The phone number *did* belong to an after-hours message recording hotline my wife maintained for her most mentally disturbed patients. Some of these troubled souls were court-ordered referrals. *Every* call to that phone number--every call--was recorded AND because of the nature of the line, my wife had the ability to alert the telephone company to trace the phone number of every incoming call to that line, *even* if the person making the call tried to block his number. Why, you might ask? Because when you are dealing with suicidal people, they'll liable to tell their therapist over the phone that they are planning to take their life. If the therapist believes the threat is real, she or he will want to dispatch emergency srvices and perhaps the police. In the years my wife has provided this pro bono service, she has never received a threatening or abusive call from a mentally ill patient or court-ordered referral. However, after the ranking Flaming * of this newsgroup posted the hotline number in this newsgroup, she received a number of abusive, foul-mouthed AND life-threatening calls. These were mostly directed at me but, of course, I never received them BECAUSE (duh!) the phone is not mine and I've never answered it. Naturally, my wife alerted the authorities, with whom she works closely because of her court-referred patients. The authorities are investigating the callers and have involved both the FBI *and* authorities in other states, including Florida, Georgia, California and Texas. Working with the telephone company, the authorities have been able to trace the origin of virtually every abusive call. And, of course, they have the tape recordings of the abusive messages. Several suspects have been identified. I really don't know what the outcome of all this will be. We haven't had an update in several weeks, nor are either of us here that interested in the sleazeballs that would make such calls. The phone number, of course, is "wired," so when the obnoxious calls came in from the idiot rec.boaters, the numbers were easy enough to trace. The local police handled a complaint, the local telco was involved and when it was discovered the point of origin was out of state, the FBI got involved. At least one of the idiots was caught and prosecuted. As far as I can tell, he has not posted here again Wow, now that we know she is a social worker on the staff of the Bricklayers Employee's Assistance Program, it is obvious that not a word of this diatribe is true. "Pro Bono" work, yeah right. LOL |
Today's Feeeshing Report
|
Today's Feeeshing Report
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:56:09 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.
LLC" wrote: Wow, now that we know she is a social worker on the staff of the Bricklayers Employee's Assistance Program, it is obvious that not a word of this diatribe is true. "Pro Bono" work, yeah right. LOL Guys - pick on Harry all you want - wives and family should be off limits. Seriously. |
Today's Feeeshing Report
On Aug 5, 10:50*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:56:09 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. LLC" wrote: Wow, now that we know she is a social worker on the staff of the Bricklayers Employee's Assistance Program, it is obvious that not a word of this diatribe is true. *"Pro Bono" work, yeah right. *LOL Guys - pick on Harry all you want - wives and family should be off limits. Seriously. Have you seen the **** wafa, that filthy scim salty, and their crew write about us and our families? |
Today's Feeeshing Report
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:56:09 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. LLC" wrote: Wow, now that we know she is a social worker on the staff of the Bricklayers Employee's Assistance Program, it is obvious that not a word of this diatribe is true. "Pro Bono" work, yeah right. LOL Guys - pick on Harry all you want - wives and family should be off limits. Seriously. Reggie is and always has been a dirtbag and a coward. If he had to reveal his real name in his posts here, he'd be hiding in a corner, ****ing his pants. I wasn't aware he was pulling this crap again, since he's in my usenet septic tank, along with the rest of Seven. |
Today's Feeeshing Report
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com