An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:15:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:57 am, JimH wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:55 am, wrote:





On Jul 6, 9:12 pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:59 pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote:
12:35 Harry gets out of jail
12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot
Who got booted, how long?
I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. I think Chuck gave him an
indeterminate sentence.
He-he. My prediction came true.
You guys keep falling like flies. Learn to behave and you won't get
banned.
You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR
is next.
This is just too funny.
Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of
Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking
about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat?
Whatever you say 'hidden'. ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you think I'm Hidden, you must be dumber than a post. He IS someone
from here, though.
Now, can you answer the question? After all, it was YOU that said if
you "follow the rules" you won't get banned. What rule was broken by
hidden?


It really is easy to understand why Hidden was put in time out.
Everyone knows Harry does not own a Lobster Boat, so when Hidden
mentioned the topic, it was making fun of Harry's obsession with
fabricating a fictional persona for UseNet.

Chuck wanted to nip it in the bud, so he put Hidden in time out. I
would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would be put
in time out also.

If what you say is true, then Chuck must believe that Harry's Lobsta boat
is a fabrication. That's hard to believe!

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

On Jul 7, 9:15*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:57 am, JimH wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:55 am, wrote:

On Jul 6, 9:12 pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:59 pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote:
12:35 Harry gets out of jail
12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot
Who got booted, how long?
I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him an
indeterminate sentence.
He-he. *My prediction came true.
You guys keep falling like flies. * Learn to behave and you won't get
banned.
You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR
is next.
This is just too funny.
Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of
Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking
about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat?
Whatever you say 'hidden'. * ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you think I'm Hidden, you must be dumber than a post. He IS someone
from here, though.
Now, can you answer the question? After all, it was YOU that said if
you "follow the rules" you won't get banned. What rule was broken by
hidden?

It really is easy to understand why Hidden was put in time out.
Everyone knows Harry does not own a Lobster Boat, so when Hidden
mentioned the topic, it was making fun of Harry's obsession with
fabricating a fictional persona for UseNet.

Chuck wanted to nip it in the bud, so he put Hidden in time out. *I
would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would be put
in time out also.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry calling other people liars!!!!! THAT takes the cake!

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:15:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:57 am, JimH wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:55 am, wrote:





On Jul 6, 9:12 pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:59 pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote:
12:35 Harry gets out of jail
12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot
Who got booted, how long?
I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. I think Chuck gave him
an
indeterminate sentence.
He-he. My prediction came true.
You guys keep falling like flies. Learn to behave and you won't get
banned.
You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR
is next.
This is just too funny.
Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of
Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking
about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat?
Whatever you say 'hidden'. ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you think I'm Hidden, you must be dumber than a post. He IS someone
from here, though.
Now, can you answer the question? After all, it was YOU that said if
you "follow the rules" you won't get banned. What rule was broken by
hidden?


It really is easy to understand why Hidden was put in time out.
Everyone knows Harry does not own a Lobster Boat, so when Hidden
mentioned the topic, it was making fun of Harry's obsession with
fabricating a fictional persona for UseNet.

Chuck wanted to nip it in the bud, so he put Hidden in time out. I
would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would be put
in time out also.

If what you say is true, then Chuck must believe that Harry's Lobsta boat
is a fabrication. That's hard to believe!

I believe that Chuck is smarter than you give him credit for...not that it
would be hard to see through the Dwarf Armys' awkward attempts at
instigating, agitating ,and facilitating. Mmmm facilitating..isn't that
what you're doing right now?

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

On Jul 7, 10:45*am, "Don White" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:15:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:57 am, JimH wrote:
On Jul 7, 7:55 am, wrote:

On Jul 6, 9:12 pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:59 pm, "Jim" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote:
12:35 Harry gets out of jail
12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot
Who got booted, how long?
I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him
an
indeterminate sentence.
He-he. *My prediction came true.
You guys keep falling like flies. * Learn to behave and you won't get
banned.
You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR
is next.
This is just too funny.
Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of
Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking
about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat?
Whatever you say 'hidden'. * ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If you think I'm Hidden, you must be dumber than a post. He IS someone
from here, though.
Now, can you answer the question? After all, it was YOU that said if
you "follow the rules" you won't get banned. What rule was broken by
hidden?

It really is easy to understand why Hidden was put in time out.
Everyone knows Harry does not own a Lobster Boat, so when Hidden
mentioned the topic, it was making fun of Harry's obsession with
fabricating a fictional persona for UseNet.

Chuck wanted to nip it in the bud, so he put Hidden in time out. *I
would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would be put
in time out also.

If what you say is true, then Chuck must believe that Harry's Lobsta boat
is a fabrication. That's hard to believe!

I believe that Chuck is smarter than you give him credit for...not that it
would be hard to see through the Dwarf Armys' awkward attempts at
instigating, agitating ,and facilitating. *Mmmm *facilitating..isn't that
what you're doing right now?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don, honest question for you, seeing how the others who laud Chuck's
place won't answer. Why would someone be binned for asking someone a
question about fuel burn rates on a boat that that person has stated
several hundred times over the years that he owns?

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

On Jul 7, 11:50*am, Gene Kearns
wrote:

And I, for one, think he is 100% right.


I reluctantly agree. I think I was "hidden".. could be wrong
though;)

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:50:41 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:06:45 -0400, Jim penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|12:35 Harry gets out of jail
|12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot

I missed this message on the other board, until today, so I'll
paraphrase it:

You are going to get booted if you mention another poster in a
derogatory manner. I would assume that includes any remark that is
sure to lead to nowhere other than a defensive comeback.

Let me suggest this litmus test: before you touch the keyboard, ask
yourself this, "Am I defending __________ ?" If so, push the keyboard
back, go get a cold one, and take some quality time to think of
something to post that is non defensive and boating related. I'm
betting that if you don't, you'll perpetually remain booted......

And I, for one, think he is 100% right.

It would seem that a simple rule would suffice: Anything that may **** off
Harry will cause one to be booted.

No?

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

Gene Kearns wrote:
Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.

Does said boat in questions exist? Has said boat in questions ever
existed. Do you believe said boat in questions ever was in possession of
Harry Krause?

Aren't you the least bit curious as to the disposition of said boat? Was
it sunk for to submit a false insurance claim?

Wouldn't you like to know how much fuel said boat consumes on an average
day out cruising the bay?

How far do you suppose somebody will push the "I'm not touching you"
routine before they finally conclude there isn't any payoff (at
Chucks)?

Regardless of the location where the question is asked why is the
questions off limits? With Harry's insistence that everyone post
personal information about themselves and their possessions why is it
off limits to ask Harry about his possessions?

Please step away from the sandbox.....

Seems to me that the sandbox has rules but, those rules don't apply
evenly too all who play in the sandbox.

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. com...

Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no
helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question
and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking
of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature.

How far do you suppose somebody will push the "I'm not touching you"
routine before they finally conclude there isn't any payoff (at
Chucks)?

Please step away from the sandbox.....

--


Couldn't have said it better myself Gene.

An emerging pattern at Chucks place
 

"John H." wrote in message
...

It would seem that a simple rule would suffice: Anything that may **** off
Harry will cause one to be booted.

No?

Sigh! Wasn't Harry 'binned' (as the dwarfs say) for posting something
thet might offend you or your loyal but disobedient army.