|
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:06:45 -0400, Jim penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |12:35 Harry gets out of jail |12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot I missed this message on the other board, until today, so I'll paraphrase it: You are going to get booted if you mention another poster in a derogatory manner. I would assume that includes any remark that is sure to lead to nowhere other than a defensive comeback. Let me suggest this litmus test: before you touch the keyboard, ask yourself this, "Am I defending __________ ?" If so, push the keyboard back, go get a cold one, and take some quality time to think of something to post that is non defensive and boating related. I'm betting that if you don't, you'll perpetually remain booted...... And I, for one, think he is 100% right. I do, too, and I told him so. Further, there are no members of the Seven Dwarfs here to whom I will respond at Chuck's Place. So...if you a member of the Schitty Seven here (Herring, "Reggie," "Florida Jim," "BAR," Loogy, JustWait, and whoever the floating idiot of the day in that group is, don't expect me to climb into your litter box there for any reason. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 12:30*pm, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 07:55:17 -0700 (PDT), penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |On Jul 7, 10:45*am, "Don White" wrote: | "John H." wrote in message | . .. | | | | | | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:15:07 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is | Here wrote: || wrote: | On Jul 7, 7:57 am, JimH wrote: | On Jul 7, 7:55 am, wrote: | | On Jul 6, 9:12 pm, JimH wrote: | On Jul 6, 8:59 pm, "Jim" wrote:| wrote in message | ... | On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote: | 12:35 Harry gets out of jail | 12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot | Who got booted, how long? | I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him | an | indeterminate sentence. | He-he. *My prediction came true. | You guys keep falling like flies. * Learn to behave and you won't get | banned. | You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR | is next. | This is just too funny. | Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of | Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking | about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat? | Whatever you say 'hidden'. * ;-)- Hide quoted text - | | - Show quoted text - | | If you think I'm Hidden, you must be dumber than a post. He IS someone | from here, though. | Now, can you answer the question? After all, it was YOU that said if | you "follow the rules" you won't get banned. What rule was broken by | hidden? | | It really is easy to understand why Hidden was put in time out. | Everyone knows Harry does not own a Lobster Boat, so when Hidden | mentioned the topic, it was making fun of Harry's obsession with | fabricating a fictional persona for UseNet. | | Chuck wanted to nip it in the bud, so he put Hidden in time out. *I | would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would be put | in time out also. | | If what you say is true, then Chuck must believe that Harry's Lobsta boat | is a fabrication. That's hard to believe! | | I believe that Chuck is smarter than you give him credit for...not that it | would be hard to see through the Dwarf Armys' awkward attempts at | instigating, agitating ,and facilitating. *Mmmm *facilitating..isn't that | what you're doing right now?- Hide quoted text - | | - Show quoted text - | |Don, honest question for you, seeing how the others who laud Chuck's |place won't answer. Why would someone be binned for asking someone a |question about fuel burn rates on a boat that that person has stated |several hundred times over the years that he owns? Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. How far do you suppose somebody will push the "I'm not touching you" routine before they finally conclude there isn't any payoff (at Chucks)? Please step away from the sandbox..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I wonder how come, then that Harry can call people over at Chuck's boatless? If Harry claims to have a large lobster boat, how is it inflammatory to ask about it? |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 1:02*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... It would seem that a simple rule would suffice: Anything that may **** off Harry will cause one to be booted. No? Sigh! * *Wasn't Harry 'binned' (as the dwarfs say) for posting something thet might offend you or your loyal but disobedient army. You claim to have knowledge of Harry's Zimmerman like lobster boat, so how is it inflammatory to ask a question about someone's boat? It is a boating forum after all. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:18:58 -0700 (PDT), penned |I wonder how come, then that Harry can call people over at Chuck's |boatless? If Harry claims to have a large lobster boat, how is it |inflammatory to ask about it? If said in a pejorative manner, I would assume that would be a bootable offense..... There's no such statement by me at Chuck's Steakhouse. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
wrote in message ... On Jul 7, 1:02 pm, "Don White" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... It would seem that a simple rule would suffice: Anything that may **** off Harry will cause one to be booted. No? Sigh! Wasn't Harry 'binned' (as the dwarfs say) for posting something thet might offend you or your loyal but disobedient army. You claim to have knowledge of Harry's Zimmerman like lobster boat, so how is it inflammatory to ask a question about someone's boat? It is a boating forum after all. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Huh? What knowledge have I claimed to have? |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 2:01*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jul 7, 1:02 pm, "Don White" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . It would seem that a simple rule would suffice: Anything that may **** off Harry will cause one to be booted. No? Sigh! Wasn't Harry 'binned' (as the dwarfs say) for posting something thet might offend you or your loyal but disobedient army. You claim to have knowledge of Harry's Zimmerman like lobster boat, so how is it inflammatory to ask a question about someone's boat? It is a boating forum after all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------- Huh? *What knowledge have I claimed to have? You've said you've seen proof in pictures of it. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | |Does said boat in questions exist? I don't know, nor do I care. I understand, integrity means nothing to you? |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | |Does said boat in questions exist? I don't know, nor do I care. I understand, integrity means nothing to you? Bertie Robbins, known far and wide as POT-KETTLE-BLACK, and a little less widely as a member of the Sissyhood of the Seven Dwarfs. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:51:36 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote:
If some of you guys don't like Chucks board... or just think you could do better.... why don't you just start your own board. This ProBoards stuff looks pretty easy and it is free: http://www.proboards.com/ Fashion it YOUR way, talk about who and what you want to and, as moderator, you can boot anybody you care to, for any reason whatsoever...... You can have it YOUR way...... Damn, now ain't that an idea. ;-) |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 2:05*pm, wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:01*pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jul 7, 1:02 pm, "Don White" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . It would seem that a simple rule would suffice: Anything that may **** off Harry will cause one to be booted. No? Sigh! Wasn't Harry 'binned' (as the dwarfs say) for posting something thet might offend you or your loyal but disobedient army. You claim to have knowledge of Harry's Zimmerman like lobster boat, so how is it inflammatory to ask a question about someone's boat? It is a boating forum after all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**--------------- Huh? *What knowledge have I claimed to have? You've said you've seen proof in pictures of it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not really, he has been quite careful to never quite say that.. Carefully worded, it's a subtle nuance thing.. If he were a conservative it would be called a lie;) |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
|
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
wrote in message t... On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:51:36 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: If some of you guys don't like Chucks board... or just think you could do better.... why don't you just start your own board. This ProBoards stuff looks pretty easy and it is free: http://www.proboards.com/ Fashion it YOUR way, talk about who and what you want to and, as moderator, you can boot anybody you care to, for any reason whatsoever...... You can have it YOUR way...... Damn, now ain't that an idea. ;-) It could be a terrific recruiting tool for the Dwarf Army. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
|
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 2:53*pm, BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | |Does said boat in questions exist? I don't know, nor do I care. I understand, integrity means nothing to you? I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period.... |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
|
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
"DK" wrote in message ... wrote: Don, honest question for you, seeing how the others who laud Chuck's place won't answer. Why would someone be binned for asking someone a question about fuel burn rates on a boat that that person has stated several hundred times over the years that he owns? You are posting to the dumbest of the three stooges. He relies on the other two for his "material". He will be non-responsive or reply with a one-liner. Ignore him, too and life will go on. Practice what you preach, dumbass. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message . com... On Sun, 6 Jul 2008 17:06:45 -0400, Jim penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |12:35 Harry gets out of jail |12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot If some of you guys don't like Chucks board... or just think you could do better.... why don't you just start your own board. This ProBoards stuff looks pretty easy and it is free: http://www.proboards.com/ Fashion it YOUR way, talk about who and what you want to and, as moderator, you can boot anybody you care to, for any reason whatsoever...... You can have it YOUR way...... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Chuck's board is just fine. I am among the many fans willing to pitch in and help make the board run like a switch watch. You'll see. Once the 3 stooges and a couple others are routed out, I will join in the discussions. Until then, there is work to be done. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place (for Gene)
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: wrote: | On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote: | Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | I don't know, nor do I care. | I understand, integrity means nothing to you? | | I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA | doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that | is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are | intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to | mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period.... | | | |You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with |your obsession. You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped.... assuming you want to..... Gene, I know you have the best of intentions, but I really truly believe rec.boats is so overpopulated with snarly little assholes like the Seven Dwarfs there is no hope for its salvation. The future for those who want to discuss boating in a reasonable fashion and still have fun is in moderated newsgroups or in discussion groups. Here's the final scene for an upcoming HBO movie: ....from "REC.BOATS...THE NEWSGROUP OF THE DWARFS..." You Seven Dwarfs finally really did it. You maniacs! You blew it up! God damn you! God damn you all to hell! :) |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place (for Gene)
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:53:49 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | | I don't know, nor do I care. | |I understand, integrity means nothing to you? After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. Actually, Gene, there is only "one side" discussing this particular issue, and it ain't me. :) |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:10:31 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:53:49 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | | I don't know, nor do I care. | |I understand, integrity means nothing to you? After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... We share the same opinion Gene and I've said it more than once. Well said my friend. Most excellent. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:33:43 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: wrote: | On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote: | Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | I don't know, nor do I care. | I understand, integrity means nothing to you? | | I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA | doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that | is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are | intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to | mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period.... | | | |You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with |your obsession. You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped.... assuming you want to..... Gene, I don't know where you've been, but that "...assuming you want to..." sure doesn't apply in this case. It's hard for me to believe that you would think Harry *doesn't* want this group to disappear. If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very naive. As you can see from Harry's response to your post, he will use anything as a means to drop some more crap in the group. Those who continue responding to him simply give him the means to do so. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:33:43 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:56:22 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: wrote: | On Jul 7, 2:53 pm, BAR wrote: | Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | I don't know, nor do I care. | I understand, integrity means nothing to you? | | I agree with Gene on this one.. We all care, we just know that WAFA | doesn't so it's useless going over and over it.. Not to mention, that | is Chucks place, it is moderated and has rules and if you are | intellectually honest yourself about what you percieve Loogies post to | mean, you will admit he broke the rules, period.... | | | |You Dwarf Boys ought to get together and get a group rate for help with |your obsession. You know..... that isn't a very good way to get this stopped.... assuming you want to..... Gene, I don't know where you've been, but that "...assuming you want to..." sure doesn't apply in this case. It's hard for me to believe that you would think Harry *doesn't* want this group to disappear. If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very naive. As you can see from Harry's response to your post, he will use anything as a means to drop some more crap in the group. Those who continue responding to him simply give him the means to do so. The reality is, this newsgroup has disappeared as a venue for boaters, in no small part because of the posts of you and your fellow dwarfs. And despite your wet dream, I am in communication with no one regarding ways to "make the place worse." |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:28:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:10:31 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:53:49 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | | I don't know, nor do I care. | |I understand, integrity means nothing to you? After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... We share the same opinion Gene and I've said it more than once. Well said my friend. Most excellent. The lobsta boat is old news, agreed. Loogy is about the only one using it now, and he should know better. However, I hope you'll read my response to Gene. I can't understand why folks continue to give Harry opportunities to trash the group. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:28:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:10:31 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:53:49 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | | I don't know, nor do I care. | |I understand, integrity means nothing to you? After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... We share the same opinion Gene and I've said it more than once. Well said my friend. Most excellent. The lobsta boat is old news, agreed. Loogy is about the only one using it now, and he should know better. However, I hope you'll read my response to Gene. I can't understand why folks continue to give Harry opportunities to trash the group. Perhaps if you and your fellow dwarfs spent some time putting up original boating content posts instead of spending 97% of your time here insulting those you don't like... Nah...that will never happen. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
"John H." wrote in message ... snip.. If you don't think the three of them are in fairly constant communication about what to do next to make the place worse, then I think you're very naive. snip... Johnny...are you overdosing on Twinkies again? |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message . com... After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... Well said. Anyone here longer than a month and with half a brain knows... A/ After all the harassment over the years, Harry will never disclose any additional information on any Lobster boat B/ Those who keep bringing the Lobster boat up only do it as a way to jab and agitate Harry |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
"John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:28:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:10:31 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:53:49 -0400, BAR penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Gene Kearns wrote: | On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:48:39 -0400, BAR penned the following well | considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: | | |Gene Kearns wrote: | | Because someone knew, before they asked, that there would be no | | helpful answer. There never HAS been a helpful answer to that question | | and one would reasonably conclude then, as did Chuck, that the asking | | of the question was clearly inflammatory in nature. | | | |Does said boat in questions exist? | | I don't know, nor do I care. | |I understand, integrity means nothing to you? After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... We share the same opinion Gene and I've said it more than once. Well said my friend. Most excellent. The lobsta boat is old news, agreed. Loogy is about the only one using it now, and he should know better. However, I hope you'll read my response to Gene. I can't understand why folks continue to give Harry opportunities to trash the group. John...seems to me that you loosly control an army of Sevan Dwarfs...plus have an additional 6 or 7 associates and hangers on. If you really wanted all the foolishness to stop... you'd learn to effectively control your minions for the benefit of the group. The bottom line is...too many want to roll in the gutter here and as much as you blame Harry, Jimh and me, you can't even control your own motley crew. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
Don White wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message . com... After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... Well said. Anyone here longer than a month and with half a brain knows... A/ After all the harassment over the years, Harry will never disclose any additional information on any Lobster boat B/ Those who keep bringing the Lobster boat up only do it as a way to jab and agitate Harry Attempts here and elsewhere to "jab and agitate" me will not work, a fact the stupidos who try it never seem to understand. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
|
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
Thanks, Salty. Keep spreading the message. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place (for Gene)
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:31:33 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: This should go into the dictionary as a caption to the illustration of a "Self Fulfilling Prophecy." Amen. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place (for Gene)
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:31:33 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: This should go into the dictionary as a caption to the illustration of a "Self Fulfilling Prophecy." Amen. Hey, I'm mostly *here* to watch the performing Dwarfs destroy rec.boats. If you two think you can salvage this place, go for it. But Reggie, Herring, Loogie, Florida Jim, BAR, DK, and whoever the revolving idiot of the day is, prefer it to remain as it is. If they preferred otherwise, they'd behave differently. We'll see what you fellows do to handle the Dwarfs. I'll be glad to watch. |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 7:54*am, wrote:
On Jul 6, 9:10*pm, wrote: On Jul 6, 8:59*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote: 12:35 Harry gets out of jail 12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot Who got booted, how long? I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him an indeterminate sentence. Yeah, I went and saw it. I didn't think his comment was any snarkier than the others.. Maybe it was the target? *Or maybe cause it was "hidden", either way, I am walking very lightly over there.. I did notice however, one of the top posters mentioned us by name.. but it was not a negative comment.. Either way, I still don't think there is a definate line yet, maybe the mod over there is still setting it.. Note to the stooges, I am not complaining here. I still support Chuck and his adventure.. Yeah, it was "hidden". He only asked about fuel burn on Harry's alleged lobster boat, and didn't do it in a menacing manner. Harry claims to own a lobster boat, so why would someone be banned for asking a question about it?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - By the way it was said, pea-brain... |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 7, 7:55*am, wrote:
On Jul 6, 9:12*pm, JimH wrote: On Jul 6, 8:59*pm, "Jim" wrote: wrote in message .... On Jul 6, 5:06 pm, "Jim" wrote: 12:35 Harry gets out of jail 12:56 Another of Harry's fans gets the boot Who got booted, how long? I think It was Hidden. Go look to make sure. *I think Chuck gave him an indeterminate sentence. He-he. *My prediction came true. You guys keep falling like flies. * Learn to behave and you won't get banned. You, then Scott, then John, now Loogy............my guess is that BAR is next. This is just too funny. Jim, for your information I've never posted nor am I a member of Chuck's group. I would like to ask you, what harms was the post asking about fuel burn on Harry's lobster boat?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You're stupider than your ramblings tend to identify...... Did this man...well....(LOOSLY)....fall on his head while riding an MX as a kid??? |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
I would assume if Harry mentioned his "Lobster Boat", Harry would be put in time out also. So, Harrys gonna get binned for mentioning (himself) about the boat you say he doesnt own?? You 're worse than a Soap Opera Or, maybe... A "Dwarf Opera" |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
and whoever the floating idiot of the day in that group... God....that was great. I near ****ed my pants laughing. "floating"...... |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
is a boating forum after all.
I bet he got swooped on the " Go get me a can of Steam " joke....... |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
On Jul 8, 10:23*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message . com... After having assessed both sides of this childish, stupid, inane, decade long discussion of the substance of a Zimmerman like lobster boat, If you feel it collectively describes adherence to some sort of code of moral values....... I guess your definition of "integrity" and mine differ greatly. That is, unless your are the netcops judge, jury, and executioner. Then we'd probably need to define authority..... HOWEVER, I'm no more inclined to join in that ridiculous repartee than I am the one about some boat, of which I have absolutely NO personal knowledge (and neither do you). What a wonderfully solid basis for a system of "integrity." I suggest you address all of those concerns at rec.authority.on.integrity.via.the.unkown and leave those interested boating to fend for themselves, here...... Well said. *Anyone here longer than a month and with half a brain knows.... A/ After all the harassment over the years, Harry will never disclose any additional information on any Lobster boat B/ *Those who keep bringing the Lobster boat up only do it as a way to jab and agitate Harry- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why should it agitate Harry to bring up one of his boats? |
An emerging pattern at Chucks place
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com