|
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the
first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html You are trash Harry, pure and simple. Absolutely nothing is beneath you. Yes, the minister deserved to die. Yes there are extremists on both sides of the fence. You are just one example. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... STARKE, Fla. -- Paul Hill, a right-wing conservative and former minister who said he murdered an abortion doctor and his bodyguard to save the lives of unborn babies, was executed Wednesday by injection. He was the first person put to death in the United States for anti-abortion violence. Hill, 49, was condemned for the July 29, 1994, shooting deaths of Dr. John Bayard Britton and his bodyguard, retired Air Force Lt. Col. James Herman Barrett, and the wounding of Barrett's wife outside the Ladies Center in Pensacola. As he has since the slaying, Hill showed no remorse. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
Jim wrote:
Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial comment. I suppose Hill won't be voting for the conservative candidates in the next election. But I bet you will. Amazing how virtually all the politically oriented murdering kooks the last few years have been right-wing conservatives...Hill, Osama, McVeigh, et cetera. Are you righties taught murder is the answer to political issues you cannot resolve through debate, or does the killing come naturally? -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
Anyone they kill goes unnoticed. :)
-W "bb" wrote in message Where are the similar extremists on the pro abortion side of the fence? bb |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial comment. No you didn't. You added your own text to the original story, making it appear as though that is the way it was originally written. As I said before, nothing is beneath you. You are pathetic. And a true nutcase. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial comment. No you didn't. You added your own text to the original story, making it appear as though that is the way it was originally written. I don't recall reading where anyone put you in charge of anything at all, much less deciding what is or is not an editorial comment. LOL! Any news story you now post is suspect as you have been proven to change the wording in the story to suit your needs. That is not called editorial comment. You continue to prove yourself to be a class A nutcase Harry. As I said before, nothing is beneath you. You are pathetic. And a true nutcase. High praise indeed, especially when it emanates from right-wing scum like you. Thanks. That is your only defense? On par with what a 10 year old may present. Get help Harry. Really. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
Harry - minus the "nutcase" part - he's right.
You **of all people** know the proper methods of inserting editorial comment(s) into the work of another author. I'm dissapointed. -W "Jim" wrote in message news:9Ov5b.259521$cF.81478@rwcrnsc53... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial comment. No you didn't. You added your own text to the original story, making it appear as though that is the way it was originally written. I don't recall reading where anyone put you in charge of anything at all, much less deciding what is or is not an editorial comment. LOL! Any news story you now post is suspect as you have been proven to change the wording in the story to suit your needs. That is not called editorial comment. You continue to prove yourself to be a class A nutcase Harry. As I said before, nothing is beneath you. You are pathetic. And a true nutcase. High praise indeed, especially when it emanates from right-wing scum like you. Thanks. That is your only defense? On par with what a 10 year old may present. Get help Harry. Really. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
Clams Canino wrote:
Harry - minus the "nutcase" part - he's right. You **of all people** know the proper methods of inserting editorial comment(s) into the work of another author. I'm dissapointed. -W "Jim" wrote in message news:9Ov5b.259521$cF.81478@rwcrnsc53... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial comment. No you didn't. You added your own text to the original story, making it appear as though that is the way it was originally written. I don't recall reading where anyone put you in charge of anything at all, much less deciding what is or is not an editorial comment. LOL! Any news story you now post is suspect as you have been proven to change the wording in the story to suit your needs. That is not called editorial comment. You continue to prove yourself to be a class A nutcase Harry. As I said before, nothing is beneath you. You are pathetic. And a true nutcase. High praise indeed, especially when it emanates from right-wing scum like you. Thanks. That is your only defense? On par with what a 10 year old may present. Get help Harry. Really. Oh, puh-lease. You don't really think I take any of these pathetic right-wingers here seriously. As I have stated over and over, I toss them a line or two when I feel like it, just to watch them act like Pavlov's dog. Jim is a first-rate drooler, right up there with NOYB and a few other of the "anon" righties here. I see no need to waste any time typing in "reasoned" responses to their drivel. If I did, it might be interpreted that I take any of the crap they post seriously. None of them are worth more than a few seconds of effort. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Clams Canino wrote: Harry - minus the "nutcase" part - he's right. You **of all people** know the proper methods of inserting editorial comment(s) into the work of another author. I'm dissapointed. -W "Jim" wrote in message news:9Ov5b.259521$cF.81478@rwcrnsc53... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Jim wrote: Wow, isn't it funny how you managed to get that "right wing conservative" into the first sentence when the original story did not state that? Here is the original story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2003Sep3.html Indeed, rather than just post a news story, I added editorial comment. No you didn't. You added your own text to the original story, making it appear as though that is the way it was originally written. I don't recall reading where anyone put you in charge of anything at all, much less deciding what is or is not an editorial comment. LOL! Any news story you now post is suspect as you have been proven to change the wording in the story to suit your needs. That is not called editorial comment. You continue to prove yourself to be a class A nutcase Harry. As I said before, nothing is beneath you. You are pathetic. And a true nutcase. High praise indeed, especially when it emanates from right-wing scum like you. Thanks. That is your only defense? On par with what a 10 year old may present. Get help Harry. Really. Oh, puh-lease. You don't really think I take any of these pathetic right-wingers here seriously. As I have stated over and over, I toss them a line or two when I feel like it, just to watch them act like Pavlov's dog. Jim is a first-rate drooler, right up there with NOYB and a few other of the "anon" righties here. I see no need to waste any time typing in "reasoned" responses to their drivel. If I did, it might be interpreted that I take any of the crap they post seriously. None of them are worth more than a few seconds of effort. Get help Harry. Please. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
As I was driving up the freeway late this afternoon, I dialed in the local
conservative talk radio station to see what the right wing buzz would be. The moderator, (some local), actually had a reasonable perspective: Whether or not abortion is morally right it is legal, whereas murder is neither morally right nor legal. About a third of the callers to this talk show defended Hill, and praised his actions. One guy went so far as to suggest that homosexuals should be targeted as well as abortion doctors. Scary to think that those people are loose in society- but they have a right to think any way they want until it turns into actual violence. The good news was the even with an ultra-conservative audience the majority of callers seemed to feel that Hill's case was an absolute tragedy on all fronts. Just as many people were prepared with biblical quotes to condemn Hill as were prepared with bibilcal quotes to defend his action. Some of the people on both sides left the Bible out of the question and only discussed the law and general morality. Personally, I am farther to the right on the abortion issue than 99% of the people on the planet. It should never be used for birth control. No exceptions where the only issue is birth control. Rape and situations where the mother's life could be endangered by a pregnancy.....reluctantly. BUT, the difference between Hill and me.....I'd never interfere with another person's legal right to obtain one or presume to execute somebody for perfoming one. I mean, what if Hill and I are wrong? Who are we to impose our standards on others? Hill thought he was doing God's work and was an instrument of justice. What goes around, comes around and this afternoon the instrument of justice was a lethal injection gurney. No winners in this deal. None. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... As I was driving up the freeway late this afternoon, I dialed in the local conservative talk radio station to see what the right wing buzz would be. The moderator, (some local), actually had a reasonable perspective: Whether or not abortion is morally right it is legal, whereas murder is neither morally right nor legal. Correct. About a third of the callers to this talk show defended Hill, and praised his actions. One guy went so far as to suggest that homosexuals should be targeted as well as abortion doctors. Truly an accurate representation, wouldn't you say Chuck? Or are you generalizing once again? BTW: Were the 1/3 radicals, conservatives or liberals? There are extremists among all the groups Chuck. Or didn't you know that? Your friend Harry is a prime example. Scary to think that those people are loose in society- but they have a right to think any way they want until it turns into actual violence. I agree. We have nut cases on both ends of the political spectrum. The good news was the even with an ultra-conservative audience the majority of callers seemed to feel that Hill's case was an absolute tragedy on all fronts. snip Once again you generalize, this time about the make up of the audience. Personally, I am farther to the right on the abortion issue than 99% of the people on the planet. It should never be used for birth control. No exceptions where the only issue is birth control. Rape and situations where the mother's life could be endangered by a pregnancy.....reluctantly. BUT, the difference between Hill and me.....I'd never interfere with another person's legal right to obtain one or presume to execute somebody for perfoming one. I mean, what if Hill and I are wrong? Who are we to impose our standards on others? We agree on something. Fantastic. I knew with enough work you would slowly turn around. May the force be with you Chuck. Leave the darkside behind you. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
About a third of the callers to this talk show defended Hill, and praised
his actions. One guy went so far as to suggest that homosexuals should be targeted as well as abortion doctors. Truly an accurate representation, wouldn't you say Chuck? Or are you generalizing once again? You question fails any test of basic logic. Reporting what a single caller suggested is not a "generalization," nor can it be since it only concerns a single individual. What do you mean by the first sentence? The intent is unclear. Do you agree that homosexuals should be targeted along with abortion doctors? Is that what you meant by an "accurate representation." BTW: Were the 1/3 radicals, conservatives or liberals? There are extremists among all the groups Chuck. Or didn't you know that? Your friend Harry is a prime example. Again, your question has no basis in logic. It is conceivable that the roughly 1/3 of the people who felt that Hill had acted properly and were prepared to defend his murder of the abortion doctor had *nothing* in common except their defense of Hill. Unless Harry was calling a conservative talk station in Seattle using an assumed name, there is no reason to bring him into the conversation. Scary to think that those people are loose in society- but they have a right to think any way they want until it turns into actual violence. I agree. We have nut cases on both ends of the political spectrum. I've got to clean the monitor screen. Almost thought that "Jim" agreed with Gould on something. Has to be an electronic misprint. Once again you generalize, this time about the make up of the audience. Actually, no, I do not. There is a science called demographics. Demographic studies scientifically define the nature of the audience for TV and radio programming. Demographics for this particular station is an audience that is predominantly male, primarily white, average listener age about 55, middle to upper middle income bracket. This is the station that broadcasts Limbaugh, Hannity, et al in our market. They self proclaim to be the home of "conservative talk radio" in Seattle. I'm an ultra liberal, and I often listen for short periods of time, but I can tell by the phone calls from the local audience that there are either very few liberals listening or the screener does not let them on the air. If you care to dispute my analysis, I would suggest that you first listen to the station in question. At that point we'd be discussing a single set of known variables rather than the question of whether a liberal could ever accurately represent his observation of a radio station. Personally, I am farther to the right on the abortion issue than 99% of the people on the planet. It should never be used for birth control. No exceptions where the only issue is birth control. Rape and situations where the mother's life could be endangered by a pregnancy.....reluctantly. BUT, the difference between Hill and me.....I'd never interfere with another person's legal right to obtain one or presume to execute somebody for perfoming one. I mean, what if Hill and I are wrong? Who are we to impose our standards on others? We agree on something. Fantastic. I knew with enough work you would slowly turn around. Sorry, but you get no credit for my opinion. I've felt this way for at least 30-years, soon after I came to realize/believe that all living things have a soul.....(bet we don't agree on that!) :-) |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
LOL!
If I said white, you would say black. You just love to argue Chuck. As a result, you are, however, coming across as bitter. Lighten up Chuck. The sky is not falling. The US is actually a pretty nice place to live. And don't believe everything you read or hear on the radio. Often times it is not true. ;-) |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:19:43 GMT, "Clams Canino"
wrote: Anyone they kill goes unnoticed. :) Well, I guess you have a point there. bb |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
bb wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:19:43 GMT, "Clams Canino" wrote: Anyone they kill goes unnoticed. :) Well, I guess you have a point there. bb Solipsism in rec.boats? Wow. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 22:25:57 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote: Solipsism in rec.boats? Wow. That's over my head Harry, please explain. bb |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"Jim" wrote in message
et... LOL! If I said white, you would say black. You just love to argue Chuck. As a result, you are, however, coming across as bitter. Lighten up Chuck. The sky is not falling. The US is actually a pretty nice place to live. And don't believe everything you read or hear on the radio. Often times it is not true. ;-) Another proclamation from Dennis the Menace Compton. Oftentimes more astounding than fiction. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"bb" wrote in message ... On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 22:25:57 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: Solipsism in rec.boats? Wow. That's over my head Harry, please explain. bb http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?Solipsism |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
LOL!
If I said white, you would say black. You just love to argue Chuck. As a result, you are, however, coming across as bitter. Lighten up Chuck. The sky is not falling. The US is actually a pretty nice place to live. And don't believe everything you read or hear on the radio. Often times it is not true. ;-) Personal comments are not germane to the subject at hand. While I'm sure there are many legitimate areas in which any of us could be criticized, your personal defects (or mine) are a separate topic. A debate tests ideas against one another, not personalities. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 03:53:25 GMT, "Mark Browne"
wrote: Solipsism in rec.boats? Wow. That's over my head Harry, please explain. bb http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?Solipsism I appreciate the attempt at helping me Mark. I already looked it up, but I don't see the relevance. I know they were aiming low, but it's still over my head. bb |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
|
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... LOL! If I said white, you would say black. You just love to argue Chuck. As a result, you are, however, coming across as bitter. Lighten up Chuck. The sky is not falling. The US is actually a pretty nice place to live. And don't believe everything you read or hear on the radio. Often times it is not true. ;-) Personal comments are not germane to the subject at hand. While I'm sure there are many legitimate areas in which any of us could be criticized, your personal defects (or mine) are a separate topic. A debate tests ideas against one another, not personalities. Nicely said; firm Jeffersonian debate in action! Mark Browne |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"JR North" wrote in message
... I guess from that we can assume God uses 'OO buck. JR Or a couple of jet aircraft full of people and fuel. |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
I guess from that we can assume God uses 'OO buck.
JR Gould 0738 wrote: snip Hill thought he was doing God's work -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth |
Right-Wing Doctor Killer Executed
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message None of them are worth more than a few seconds of effort. Apparently to you it was worth sacrificing what little integrity you like to believe you had left, just to slide in a pointless barb. Now we all know what you are. Everything from here on is just quibbling over price. JG I agree. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com