Where's the spam..?
 

Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...

Where's the spam..?
 

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...


The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.

Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*

Where's the spam..?
 

On May 3, 9:30*am, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...

The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.

Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*

Hmmmm.......

Where's the spam..?
 

On May 3, 9:57*am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30*am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...

The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.

Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*

Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

Where's the spam..?
 

John H. wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...


The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.

Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.


You just keep on keeping on... :)

Where's the spam..?
 

Where's the spam..?
 

On May 3, 10:15*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 3, 9:57 am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...
The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.
Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*
Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

And airplanes full of terrorists didn't crash into the Twin Towers...the
buildings were destroyed as part of a government plot, right?

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are correct on both parts. The planes were filled with innocent
victims, and the Government of Iran was probably somehow connected....
You are frekin' brilliant...

Where's the spam..?
 

On Sat, 3 May 2008 07:38:21 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On May 3, 10:15*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 3, 9:57 am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...
The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.
Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*
Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

And airplanes full of terrorists didn't crash into the Twin Towers...the
buildings were destroyed as part of a government plot, right?

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are correct on both parts. The planes were filled with innocent
victims, and the Government of Iran was probably somehow connected....
You are frekin' brilliant...

Scotty, please ignore him. He has only one agenda in mind.
--
John *H*

Where's the spam..?
 

On May 3, 11:19*am, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2008 07:38:21 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





On May 3, 10:15*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 3, 9:57 am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...
The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.
Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*
Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

And airplanes full of terrorists didn't crash into the Twin Towers...the
buildings were destroyed as part of a government plot, right?

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are correct on both parts. The planes were filled with innocent
victims, and the Government of Iran was probably somehow connected....
You are frekin' brilliant...

Scotty, please ignore him. He has only one agenda in mind.
--
John *H*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I know.. I will stop.

Where's the spam..?
 

On May 3, 10:38*am, wrote:
On May 3, 10:15*am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On May 3, 9:57 am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...
The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.
Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*
Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

And airplanes full of terrorists didn't crash into the Twin Towers...the
buildings were destroyed as part of a government plot, right?

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are correct on both parts. The planes were filled with innocent
victims, and the Government of Iran was probably somehow connected....
You are frekin' brilliant...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

****, he's back. There goes the neighborhood.......again. I hope he
doesn't bring his boyfriend back with him.

Where's the spam..?
 

On Sat, 3 May 2008 09:00:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 3, 10:38*am, wrote:
On May 3, 10:15*am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On May 3, 9:57 am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...
The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.
Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*
Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

And airplanes full of terrorists didn't crash into the Twin Towers...the
buildings were destroyed as part of a government plot, right?

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are correct on both parts. The planes were filled with innocent
victims, and the Government of Iran was probably somehow connected....
You are frekin' brilliant...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

****, he's back. There goes the neighborhood.......again. I hope he
doesn't bring his boyfriend back with him.

If you ignore him, the neighborhood will be just fine.
--
John *H*

Where's the spam..?
 

I know it's tough, but ignoring him WILL work.

--Mike

wrote in message
...
On May 3, 10:38 am, wrote:
On May 3, 10:15 am, HK wrote:





wrote:
On May 3, 9:57 am, wrote:
On May 3, 9:30 am, John H. wrote:

On Sat, 3 May 2008 06:19:01 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
Seems it came and went on a very timely schedual.. Worked out real
good for the folks running the new board, I'm just sayin'...
The last of the spam was on 30 April. Coincidentally, that was the
last of
the posts from a couple of special folks also.
Who knows, maybe it'll stay away for a while.
--
John *H*
Hmmmm.......

Hummmm.. indeed. Funny how it was here just long enough to kick start
a competing group, huh?

And airplanes full of terrorists didn't crash into the Twin Towers...the
buildings were destroyed as part of a government plot, right?

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are correct on both parts. The planes were filled with innocent
victims, and the Government of Iran was probably somehow connected....
You are frekin' brilliant...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

****, he's back. There goes the neighborhood.......again. I hope he
doesn't bring his boyfriend back with him.