|
She's nuts
This lady has been smoking some weird stuff! Wake up America!!!! Please read this carefully and then read it again and again if necessary!!! Windfall Tax on Retirement Income Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below............... Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You are not going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas , it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities! This woman is frightening. She quotes... " We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." ( I am not rich, are you) When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied: "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. "Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it". Send it on to your friends. I just did!! This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house! |
She's nuts
Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts.
While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp "Jim" wrote in message ... This lady has been smoking some weird stuff! Wake up America!!!! Please read this carefully and then read it again and again if necessary!!! Windfall Tax on Retirement Income Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below............... Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You are not going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas , it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities! This woman is frightening. She quotes... " We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." ( I am not rich, are you) When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied: "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. "Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it". Send it on to your friends. I just did!! This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house! |
She's nuts
Man, My face is beet red right now. It seemed so like her, I never doubted
it. Thanks for setting things straight. "Lu Powell" wrote in message ... Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp "Jim" wrote in message ... This lady has been smoking some weird stuff! Wake up America!!!! Please read this carefully and then read it again and again if necessary!!! Windfall Tax on Retirement Income Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below............... Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You are not going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas , it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities! This woman is frightening. She quotes... " We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." ( I am not rich, are you) When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied: "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. "Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it". Send it on to your friends. I just did!! This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house! |
She's nuts
"Jim" wrote in message ... Man, My face is beet red right now. It seemed so like her, I never doubted it. Thanks for setting things straight. "Lu Powell" wrote in message ... Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp "Jim" wrote in message ... This lady has been smoking some weird stuff! Wake up America!!!! Please read this carefully and then read it again and again if necessary!!! Windfall Tax on Retirement Income Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below............... Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You are not going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas , it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities! This woman is frightening. She quotes... " We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." ( I am not rich, are you) When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied: "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. "Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it". Send it on to your friends. I just did!! This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house! ~~ SNERK ~~ Good thing Richard isn't here anymore. You'd be embarrassing him big time. |
She's nuts
Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Man, My face is beet red right now. It seemed so like her, I never doubted it. Thanks for setting things straight. "Lu Powell" wrote in message ... Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp "Jim" wrote in message ... This lady has been smoking some weird stuff! Wake up America!!!! Please read this carefully and then read it again and again if necessary!!! Windfall Tax on Retirement Income Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below............... Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You are not going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas , it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities! This woman is frightening. She quotes... " We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." ( I am not rich, are you) When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied: "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. "Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it". Send it on to your friends. I just did!! This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house! ~~ SNERK ~~ Good thing Richard isn't here anymore. You'd be embarrassing him big time. Naw. Eisboch said it was ok for Flatulent Jim to post anything here, no matter how idiotic. :) |
She's nuts
On Apr 27, 10:46*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message ... Man, My face is beet red right now. It seemed so like her, I never doubted it. Thanks for setting things straight. "Lu Powell" wrote in message ... Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp "Jim" wrote in message ... This lady has been smoking some weird stuff! Wake up America!!!! Please read this carefully and then read it again and again if necessary!!! Windfall Tax on Retirement Income *Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so darn stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the Speaker of the House is saying. Read below............... *Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. *In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement. This woman is a nut case! You are not going to believe this. *Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual Funds! Alas , it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities! *This woman is frightening. *She quotes... " We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this), in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." *( I am not rich, are you) When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied: "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated *12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." *(Read that quote again and again and let it sink in. "Lower your retirement, give it to others who have not worked as you have for it". Send it on to your friends. I just did!! This lady is out of her mind and she is the speaker of the house! ~~ SNERK ~~ Good thing Richard isn't here anymore. * You'd be embarrassing him big time.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, Don, got a question. Why do you think Harry still posts here? After all, he's whining, insulting and name calling everyone here, and even giving advice to go to Chuck's site and give this place up. But HE doesn't heed his own words! Everyone here (except for two people) has figured out that Harry is the most obnoxious, lying, name calling childish acting person here and want nothing to do with him anyway. |
She's nuts
wrote in message ... Hey, Don, got a question. Why do you think Harry still posts here? snip... You'll have to ask him directly. I might guess that he'd like to offer one final cleaning & fumigating before abandoning the old site......... just for nostalgic purposes. |
She's nuts
"HK" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:45:03 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp The fact still remains that the government is going to come after your 401k (and any other tax deferred investments) to cover their losses on Social Security. When FDR proposed SS it was supposed to always be tax free income. That is certainly not true now if you have any other significant source of income. The big lie on tax deferred investment was that your tax rate when you cashed them in would be lower that it was when you invested the money. I bet that won't be true unless you live well below the poverty level in retirement. It's not "their" losses, it is *our* losses. The upper cap on wages subject to SS needs to be removed, and should have been removed decades ago. No, it is the pols fault that they turned it into a national retirement plan. LBJ raised the payout and the tax rate to bring in a huge inflow of $$$$$$$$ to the government. Knowing that eventually the payout would be bigger than the income. But he and his Congress would not be around to have to worry about it. |
She's nuts
On Apr 27, 1:16*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message ... Hey, Don, got a question. Why do you think Harry still posts here? snip... You'll have to ask him directly. I might guess that he'd like to offer one final cleaning & fumigating before abandoning the old site......... just for nostalgic purposes. That's odd, because he posts here ten times more than he posts at Chuck's site. |
She's nuts
Don White wrote:
wrote in message ... Hey, Don, got a question. Why do you think Harry still posts here? snip... You'll have to ask him directly. I might guess that he'd like to offer one final cleaning & fumigating before abandoning the old site......... just for nostalgic purposes. Now that's moronic! |
She's nuts
"DK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: wrote in message ... Hey, Don, got a question. Why do you think Harry still posts here? snip... You'll have to ask him directly. I might guess that he'd like to offer one final cleaning & fumigating before abandoning the old site......... just for nostalgic purposes. Now that's moronic! Quit changing your personal info. I don't like being haunted. |
She's nuts
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:28:57 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:45:03 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp The fact still remains that the government is going to come after your 401k (and any other tax deferred investments) to cover their losses on Social Security. When FDR proposed SS it was supposed to always be tax free income. That is certainly not true now if you have any other significant source of income. The big lie on tax deferred investment was that your tax rate when you cashed them in would be lower that it was when you invested the money. I bet that won't be true unless you live well below the poverty level in retirement. Well, my tax rate is a *lot* lower when cashing out tax-deferred retirement money. Not just the fed tax rate, but no FICA, Medicare, and state tax. Huge difference. If you've got a million bucks of 401k money you never paid taxes on tucked away expect to pay the Fed tax piper when you cash out. That's no surprise, or shouldn't be. SS was never meant as anything more than subsistence, and that's basically still what it is. I have a buddy who just retired at 67 and gets about 25k a year SS. But as you might suspect, that's the least of his retirement income. What bothers me is the SS disability scams sucking money out of the system. Don't know how much is involved, but when I see law firms advertising on TV that they'll get you SS disability, it raises a red flag. Everybody's different, but I always expected my spending to decrease drastically when I retired. And it has! So have my taxes. --Vic |
She's nuts
I agree with that upper cap on SS needs to be removed, what kind of crap is
that, so anyone who makes more than like 92000 a year doesnt have to pay anymore SS for that year, that had to be a republican bill. The government probably is gonna go after more taxes in the future to pay for this dumb ass 3 trillion dollar war in Iraq. I mean its not free, the republicans answer is lets live on credit and pass it on to the next generation, then we can blame dems for raising taxes. What would that money have done for the economy of the USA if it had been spent here in this country. Its called infrastruture and we better start investing in our own country! Brad "HK" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:45:03 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp The fact still remains that the government is going to come after your 401k (and any other tax deferred investments) to cover their losses on Social Security. When FDR proposed SS it was supposed to always be tax free income. That is certainly not true now if you have any other significant source of income. The big lie on tax deferred investment was that your tax rate when you cashed them in would be lower that it was when you invested the money. I bet that won't be true unless you live well below the poverty level in retirement. It's not "their" losses, it is *our* losses. The upper cap on wages subject to SS needs to be removed, and should have been removed decades ago. |
She's nuts
What will you base the Social Security benefit calculation upon?
Social Security and other entitlement spending is putting this country into far greater debt than the war in Iraq is by orders of magnitude. The solution is is to get rid of entitlement programs at the federal level and move them down to the states. Brad Darnell wrote: I agree with that upper cap on SS needs to be removed, what kind of crap is that, so anyone who makes more than like 92000 a year doesnt have to pay anymore SS for that year, that had to be a republican bill. The government probably is gonna go after more taxes in the future to pay for this dumb ass 3 trillion dollar war in Iraq. I mean its not free, the republicans answer is lets live on credit and pass it on to the next generation, then we can blame dems for raising taxes. What would that money have done for the economy of the USA if it had been spent here in this country. Its called infrastruture and we better start investing in our own country! Brad "HK" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:45:03 -0400, "Lu Powell" wrote: Anyone who passes this stuff on without checking the facts is nuts. While I am no fan of Pelosi nor her socialist fellow-travelers, truth is paramount. No one is well served by passing this trash around. See: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp The fact still remains that the government is going to come after your 401k (and any other tax deferred investments) to cover their losses on Social Security. When FDR proposed SS it was supposed to always be tax free income. That is certainly not true now if you have any other significant source of income. The big lie on tax deferred investment was that your tax rate when you cashed them in would be lower that it was when you invested the money. I bet that won't be true unless you live well below the poverty level in retirement. It's not "their" losses, it is *our* losses. The upper cap on wages subject to SS needs to be removed, and should have been removed decades ago. |
She's nuts
Brad Darnell wrote:
I agree with that upper cap on SS needs to be removed, what kind of crap is that, so anyone who makes more than like 92000 a year doesnt have to pay anymore SS for that year, that had to be a republican bill. The government probably is gonna go after more taxes in the future to pay for this dumb ass 3 trillion dollar war in Iraq. I mean its not free, the republicans answer is lets live on credit and pass it on to the next generation, then we can blame dems for raising taxes. What would that money have done for the economy of the USA if it had been spent here in this country. Its called infrastruture and we better start investing in our own country! Brad The Republican plan for infrastructure is to sell it off to the private sector, so we can be raped in additional ways for improvements we paid for... You think the $600 "economic stimulus" is going to do much for the economy? I don't. Most of that will go to fill up the gas tank of Working Joes and Janes a couple of times, further enriching the rapacious oil companies, and filling up the refrigerator once. |
She's nuts
|
She's nuts
Don White wrote:
"DK" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: wrote in message ... Hey, Don, got a question. Why do you think Harry still posts here? snip... You'll have to ask him directly. I might guess that he'd like to offer one final cleaning & fumigating before abandoning the old site......... just for nostalgic purposes. Now that's moronic! Quit changing your personal info. I don't like being haunted. There's nothing personal about what I changed and I could care less what you think. Haunted? Don't flatter yourself, Donnie. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com