Got a shovel?
 

wrote in message
...
On Mar 31, 9:52 pm, HK wrote:
It's about time to bury rec.boats.

Yep, you've just about ruined it with your lies, insults, name calling
and general contempt for anyone who dares call you out on any of
those.
Actually it's only time for YOU to bury rec.boats because the only
people left who believe your bull**** is JimH and Don.


So...the question has to be...why do you continually respond to him?
Indeed, quite often initiating 'contact'.

Got a shovel?
 

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 03:49:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Mike" wrote in message
...
Harry really, truely, and honestly does not realize (or believe) that he's
the problem here. Amazing isn't it?

I have him KF'd but there's still far too many people responding to him,
and the noise level is still too high.

--Mike


"John" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
. ..

It's about time to bury rec.boats.


Simple Harry - QUIT POSTING OT SUBJECTS that will cut at least half of
the garbage in here.....





I actually like Harry and have enjoyed many of his contributions and
occasional humor. The problem is his obsession with politics, both in
people and in general political philosophies. For all it's warts, I still
love this country and even though I don't necessarily agree with current
directions, I tire of the endless bashing. Constantly calling the POTUS a
"dumbfoch" gets old and is frankly childish. We have a system whereby our
leaders are elected and courses can be changed. rec.boats is not part of
the system.

I also don't subscribe to the notion that all posts *have* to be boating
related. OT posts are ok with me as long as they are of general interest to
people who also share a boating lifestyle or hobby. There's a bunch of
personalities here that the exchange of information, stories and experiences
with can be informative, interesting or just plain funny as hell. I see
nothing wrong with that.

Unfortunately, the constant focus on how screwed up this administration is
by Harry leads to responses (including from me) and it goes downhill from
there.

Ok .... so now we'll give it a go again. Harry's out of the Bozo bin.
Happy Birthday! :-)

Eisboch




As yet, you've not been one of his 'targets' because you didn't agree with
his politics or caught him in his incessant lying.

When that happens, you may change from 'actually liking' Harry to something
not quite as positive.

I'm wondering what Harry did in the last day to get himself out of your
'Bozo Bin'.

In addition to your comments liking America, etc., I would add that I
respect and cherish all babies, whether born or not quite born yet. His
implications that I and other conservatives enjoy the killing of children
and innocent civilians is not the sort of behavior I can tolerate.

Happy Birthday.
--
John *H*
(Not the other one!)

Got a shovel?
 

JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mar 31, 9:52 pm, HK wrote:
It's about time to bury rec.boats.
Yep, you've just about ruined it with your lies, insults, name calling
and general contempt for anyone who dares call you out on any of
those.
Actually it's only time for YOU to bury rec.boats because the only
people left who believe your bull**** is JimH and Don.


So...the question has to be...why do you continually respond to him?
Indeed, quite often initiating 'contact'.


Loogie is one of the reasons this NG is sliding downhill.




Loogy lives in a special chamber of my bozo bin, so he won't infect the
rest of the sewer rats who live down there. In many ways, he reminds me
of that idiot we had here a couple of years ago, the one that claimed to
be a Thai...

His posts are totally devoid of contact. When I read them, I noticed he
"attacked" just about everyone in the newsgroup. I suspect he's just
rip**** that I don't bother with him anymore. Poor little ****.

Got a shovel?
 

On Apr 1, 9:27*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Mar 31, 9:52 pm, HK wrote:

It's about time to bury rec.boats.

Yep, you've just about ruined it with your lies, insults, name calling
and general contempt for anyone who dares call you out on any of
those.
Actually it's only time for YOU to bury rec.boats because the only
people left who believe your bull**** is JimH and Don.

So...the question has to be...why do you continually respond to him?
Indeed, quite often initiating 'contact'.

Because I think liars are the lowest form of human life.

Got a shovel?
 

On Apr 1, 9:37*am, "JimH" wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message

...







wrote in message
...
On Mar 31, 9:52 pm, HK wrote:
It's about time to bury rec.boats.

Yep, you've just about ruined it with your lies, insults, name calling
and general contempt for anyone who dares call you out on any of
those.
Actually it's only time for YOU to bury rec.boats because the only
people left who believe your bull**** is JimH and Don.

So...the question has to be...why do you continually respond to him?
Indeed, quite often initiating 'contact'.

Loogie is one of the reasons this NG is sliding downhill.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

How about you, Jim? What about your lies about someone's wife and
school aged children?

Got a shovel?
 

On Apr 1, 9:42*am, HK wrote:
JimH wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
.. .
wrote in message
...
On Mar 31, 9:52 pm, HK wrote:
It's about time to bury rec.boats.
Yep, you've just about ruined it with your lies, insults, name calling
and general contempt for anyone who dares call you out on any of
those.
Actually it's only time for YOU to bury rec.boats because the only
people left who believe your bull**** is JimH and Don.

So...the question has to be...why do you continually respond to him?
Indeed, quite often initiating 'contact'.

Loogie is one of the reasons this NG is sliding downhill.

Loogy lives in a special chamber of my bozo bin, so he won't infect the
rest of the sewer rats who live down there. In many ways, he reminds me
of that idiot we had here a couple of years ago, the one that claimed to
be a Thai...

His posts are totally devoid of contact. When I read them, I noticed he
"attacked" just about everyone in the newsgroup. I suspect he's just
rip**** that I don't bother with him anymore. Poor little ****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmmm, I wonder if Don and JimH will see that YOU are the most
prominent off topic, name calling, insulting poster here.
Show some proof that I've "attacked" just about everyone here. Your MO
is very predictable. If someone dares call you out on your many, many
daily lies and insults you go into damage control and change the
subject by doing more lies and insults.
It's humorous how you attack me in the post above, then whine that I
attack you.
You call me a poor little **** when YOU are the one that allegedly
hides behind your precious little Bozo's bin and insults and calls
people names!!!!

Got a shovel?
 

wrote in message
...
On Apr 1, 9:27 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Mar 31, 9:52 pm, HK wrote:

It's about time to bury rec.boats.

Yep, you've just about ruined it with your lies, insults, name calling
and general contempt for anyone who dares call you out on any of
those.
Actually it's only time for YOU to bury rec.boats because the only
people left who believe your bull**** is JimH and Don.

So...the question has to be...why do you continually respond to him?
Indeed, quite often initiating 'contact'.

Because I think liars are the lowest form of human life.

I had this problem with Waylon regarding a lovely Carolina lady who spent
many productive years here before going to New Orleans to help out but was
gunned down by home intruders. After Waylon's outrageous lies & crap I had
to flush him down to the septic tank... and I must admit I feel much better
for doing it. Sometimes, for your own salvation you just have to do it.

Got a shovel?
 

On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:24:57 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:52:27 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|It's about time to bury rec.boats.

You may have a lot of help, in this.....

Taken from another NG:

I got contacted by Tim Skirvin, who, as some of you might know, is the
current chairman of the Big 8 UseNet Board. It seems that UseNet as a
free communication medium is a thorn in the side of too many
dictatorial regimes and even the RIAA who increasingly have been
targeting the Big 8 board members with judiciary procedures, with
rather large attorney fees and loss of time being incurred by the
board members as a result. Therefore they are forced to abandon the
principle of non-moderated newsgroups and as a first step are now
contacting all 1200+ high traffic newsgroups by asking them to approve
a RFC to make their ng moderated.

In other words : they're telling us that unless we go moderated,
they're closing us down. And to pick a moderator who runs the risk of
getting sued by China et al.

More info : http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/moderated-ng-faq/ and
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/mod-archives/

Any ideas folks ? or any volunteers for that moderator job ?

Keep sniping, guys...... the writing is on the wall....

It's not going to happen.

Ever.

Got a shovel?
 

No shootski. Agent filters are working well, however. All I see now are
the usual wackos and petulant crybabies.
JR


HK wrote:

It's about time to bury rec.boats.


--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth

Got a shovel?
 

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:52:27 -0400, HK penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|
|It's about time to bury rec.boats.

You may have a lot of help, in this.....

Taken from another NG:

I got contacted by Tim Skirvin, who, as some of you might know, is the
current chairman of the Big 8 UseNet Board. It seems that UseNet as a
free communication medium is a thorn in the side of too many
dictatorial regimes and even the RIAA who increasingly have been
targeting the Big 8 board members with judiciary procedures, with
rather large attorney fees and loss of time being incurred by the
board members as a result. Therefore they are forced to abandon the
principle of non-moderated newsgroups and as a first step are now
contacting all 1200+ high traffic newsgroups by asking them to approve
a RFC to make their ng moderated.

In other words : they're telling us that unless we go moderated,
they're closing us down. And to pick a moderator who runs the risk of
getting sued by China et al.

More info : http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/moderated-ng-faq/ and
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/mod-archives/

Any ideas folks ? or any volunteers for that moderator job ?

Keep sniping, guys...... the writing is on the wall....



Not to worry: rec.boats is a practically no-traffic newsgroup.

Seriously, though, I have no objections any more to moderated
newsgroups. I participate in a couple, and find them much more
informative and fun. Same with a couple of moderated discussion groups I
frequent. Much more signal, much less noise, and the sort of "anonymous"
attack dogs who plague this newsgroup are dumped by the moderators after
their second obnoxious post.

Chuck's joint has possibilities, but could use some more traffic.
Oh...and on a discussion group, you can post photos that appear with the
articles...a bonus.