|
There are times when Bill Clinton...
makes a hell of a lot of sense.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...clinton-i.html Love it - "Let's just saddle up and have an argument." Heh - makes sense to me. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Mar 26, 1:18*pm, Valgard Toebreakerson wrote:
makes a hell of a lot of sense. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...clinton-i.html Love it - "Let's just saddle up and have an argument." Heh - makes sense to me. If nothing else, just for the quotes... "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true." -Bill Clinton -Robert |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Mar 26, 1:18 pm, Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: makes a hell of a lot of sense. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...clinton-i.html Love it - "Let's just saddle up and have an argument." Heh - makes sense to me. If nothing else, just for the quotes... "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true." -Bill Clinton -Robert Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Mar 26, 4:23*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Valgard Toebreakerson" wrote in message ... makes a hell of a lot of sense. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...clinton-i.html Love it - "Let's just saddle up and have an argument." Heh - makes sense to me. Very Perot-like. I thought you were against politics in rec.boats? |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
... On Mar 26, 1:18 pm, Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: makes a hell of a lot of sense. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpu...clinton-i.html Love it - "Let's just saddle up and have an argument." Heh - makes sense to me. If nothing else, just for the quotes... "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true." -Bill Clinton -Robert ============== Hey....try and be fair and balanced. If you're going to carve Clinton's foibles into your memory forever, you must also memorize and discuss all of these: http://s27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...Hypocrites.jpg |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? http://www.joelcomm.com/what_democra...bout_weap.html http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm Eh? It doesn't matter what Democrats said about WMDs. It was Bush who decided on the basis of bad intel and b.s. to go ahead with an invasion, and it was Bush who once more information became blatantly obvious continued with the WMD b.s. and added layers and layers and piles and piles of b.s. in order to justify his ungodly errors and lies. Bush was in charge. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? http://www.joelcomm.com/what_democra...bout_weap.html http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm Eh? It doesn't matter what Democrats said about WMDs. ROTF!! They weren't in charge of the government then...Bush and the Repubs were. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? What else matters? The future matters. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? What else matters? The future matters. There's no future until we have a presidency that can repair the damage Bush has done. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? Did you see the 60 minutes discussion with the FBI agent who interviewed Saddam after his capture? Among other things, Saddam acknowledged that the WMDs *had* been destroyed either by his orders or by the UN inspection teams. However, he also acknowledged that he maintained a pretense that some still existed, mainly out of concern of some Arab neighbors, like Iran. So, I propose this idea for your consideration: Ask yourself if you believe the USA and other Coalition forces were justified in attacking Iraq in order to liberate Kuwait in the first Gulf War? If your answer is "No", then you are truly anti-war, and against any intervention in other country's affairs or aid to our allies with whom we have treaties and promises to help protect. However, if you answered, "Yes", please consider this POV: Following the Gulf War, Saddam and his government remained in power. Over time, Saddam began rejecting agreements made and agreed to in the UN resolutions. Saddam began firing on Coalition aircraft monitoring the compliance of those resolutions. Saddam began obstruction of the activities of UN weapons inspectors. Eventually Saddam kicked the UN weapons inspectors out of the country. Saddam became more and more defiant and boastful, making renewed threats to neighboring countries. He continued to threaten and murder dissenters within Iraq. He continued to maintain the image of having WMDs. (this is important) After his capture, he claimed all WMD's had been destroyed, either by the UN inspectors or by his own government. However, he acknowledged that he maintained a pretense of having WMDs hidden, mainly to provide an image of capability due to the potential threats of neighboring nations, including Iran. The world's intelligence agencies .... repeat .... the world's intelligence agencies, including those of the USA, and most members of Congress believed those claims, because he refused to account for the total destruction of all WMDs. Again, he *refused* to account for the destruction of all WMDs while hinting around that he still had some. Result? Over six months of demands for him to come clean, allow the resumption of inspections, compliance with UN Gulf War resolutions, all of which were rejected, ignored or stalled upon. That's why we invaded Iraq. Bush didn't "lie" in my opinion. He believed what most all other people reading the intelligence believed, including Congress, and did what he thought was necessary. What he thought was necessary may be legitimately debated, but it's a cop-out to say, "Not my fault, I was lied to." Now, with that submitted, I also realize, as evidenced by the absolutely ridiculous and childlike politicking that is going on right now, primarily by the Dems, that reason, logic and common sense don't apply when it comes to politics. It's ok to lie, create "stories" or facts, and change history as long as it serves your agenda. It's disgusting. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Mar 26, 2:48*pm, HK wrote:
It doesn't matter what Democrats said about WMDs. It was Bush who decided on the basis of bad intel and b.s. to go ahead with an invasion, And Hillary and Kerry. Check the voting record. They had access to the same Intel. -Robert |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? What else matters? The future matters. There's no future until we have a presidency that can repair the damage Bush has done. As always, time will tell. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"JimH" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message It doesn't matter what Democrats said about WMDs. ROTF!! They weren't in charge of the government then...Bush and the Repubs were. And? Maybe if Bush just said, "I misspoke" all the party faithful on the left would understand. Seems to work for HClinton. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. There's no future until we have a presidency that can repair the damage Bush has done. So, you figure replacing a dumb liar (in your eyes) with a very smart, cagey and deceitful liar will fix things? No thanks. I'll take the dumb. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:16:13 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "HK" wrote in message m... Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch She claimed it was because she was tired. Later it was confirmed that the claim was written into her prepared speech before she gave it. It wasn't some off the cuff flub. She has also told the "sniper" story at least twice before in recent weeks. Must be very tired, I guess. I mean, come on! I don't care how tired I was, but if at some point in my life I landed in a war zone with reported snipers around had to "run" with covered head to get from the airplane to the building ..... I'd remember every single detail. So would anyone. She's a deceitful liar who will say or do *anything* to get the nomination ...... and win the election. BTW .... the "sniper" story is not the only one she as modified or embellished recently for effect. But, the party "faithful" just brush the lies off as being part of "politicking". Unless it's Bush. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:06:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
It's disgusting. Yes indeed. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
wrote in message ... Bear in mind that slightly more than half of the party faithful aren't exactly under her spell at the present, and are hardly giving her a pass on this. HClinton currently has a 37 percent "favorable" rating among Democrats. Yet, over 40 percent say they will vote for her. What the heck is wrong with this picture? Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch Every politician..federal/provincial/municipal should be hooked up to a reliable lie detector before they can open their mouths. American politicians... two detectors in case they overwhelm the first. ;-) |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:43:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message .. . Bear in mind that slightly more than half of the party faithful aren't exactly under her spell at the present, and are hardly giving her a pass on this. HClinton currently has a 37 percent "favorable" rating among Democrats. Yet, over 40 percent say they will vote for her. What the heck is wrong with this picture? The Democrats are self-destructing. Fun to watch. I find it really interesting that the "super delegates" who are supposed to be the leavening hand in the election are essentially sitting this one out hoping against hope that they won't have to take a stand and support one or the other. The supers all want to have to not take a stand, yet they are going to have to. Which means a brokered convention. And that's going to be a war. Finally - a fun political convention. Back room deals, cigar smoke and a floor fight. Plus, the movement to disrupt the convention on the Obaminions side if Obama isn't nominated and the same from the Clintonistas. WHOO HOO!!! What's really fun is reading the left side of the blogosphere - both sides are going apoplectic using language they usually reserve for GWB for each other. It's delicious. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Whatever Clinton's lies about his sex life, their significance pale in comparison to the Bush Administration's ongoing lies about its war against Iraq. Some of the outright lies being perpetrated by his hopeful successor puts her in the same category. Very scary. "Misspoken", my ass. Eisboch WMDs. After that, what else matters? Did you see the 60 minutes discussion with the FBI agent who interviewed Saddam after his capture? Among other things, Saddam acknowledged that the WMDs *had* been destroyed either by his orders or by the UN inspection teams. However, he also acknowledged that he maintained a pretense that some still existed, mainly out of concern of some Arab neighbors, like Iran. So, I propose this idea for your consideration: Ask yourself if you believe the USA and other Coalition forces were justified in attacking Iraq in order to liberate Kuwait in the first Gulf War? If your answer is "No", then you are truly anti-war, and against any intervention in other country's affairs or aid to our allies with whom we have treaties and promises to help protect. However, if you answered, "Yes", please consider this POV: Following the Gulf War, Saddam and his government remained in power. Over time, Saddam began rejecting agreements made and agreed to in the UN resolutions. Saddam began firing on Coalition aircraft monitoring the compliance of those resolutions. Saddam began obstruction of the activities of UN weapons inspectors. Eventually Saddam kicked the UN weapons inspectors out of the country. Saddam became more and more defiant and boastful, making renewed threats to neighboring countries. He continued to threaten and murder dissenters within Iraq. He continued to maintain the image of having WMDs. (this is important) After his capture, he claimed all WMD's had been destroyed, either by the UN inspectors or by his own government. However, he acknowledged that he maintained a pretense of having WMDs hidden, mainly to provide an image of capability due to the potential threats of neighboring nations, including Iran. The world's intelligence agencies .... repeat .... the world's intelligence agencies, including those of the USA, and most members of Congress believed those claims, because he refused to account for the total destruction of all WMDs. Again, he *refused* to account for the destruction of all WMDs while hinting around that he still had some. Result? Over six months of demands for him to come clean, allow the resumption of inspections, compliance with UN Gulf War resolutions, all of which were rejected, ignored or stalled upon. That's why we invaded Iraq. Bush didn't "lie" in my opinion. He believed what most all other people reading the intelligence believed, including Congress, and did what he thought was necessary. What he thought was necessary may be legitimately debated, but it's a cop-out to say, "Not my fault, I was lied to." Now, with that submitted, I also realize, as evidenced by the absolutely ridiculous and childlike politicking that is going on right now, primarily by the Dems, that reason, logic and common sense don't apply when it comes to politics. It's ok to lie, create "stories" or facts, and change history as long as it serves your agenda. It's disgusting. Eisboch The first Gulf war was entirely different in every respect. I thought it was a good idea because of the support it had, and because there was never any idea of occupying Iraq. I believe Bush lied, he manipulated the intel to support what he wanted to do, and after it started unraveling, he just increased the number of lies. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
John H. wrote:
Heard them all on Rush's show. Yup. Thought Herring was a Limbaugh retard. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... WHOO HOO!!! What's really fun is reading the left side of the blogosphere - both sides are going apoplectic using language they usually reserve for GWB for each other. It's delicious. Hey! One person suffering from logophilia in this NG is enough. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. The first Gulf war was entirely different in every respect. I thought it was a good idea because of the support it had, and because there was never any idea of occupying Iraq. I believe Bush lied, he manipulated the intel to support what he wanted to do, and after it started unraveling, he just increased the number of lies. And that's fine for you to believe that. It's also fine for others not to. As inept as he as proven to be in many things, it's hard to believe he had the capability to convince world intelligence, US intelligence, members of Congress, including those reading the same damn data and reports that he had. If you are correct, you've misjudged his mental capacity. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. John H. wrote: Heard them all on Rush's show. Yup. Thought Herring was a Limbaugh retard. I heard the same thing. But not from Russ Limbaugh. (I've never listened to him). I heard it from ..... Keith Olbermann. Even he was in disbelief, given his obvious leanings. He also reported on a number of other "fact embellishments" regarding HClinton's claims of diplomatic experience. Must have been a slow news night for Keith. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. John H. wrote: Heard them all on Rush's show. Yup. Thought Herring was a Limbaugh retard. I heard the same thing. But not from Russ Limbaugh. (I've never listened to him). I heard it from ..... Keith Olbermann. Even he was in disbelief, given his obvious leanings. He also reported on a number of other "fact embellishments" regarding HClinton's claims of diplomatic experience. Must have been a slow news night for Keith. Eisboch Hmmm. I thought we were discussing the Bush Administrations rationalizations for its war against Iraq. Did I miss a post? |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. Hmmm. I thought we were discussing the Bush Administrations rationalizations for its war against Iraq. Did I miss a post? No. You've been Bush and GOP bashing for years in this NG on a daily basis. We know what you think. It's our turn to comment on lies and deceit of some of the Dems that you admire so much. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:06:20 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . WHOO HOO!!! What's really fun is reading the left side of the blogosphere - both sides are going apoplectic using language they usually reserve for GWB for each other. It's delicious. Hey! One person suffering from logophilia in this NG is enough. Ahem... Ok - I'll return to my normal dumbass persona. Woops - did it again. :) |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message . .. Hmmm. I thought we were discussing the Bush Administrations rationalizations for its war against Iraq. Did I miss a post? No. You've been Bush and GOP bashing for years in this NG on a daily basis. We know what you think. It's our turn to comment on lies and deceit of some of the Dems that you admire so much. Eisboch Oh. Well, have fun with it. Let me know when Obama's or Hillary's lies lead to the deaths of 4000 Americans overseas, the wounding of about 40,000 others, the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis, and a trillion dollars flushed down the toilet. |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:06:21 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
So, I propose this idea for your consideration: Ask yourself if you believe the USA and other Coalition forces were justified in attacking Iraq in order to liberate Kuwait in the first Gulf War? If your answer is "No", then you are truly anti-war, and against any intervention in other country's affairs or aid to our allies with whom we have treaties and promises to help protect. However, if you answered, "Yes", please consider this POV: Following the Gulf War, Saddam and his government remained in power. Over time, Saddam began rejecting agreements made and agreed to in the UN resolutions. Saddam began firing on Coalition aircraft monitoring the compliance of those resolutions. Saddam began obstruction of the activities of UN weapons inspectors. Eventually Saddam kicked the UN weapons inspectors out of the country. Saddam became more and more defiant and boastful, making renewed threats to neighboring countries. He continued to threaten and murder dissenters within Iraq. He continued to maintain the image of having WMDs. (this is important) After his capture, he claimed all WMD's had been destroyed, either by the UN inspectors or by his own government. However, he acknowledged that he maintained a pretense of having WMDs hidden, mainly to provide an image of capability due to the potential threats of neighboring nations, including Iran. The world's intelligence agencies .... repeat .... the world's intelligence agencies, including those of the USA, and most members of Congress believed those claims, because he refused to account for the total destruction of all WMDs. Again, he *refused* to account for the destruction of all WMDs while hinting around that he still had some. Result? Over six months of demands for him to come clean, allow the resumption of inspections, compliance with UN Gulf War resolutions, all of which were rejected, ignored or stalled upon. That's why we invaded Iraq. Bush didn't "lie" in my opinion. He believed what most all other people reading the intelligence believed, including Congress, and did what he thought was necessary. What he thought was necessary may be legitimately debated, but it's a cop-out to say, "Not my fault, I was lied to." Now, with that submitted, I also realize, as evidenced by the absolutely ridiculous and childlike politicking that is going on right now, primarily by the Dems, that reason, logic and common sense don't apply when it comes to politics. It's ok to lie, create "stories" or facts, and change history as long as it serves your agenda. It's disgusting. Eisboch Lying always is. -- John *H* (Not the other one!) |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
|
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:00:42 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: Plus, the movement to disrupt the convention on the Obaminions side if Obama isn't nominated and the same from the Clintonistas. WHOO HOO!!! What's really fun is reading the left side of the blogosphere - both sides are going apoplectic using language they usually reserve for GWB for each other. It's delicious. That last was cruel. But, I'm not complaining. -- John *H* (Not the other one!) |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"HK" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Hmmm. I thought we were discussing the Bush Administrations rationalizations for its war against Iraq. Did I miss a post? No. You've been Bush and GOP bashing for years in this NG on a daily basis. We know what you think. It's our turn to comment on lies and deceit of some of the Dems that you admire so much. Eisboch Oh. Well, have fun with it. Let me know when Obama's or Hillary's lies lead to the deaths of 4000 Americans overseas, the wounding of about 40,000 others, the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis, and a trillion dollars flushed down the toilet. I don't know what to believe. But when I see a potential POTUS lying with such a cavalier attitude about it when caught, just to get the nomination of her party, I get nervous. It's obvious and a fact that she's very capable of lying to achieve a goal. It's a theory by some (and unproven) that Bush did. It could be much, much worse. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:14:47 -0400, Eisboch wrote:
I don't know what to believe. But when I see a potential POTUS lying with such a cavalier attitude about it when caught, just to get the nomination of her party, I get nervous. It's obvious and a fact that she's very capable of lying to achieve a goal. It's a theory by some (and unproven) that Bush did. Both Bill and Hillary are known to play fast and loose with truth. What surprises me, is that you are unwilling to accept that GWB does too. Not all of Bush's lies are unproven. Here's one that is quite similar to Hillary's recent lie. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/bushlie.html I agree with your up-thread post, a sniper would heighten my memory for detail. I can also say, most people can remember exact detail when first hearing about 9/11. Hell, I can remember exactly where I was when I first heard of JFK's assassination. Hillary is a "deceitful liar", but GWB is not? It could be much, much worse. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
"John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:19:14 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: I heard the same thing. But not from Russ Limbaugh. (I've never listened to him). I heard it from ..... Keith Olbermann. Even he was in disbelief, given his obvious leanings. He also reported on a number of other "fact embellishments" regarding HClinton's claims of diplomatic experience. Must have been a slow news night for Keith. Eisboch I wonder if that makes you an Olbermann retard? He's worse than Limbaugh ever thought of being. Hard to believe he said something nasty about Hillary. I listen and watch him. Most of the time I have to grit my teeth to do so, but I listen to what he has to say. Eisboch |
There are times when Bill Clinton...
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:19:14 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: Heard them all on Rush's show. Yup. Thought Herring was a Limbaugh retard. I heard the same thing. But not from Russ Limbaugh. (I've never listened to him). I heard it from ..... Keith Olbermann. Even he was in disbelief, given his obvious leanings. He also reported on a number of other "fact embellishments" regarding HClinton's claims of diplomatic experience. Must have been a slow news night for Keith. Eisboch I wonder if that makes you an Olbermann retard? He's worse than Limbaugh ever thought of being. Hard to believe he said something nasty about Hillary. -- John *H* (Not the other one!) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com