Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but
it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). Windows Vista SP1 Flunks Out At Penn University of Pennsylvania tech staffers are advising faculty and students not to upgrade to the new service pack for Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system. By Paul McDougall InformationWeek March 21, 2008 10:53 AM Windows Vista SP1 Is having a tough time getting into the Ivy League. University of Pennsylvania tech staffers are advising faculty and students not to upgrade their computers to the new service pack for Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT)'s Windows Vista operating system. The school's Information Systems & Computing department said it will support Vista SP1 on new systems where it's pre-installed, but added that it "strongly recommends that all other users adopt a 'wait and see' attitude," according to a newly published department bulletin. Penn's ISC department advised "continuing to use previous versions of Windows XP and Windows Vista until after the initial bugs in SP1 are identified and fixed." Vista SP1 users have reported numerous glitches since the operating system became widely available on Tuesday. "I downloaded it via Windows Update, and got a bluescreen on the third part of the update," wrote "Iggy33", in a comment posted Wednesday on Microsoft's Vista team blog. Iggy33 was just one of dozens of posters complaining about Vista Service Pack 1's effect on their PCs. "What a disaster," wrote "SeppDietrich", of the update. "It exiled all my Nvidia drivers to the Bermuda Triangle." "Bikkja" said that "after installing SP1 things seem to go really slow, even though my computer shouldn't have any problems." Other troubles reported by Vista SP1 users ranged from a simple inability to download the software from Microsoft's Windows Update site to sudden spikes in memory usage. It's not uncommon for major software patches to cause problems when first released. Windows XP Service Pack 1 inflicted numerous glitches on host computers when it shipped in 2002. Microsoft fixed many of the problems with subsequent patches. Penn's ISC department said computer users at the Ivy League school should have systems that employ at least a dual-core or hyperthreading processor and a minimum of 1.5 GB of RAM before considering an upgrade to Vista SP1. That's well above Microsoft's stated minimum requirements for the operating system. The software maker recommends at least a 1-GHz, single core processor and 1 GB of RAM for the Premium, Business and Ultimate versions of Vista. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. If a Vista user was happy with their system, why the hell would they care if the Univ. of Pennsylvania thought the SP1 was full of bugs and did not recommend people install it? It should not impact anyone who is happy with Vista and/or Vista SP1 at all, this was for the people who have not purchased Vista or those who have not installed SP1 yet. I do plan on purchasing 2 new laptops in the next 3 months, and don't want to pay the extra for Apple, so I am watching it closely. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. If a Vista user was happy with their system, why the hell would they care if the Univ. of Pennsylvania thought the SP1 was full of bugs and did not recommend people install it? What the hell do you care, dip****? You don't use VISTA and you aren't going to do so. I believe there are two or three VISTA users here and all of us know more about computers right now than you ever will in your entire life. As I said, you're just playing the snark here. Get a life. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
... HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. If a Vista user was happy with their system, why the hell would they care if the Univ. of Pennsylvania thought the SP1 was full of bugs and did not recommend people install it? Excuse me??? If someone's happy with their unpatched computer, but 20 minutes later, they install a patch and new problems arise, then it's obvious why the hell they should care. As far as the source of the warning (the university), institutional IT departments are often the first to see a pattern. Your experience with your own computer means nothing without more information. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:51:30 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message ... HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. If a Vista user was happy with their system, why the hell would they care if the Univ. of Pennsylvania thought the SP1 was full of bugs and did not recommend people install it? Excuse me??? If someone's happy with their unpatched computer, but 20 minutes later, they install a patch and new problems arise, then it's obvious why the hell they should care. As far as the source of the warning (the university), institutional IT departments are often the first to see a pattern. Your experience with your own computer means nothing without more information. Whooosh. Harry is happy with his Vista, and therefore should not care about what the UP IT department says about it, and therefore should not be attacking Reggie for providing some useful information. -- John *H* (Not the other one!) |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HK" wrote in message
... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. I don't have my kid's Vista laptop here to poke around in. I'd like to call him and give him a heads-up. How do you check quickly for the presence of a service pack? Right click "my computer", as done with XP? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. I don't have my kid's Vista laptop here to poke around in. I'd like to call him and give him a heads-up. How do you check quickly for the presence of a service pack? Right click "my computer", as done with XP? I'm not sure SP1 downloads all by itself. In any event, I'm running SP1 VISTA. Everything on this system is running in nominal fashion. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HK" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. I don't have my kid's Vista laptop here to poke around in. I'd like to call him and give him a heads-up. How do you check quickly for the presence of a service pack? Right click "my computer", as done with XP? I'm not sure SP1 downloads all by itself. In any event, I'm running SP1 VISTA. Everything on this system is running in nominal fashion. Do you have a "my computer" icon on the desktop? If yes, please right click it, click properties, and tell me if you see any mention of which service pack is on the machine. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: Well, I was hoping MS might have corrected their problems with SP1, but it looks like they are up a creek without a paddle (boating reference). More b.s. from Reggie the Snark, who doesn't give a tinker's dam about Vista, but only posts this crap to *try* to annoy VISTA users, who, sadly for him, think him only a bigger fool for playing this game. I don't have my kid's Vista laptop here to poke around in. I'd like to call him and give him a heads-up. How do you check quickly for the presence of a service pack? Right click "my computer", as done with XP? I'm not sure SP1 downloads all by itself. In any event, I'm running SP1 VISTA. Everything on this system is running in nominal fashion. Do you have a "my computer" icon on the desktop? If yes, please right click it, click properties, and tell me if you see any mention of which service pack is on the machine. Service Pack 1 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Windows Vista Beta 5342 Available for download | General |